Literature DB >> 33284503

A mortality risk score for heart transplants after contemporary ventricular assist device bridging.

Lauren V Huckaby1, Laura M Seese1, Gavin Hickey2, Ibrahim Sultan1, Arman Kilic1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to derive a risk score for 1-year mortality following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in patients bridged with a contemporary centrifugal left ventricular assist device (LVAD).
METHODS: Adult patients (≥18 years) in the United Network for Organ Sharing database undergoing OHT between 2010 and 2019 who were bridged with a HeartWare or HeartMate III device were included. Derivation and validation cohorts were randomly assigned with a 2:1 ratio. Threshold analysis and multivariable logistic regression were utilized to obtain adjusted odds ratios for 1-year post-OHT mortality. A risk score was generated using these adjusted odds ratios in the derivation cohort and the predictive performance of the composite index was evaluated in the validation set.
RESULTS: A total of 3434 patients were identified. In the derivation cohort, the mean age was 53.5 ± 12.1 years and 1758 (76.8%) were male; 1789 (78.1%) were bridged with a HeartWare device. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that recipient age ≥50 years, bilirubin level ≥2.4 mg/dl, ischemic time ≥4 h, and preoperative hemodialysis predicted 1-year post-transplant mortality. Stratification into risk groups in the validation cohort revealed significant differences in postoperative renal failure, stroke, and short-term mortality. One-year post-transplant mortality was 5%, 6.7%, and 14.8% in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk categories, respectively (p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients bridged to OHT with newer generation centrifugal LVADs, older age, increasing bilirubin, longer ischemic time, and pre-OHT dialysis independently predicted post-transplant mortality. The composite risk score based on these factors may assist in patient selection and prognostication in those supported with contemporary LVADs.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart transplantation; survival; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33284503      PMCID: PMC9015730          DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.778


  22 in total

1.  Risk prediction for early in-hospital mortality following heart transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Tajinder P Singh; Christopher S Almond; Marc J Semigran; Gary Piercey; Kimberlee Gauvreau
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Heart transplantation outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device-related complications.

Authors:  Mohammed A Quader; Luke G Wolfe; Vigneshwar Kasirajan
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Effect of age on outcomes after left ventricular assist device placement.

Authors:  R Huang; M Deng; J G Rogers; R Howser; P M Portner; R N Pierson; J Butler
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Impact of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-mediated humoral sensitization on post-transplant outcomes.

Authors:  David L Joyce; Robert E Southard; Guillermo Torre-Amione; George P Noon; Geoffrey A Land; Matthias Loebe
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Association of recipient age and causes of heart transplant mortality: Implications for personalization of post-transplant management-An analysis of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry.

Authors:  Omar Wever-Pinzon; Leah B Edwards; David O Taylor; Abdallah G Kfoury; Stavros G Drakos; Craig H Selzman; James C Fang; Lars H Lund; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  The association of pretransplant HeartMate II left ventricular assist device placement and heart transplantation mortality.

Authors:  Macarius Donneyong; Allen Cheng; Jaimin R Trivedi; Erin Schumer; Kelly C McCants; Emma J Birks; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 7.  Third-Generation LVADs: Has Anything Changed?

Authors:  Avi Levine; Alan Gass
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Impact of long term left ventricular assist device therapy on donor allocation in cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Nir Uriel; Ulrich P Jorde; Sang Woo Pak; Jeff Jiang; Kevin Clerkin; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; P Christian Schulze; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Should patients 60 years and older undergo bridge to transplantation with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices?

Authors:  Jeremiah G Allen; Arman Kilic; Eric S Weiss; George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Ashish S Shah; John V Conte
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Trends in Mechanical Support Use as a Bridge to Adult Heart Transplant Under New Allocation Rules.

Authors:  Thomas C Hanff; Michael O Harhay; Stephen E Kimmel; Maria Molina; Jeremy A Mazurek; Lee R Goldberg; Edo Y Birati
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

View more
  1 in total

1.  Trends and outcomes following total artificial heart as bridge to transplant from the UNOS database.

Authors:  Garrett N Coyan; Lauren V Huckaby; Carlos E Diaz-Castrillon; Alyssa M Miguelino; Arman Kilic
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 1.620

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.