S Latosinsky1,2, B Allen2, S Z Shariff2,3. 1. Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON. 2. ices Western, Western University, London, ON. 3. Arthur Labatt School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON.
Abstract
Background: In 2012 in the United States, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Society of Surgical Oncology (asco/sso) published a joint guideline about indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (slnb) in cutaneous melanoma. The guideline supported completion lymph node dissection (clnd) for all patients with positive sentinel nodes. We examined the rates and predictors of slnb and clnd for melanoma patients in Ontario (population 13.6 million) after publication of that guideline. Methods: We used the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma in 2013. Patient records were linked to prospectively maintained health administrative databases to obtain details for each patient, including surgical procedures. Results: Of the 3298 patients with melanoma identified in Ontario in 2013, 1973 (59.8%) could be analyzed. Most of that group (n = 1227, 62.2%) underwent local excision alone; 746 (37.8%) had a slnb. The slnb was performed in 13.9%, 67.8%, 62.6%, and 47.2% of patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 primary melanomas respectively. In multivariate analysis, receipt of slnb was positively associated with younger age (<80 years), higher T stage, and a non-head-and-neck primary. Of the patients who had a slnb, 136 (18.2%) were found to be node-positive. A clnd was performed in 82 of those patients (60.3%). Conclusions: In Ontario, only two thirds of patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas (T2, T3) underwent slnb as recommended by the asco/sso guideline. Use of slnb was less frequent for patients with a head-and-neck primary and higher for younger patients (<80 years). The rate of clnd after a positive slnb was also low relative to the guideline recommendation. 2019 Multimed Inc.
Background: In 2012 in the United States, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Society of Surgical Oncology (asco/sso) published a joint guideline about indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (slnb) in cutaneous melanoma. The guideline supported completion lymph node dissection (clnd) for all patients with positive sentinel nodes. We examined the rates and predictors of slnb and clnd for melanomapatients in Ontario (population 13.6 million) after publication of that guideline. Methods: We used the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma in 2013. Patient records were linked to prospectively maintained health administrative databases to obtain details for each patient, including surgical procedures. Results: Of the 3298 patients with melanoma identified in Ontario in 2013, 1973 (59.8%) could be analyzed. Most of that group (n = 1227, 62.2%) underwent local excision alone; 746 (37.8%) had a slnb. The slnb was performed in 13.9%, 67.8%, 62.6%, and 47.2% of patients with T1, T2, T3, and T4 primary melanomas respectively. In multivariate analysis, receipt of slnb was positively associated with younger age (<80 years), higher T stage, and a non-head-and-neck primary. Of the patients who had a slnb, 136 (18.2%) were found to be node-positive. A clnd was performed in 82 of those patients (60.3%). Conclusions: In Ontario, only two thirds of patients with intermediate-thickness melanomas (T2, T3) underwent slnb as recommended by the asco/sso guideline. Use of slnb was less frequent for patients with a head-and-neck primary and higher for younger patients (<80 years). The rate of clnd after a positive slnb was also low relative to the guideline recommendation. 2019 Multimed Inc.
Authors: Swapnil D Kachare; Jason Brinkley; Jan H Wong; Nasreen A Vohra; Emmanuel E Zervos; Timothy L Fitzgerald Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-07-26 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sandra L Wong; Mark B Faries; Erin B Kennedy; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Timothy J Akhurst; Charlotte Ariyan; Charles M Balch; Barry S Berman; Alistair Cochran; Keith A Delman; Mark Gorman; John M Kirkwood; Marc D Moncrieff; Jonathan S Zager; Gary H Lyman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alexander H R Varey; Christine M Madronio; Anne E Cust; Chris Goumas; Graham J Mann; Bruce K Armstrong; Richard A Scolyer; Austin M Curtin; John F Thompson Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Donald L Morton; John F Thompson; Alistair J Cochran; Nicola Mozzillo; Robert Elashoff; Richard Essner; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harald J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Douglas S Reintgen; Brendon J Coventry; Edwin C Glass; He-Jing Wang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeffrey Weber; Mario Mandala; Michele Del Vecchio; Helen J Gogas; Ana M Arance; C Lance Cowey; Stéphane Dalle; Michael Schenker; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Ivan Marquez-Rodas; Jean-Jacques Grob; Marcus O Butler; Mark R Middleton; Michele Maio; Victoria Atkinson; Paola Queirolo; Rene Gonzalez; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Michael Smylie; Nicolas Meyer; Laurent Mortier; Michael B Atkins; Georgina V Long; Shailender Bhatia; Celeste Lebbé; Piotr Rutkowski; Kenji Yokota; Naoya Yamazaki; Tae M Kim; Veerle de Pril; Javier Sabater; Anila Qureshi; James Larkin; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-09-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eric I Benchimol; Liam Smeeth; Astrid Guttmann; Katie Harron; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Henrik T Sørensen; Erik von Elm; Sinéad M Langan Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jane Yuet Ching Hui; Erin Burke; Kristy K Broman; Schelomo Marmor; Eric Jensen; Todd M Tuttle; Jonathan S Zager Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.454