| Literature DB >> 33282174 |
Xinggui Tian1,2, Xiaowei Yuan1,3, Daxiong Feng2, Min Wu1, Yuping Yuan4, Chuying Ma5, Denghui Xie1, Jinshan Guo1, Chao Liu5, Zhihui Lu1.
Abstract
Biomaterial mediated bone regeneration is an attractive strategy for bone defect treatment. Organic/inorganic composites have been well established as effective bone graft. Here, the bone regenerative effect of the composites made from tannic acid (TA) modified hydroxyapatite (HA) (THA) or TA & silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) modified HA (Ag-THA) and polyurethane (PU) was evaluated on critical-sized calvarial defects in rats. The in vivo study indicates that PU/THA and PU/Ag-THA scaffolds exhibited acceptable biocompatibility and induced significantly enhanced bone mineral densities comparing with the blank control (CON) group as well as PU/HA group. The inclusion of TA on HA brought the composites with enhanced osteogenesis and angiogenesis, evidenced by osteocalcin (OCN) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) immunohistochemical staining. Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining showed high osteoclast activity along with osteogenesis, especially in PU/THA and PU/Ag-THA groups. However, further introduction of Ag NPs on HA depressed the angiogenesis of the composites, leading to even lower VEGF expression than that of CON group. This study once more proved that THA can serve as a better bone composite component that pure HA and can promote osteogenesis and angiogenesis. While, the introduction of antimicrobial Ag NPs on HA need to be controlled in some extent not to affect the angiogenesis of the composites.Entities:
Keywords: Tannin; angiogenesis; bone regeneration; composite; polyurethane
Year: 2020 PMID: 33282174 PMCID: PMC7682243 DOI: 10.1177/2041731420968030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tissue Eng ISSN: 2041-7314 Impact factor: 7.813
Scheme 1.Fabrication of PU/HA, PU/THA and PU/Ag-THA composite microparticles (MPs) and the application of them for calvarial regeneration on rats.
Figure 4.Representative tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining images of the treated calvarial defect sections by different samples 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation.
Figure 2.The representative reconstructed 3D (top view) and 2D (side view, midsagittal section) images of the treated calvarial defects for different groups collected at week 4, 8, 12 post surgery. The diameters of the red dotted cycles in the 3D images and lengths of the red colored arrows in the 2D images are all 5 mm.
Figure 3.Representative histological staining images of the treated calvarial defect sections for PU/HA, PU/THA, PU/Ag-THA, AB and blank control (CON) groups 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation. (a) H&E (hematoxylin and eosin) staining. (b) Masson’s trichrome staining. (c) Safranin O & fast green staining.
B: bone; C: cartilage; F: fibrous tissue; S: scaffold.
Figure 5.OCN (osteocalcin, a) and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor, b) immunohistochemical staining images of treated calvarial defects reflecting the osteogenesis and angiogenesis; The OCN and VEGF positive staining cells are pointed out using black and red color arrows respectively. The numbers of OCN (c) positive cells per mm length of bone perimeter (B. Pm.), and the mean optical densities of VEGF (d) positive cells calculated from OCN and VEGF staining images respectively.
#p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.