Literature DB >> 16364849

Impact of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-mediated humoral sensitization on post-transplant outcomes.

David L Joyce1, Robert E Southard, Guillermo Torre-Amione, George P Noon, Geoffrey A Land, Matthias Loebe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Humoral sensitization, defined as a panel-reactive antibody (PRA) screen of >10%, places heart transplant recipients at a greater risk of acute rejection and mortality. Previous studies have suggested an increased sensitization in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients, although neither the impact of device selection nor the clinical importance of elevated PRA in these patients has been completely described.
METHODS: Using the registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), we compared PRA levels in 7,686 heart transplant recipients to determine the impact of LVAD therapy on humoral sensitization, acute rejection and mortality. To determine the impact of device selection on sensitization, we compared data from the ISHLT registry as well as from our own institution.
RESULTS: Elevated PRA levels were found in 16.6% of LVAD recipients, compared with 7.6% of non-LVAD controls (p < 0.0001). Sensitization differed by device type, being present in 21.9% of Thoratec recipients, 14.4% of HeartMate recipients, and 15.5% of Novacor recipients (p = 0.01). Despite these findings, LVAD use had no impact on rejection rates. LVAD use was associated with a small increase (4.4% and 4.3%, respectively) in 1- and 2-year mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the concept that mechanical circulatory support increases the rate of humoral sensitization. However, these differences in sensitization do not translate to substantial differences in the clinical outcomes of rejection and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16364849     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  17 in total

1.  Effect of sensitization in US heart transplant recipients bridged with a ventricular assist device: update in a modern cohort.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Arman Kilic; Eric S Weiss; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Ventricular assist devices: pharmacological aspects of a mechanical therapy.

Authors:  O Wever-Pinzon; J Stehlik; A G Kfoury; J V Terrovitis; N A Diakos; C Charitos; D Y Li; S G Drakos
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  Costimulatory blockade of CD154-CD40 in combination with T-cell lymphodepletion results in prevention of allogeneic sensitization.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Jun Yan; Yiming Huang; Paula M Chilton; Chuanlin Ding; Carrie L Schanie; Li Wang; Suzanne T Ildstad
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Desensitization Strategies Pre- and Post-Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Robert M Cole; Jon A Kobashigawa
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-02

5.  LVAD implant as a bridge to heart transplantation is associated with allosensitization as measured by single antigen bead assay.

Authors:  Nisha Shankar; Richard Daly; Jennifer Geske; Sudhir K Kushwaha; Michael Timmons; Lyle Joyce; John Stulak; Manish Gandhi; Walter Kremers; Soon Park; Naveen L Pereira
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Characterization of ventricular assist device-mediated sensitization in the bridge-to-heart-transplantation patient.

Authors:  Murray H Kwon; Jennifer Q Zhang; Joanna M Schaenman; Martin Cadeiras; David W Gjertson; Carolyn A Krystal; Hillel Laks; Abbas Ardehali; Mario C Deng; Richard J Shemin; Elaine F Reed
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 7.  Heart failure in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and future research.

Authors:  Joshua Remick; Vasiliki Georgiopoulou; Catherine Marti; Igho Ofotokun; Andreas Kalogeropoulos; William Lewis; Javed Butler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Management of allosensitized cardiac transplant candidates.

Authors:  Mauricio Velez; Maryl R Johnson
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.943

9.  Report from a consensus conference on the sensitized patient awaiting heart transplantation.

Authors:  Jon Kobashigawa; Mandeep Mehra; Lori West; Ronald Kerman; James George; Marlene Rose; Adriana Zeevi; Nancy Reinsmoen; Jignesh Patel; Elaine F Reed
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Prior human leukocyte antigen-allosensitization and left ventricular assist device type affect degree of post-implantation human leukocyte antigen-allosensitization.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; John R Kotter; Bruce B Reid; Stephen E Clayson; Craig H Selzman; Josef Stehlik; Patrick W Fisher; Mario Merida; David D Eckels; Kim Brunisholz; Benjamin D Horne; Sandi Stoker; Dean Y Li; Dale G Renlund
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 10.247

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.