Literature DB >> 24880845

Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.

Lu Yin1, Mingchun Jiang2, Wenjing Chen3, Roger J Smales4, Qingzhu Wang5, Lei Tang6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The principal aim of this study was to investigate differences in perception of soft-tissue facial profiles and dental esthetics between young Chinese adults and orthodontists.
METHODS: Eight hundred ninety-two subjects (444 male, 448 female), ages 16 to 24 years, chose 1 image from among 5 profile silhouettes and from among 10 ranked color photographs of the aesthetic component (AC) of the index of orthodontic treatment need that most closely resembled their own profile and dental esthetic appearance, respectively. A panel of 20 orthodontists then independently repeated the same image selection process. Each subject also completed the Eysenck personality questionnaire for psychoticism. We used the Mann-Whitney U test and the Spearman rank correlation test, with statistical significance set at α = 0.05.
RESULTS: Only 37.0% of subjects had straight profiles by objective orthodontic assessment, but 85.0% chose straight profiles by subjective self-perception. About 17.5%, mainly females, chose the mild convex as the ideal profile. Only 2.5% of the subjects were ranked 1 on the AC by orthodontists, but 43.6% chose 1, or ideal, by self-perception. Male subjects scored significantly higher than did female subjects for self-perceived facial profiles (more protruded chins) and for the AC (more attractive dental appearance). Subjects with high psychoticism T scores (>50) scored significantly lower for self-perceived facial profiles (more retruded chins) and on the AC (less attractive dental appearance).
CONCLUSIONS: Young Chinese adults perceived their facial profiles and dental appearances to be significantly more straight and attractive, respectively, than did the orthodontists. A significant proportion of the young adults, mainly women, preferred a mild convex facial profile. High psychoticism scores might significantly affect the self-perception of orthodontic treatment needs.
Copyright © 2014 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880845     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Aesthetic facial perception and need for treatment in simulated laterognathism in male faces of different ethnicities.

Authors:  Priscilla Bispo de Carvalho Barbosa; Walbert de Andrade Vieira; Ítalo de Macedo Bernardino; Marcio Magno Costa; Matheus Melo Pithon; Luiz Renato Paranhos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-06-11

2.  Comparision of profile macro-estethic perception among orthodontists, dentistry students, orthodontic patients and surgical orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Michele Cassetta; Rosanna Guarnieri; Martina Mezio; Federica Altieri; Giulia Brandetti; Gabriella Padalino; Roberto Di Giorgio; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-12-01

3.  Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status.

Authors:  Mohammed Nasser Alhajj; Zaihan Ariffin; Asja Celebić; Abdulaziz A Alkheraif; Abdullah G Amran; Ibrahim A Ismail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A CBCT Evaluation of Esthetic Preference Regarding the Perceived Facial Attractiveness of Young Korean Female Adults with a Normal Skeletal Pattern.

Authors:  Jin-Hyoung Oh; Jae Hyun Park; Heon Jae Cho; Hye Young Seo; Jong-Moon Chae
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Comparison of esthetics perception and satisfaction of facial profile among male adolescents and adults with different profiles.

Authors:  Neda Eslami; Maryam Omidkhoda; Hooman Shafaee; Mostafa Mozhdehifard
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

6.  Perception of Dental Students and Laypersons to Altered Dentofacial Aesthetics.

Authors:  Khalid Aldhorae; Basema Alqadasi; Zainab M Altawili; Ali Assiry; Anas Shamalah; Salah Addin Al-Haidari
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2019-11-11

7.  Czech and Slovak Dental Students' Oral Health-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours (KAB): Multi-Country Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Abanoub Riad; Veronika Chuchmová; Ján Staněk; Barbora Hocková; Sameh Attia; Martin Krsek; Miloslav Klugar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.