Literature DB >> 22308287

Risk prediction for early in-hospital mortality following heart transplantation in the United States.

Tajinder P Singh1, Christopher S Almond, Marc J Semigran, Gary Piercey, Kimberlee Gauvreau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for early mortality after heart transplant (HT) have not been used for quantitative risk prediction. We sought to develop and validate a risk prediction model for posttransplant in-hospital mortality in HT recipients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We derived the model in subjects aged ≥18 years who underwent primary HT in the United States from January 2007 to June 2009 (n=4248) and validated it internally using a bootstrapping technique (200 random samples, n=4248). We then assessed the model's performance in patients receiving an HT from July 2009 to October 2010 (external validation cohort, n=2346). Posttransplant in-hospital mortality was 4.7% in the model derivation cohort. The best-fitting model based on recipient characteristics at transplant had 6 variables: age, diagnosis, type of mechanical support, ventilator support, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and total serum bilirubin. Model discrimination for survivors versus nonsurvivors was acceptable during derivation and internal validation (C statistic, 0.722 and 0.731, respectively) as was model calibration during derivation (Hosmer Lemeshow [HL] P=0.47). Model performance was reasonable in the external validation cohort (predicted mortality, 4.9%; actual mortality, 4.3%; R(2)=0.95; C statistic, 0.68; HL P=0.48). Adding the donor-related variables of age and ischemic time to the model improved its performance in both the model derivation (C statistic, 0.742; HL P=0.70) and the external validation (C statistic, 0.695; HL P=0.42) cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model allows risk stratification of HT candidates for early posttransplant mortality and may be useful in counseling patients with regard to their posttransplant prognosis. The model with additional donor-related variables may be useful during donor selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22308287     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.965996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  5 in total

1.  The liver in heart failure: a biopsy and explant series of the histopathologic and laboratory findings with a particular focus on pre-cardiac transplant evaluation.

Authors:  Christine Y Louie; Michael X Pham; Tami J Daugherty; Neeraja Kambham; John P T Higgins
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following the 2018 adult heart allocation policy.

Authors:  Samuel T Kim; Yu Xia; Zachary Tran; Joseph Hadaya; Vishal Dobaria; Chun Woo Choi; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Strategies of Wait-listing for Heart Transplant vs Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Alone for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Anuradha Lala; John C Rowland; Bart S Ferket; Annetine C Gelijns; Emilia Bagiella; Sean P Pinney; Alan J Moskowitz; Marissa A Miller; Francis D Pagani; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  A mortality risk score for heart transplants after contemporary ventricular assist device bridging.

Authors:  Lauren V Huckaby; Laura M Seese; Gavin Hickey; Ibrahim Sultan; Arman Kilic
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 5.  Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: a thorn amongst the roses.

Authors:  Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Jonathan R Dalzell; Colin Berry; Nawwar Al-Attar
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.214

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.