Literature DB >> 1593319

The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness.

C Phillips1, C J Trentini, N Douvartzidis.   

Abstract

Pretreatment and posttreatment frontal and profile slides of 13 orthodontic camouflage and 13 orthognathic surgery patients were shown to three panels of judges: an orthodontic, an oral surgery, and a "lay" panel of first-semester dental students. Each judge rated the facial attractiveness of the pretreatment and posttreatment views of each patient using a visual analog scale. A mean pretreatment and posttreatment score was then calculated for each treatment group for each judge. Paired t tests were used to compare the treatment groups and time periods. The orthodontic camouflage group was rated as significantly more attractive than the orthognathic surgery patients before treatment. There was no significant change in the facial attractiveness mean score for the orthodontic group, whereas the orthognathic surgery group was rated as showing a significant improvement. However, the orthognathic surgery group was still rated as being significantly less attractive after treatment than the orthodontics-only group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1593319     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90439-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

1.  Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Katharina Klaus; Christian Heumann; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Perceptions of laypersons and orthodontists regarding the buccal corridor in long- and short-face individuals.

Authors:  Sabrina Elisa Zange; Adilson Luiz Ramos; Osmar Aparecido Cuoghi; Marcos Rogério de Mendonça; Rosely Suguino
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of the facial profile attractiveness in Class III borderline patients after surgical or compensatory orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Julie-Heide-Miyazaki Watanabe; Francisco Fitarelli; Daniel-Salvatore de Freitas; Rodrigo-Hermont Cançado; Renata-Cristina-Gobbi de Oliveira; Ricardo-Cesar-Gobbi de Oliveira; Fabricio-Pinelli Valarelli; Karina-Maria-Salvatore Freitas
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01

4.  Comparision of profile macro-estethic perception among orthodontists, dentistry students, orthodontic patients and surgical orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Michele Cassetta; Rosanna Guarnieri; Martina Mezio; Federica Altieri; Giulia Brandetti; Gabriella Padalino; Roberto Di Giorgio; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-12-01

5.  Golden proportion assessment between maxillary and mandibular teeth on Indian population.

Authors:  Naveen Gopi Chander; Vaikunth Vijay Kumar; Vedantham Rangarajan
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Comparison of esthetics perception and satisfaction of facial profile among male adolescents and adults with different profiles.

Authors:  Neda Eslami; Maryam Omidkhoda; Hooman Shafaee; Mostafa Mozhdehifard
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.