Literature DB >> 33281411

Can Post-Treatment MRI Features Predict Pathological Circumferential Resection Margin (pCRM) Involvement in Low Rectal Tumors.

A Patra1,2, A D Baheti1,2, S K Ankathi1,2, A Desouza2,3, R Engineer2,4, V Ostwal2,5, A Ramaswamy2,5, A Saklani2,5.   

Abstract

The MERCURY II study demonstrated the use of MRI-based risk factors such as extramural venous invasion (EMVI), tumor location, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement to preoperatively predict pCRM (pathological CRM) outcomes for lower rectal tumors in a mixed group of upfront operated patients and patients who received neoadjuvant treatment. We aim to study the applicability of results of MERCURY II study in a homogeneous cohort of patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACTRT) prior to surgery. After Institutional Review Board approval, post NACTRT restaging MRI of 132 patients operated for low rectal cancer between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists for site of tumor, EMVI status, distance from anal verge (< 4 or > 4 cm), and mrCRM positivity. Findings were compared with post surgery pCRM outcomes using Fisher's exact test. Only 9/132(7%) patients showed pCRM involvement on histopathology, 8 of them being CRM positive on MRI (p = 0.01). The positive predictive value (PPV) of mrCRM positive status and pCRM status was 12.7% (95% CI: 9.7-16.5%), while the negative predictive value was 98.5% (95% CI: 91.4-99.8%) (p = 0.01). EMVI positive and anteriorly located tumors showed higher incidence of pCRM positivity but were not found to be significant (15% vs 5.2% and p = 0.13 and 8.6% vs 2.1% and p = 0.28, respectively). Unsafe mrCRM was the only factor significantly associated with pCRM positivity on post neoadjuvant restaging MRI. Tumors less than 4 cm from anal verge, anterior tumor location, and mrEMVI positivity did not show statistically significant results to predict pCRM involvement. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumferential resection margin (CRM); Low rectal carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Neoadjuvant therapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33281411      PMCID: PMC7714814          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01218-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  25 in total

1.  Total mesorectal excision: what are we doing?

Authors:  David B Stewart; David W Dietz
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

2.  Local recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer is associated with anterior position of the tumour.

Authors:  C L H Chan; E L Bokey; P H Chapuis; A A Renwick; O F Dent
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The use of MR imaging in treatment planning for patients with rectal carcinoma: have you checked the "DISTANCE"?

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; Caroline Reinhold; Hisham W Mikhael; Philippe Rouanet; Frédéric Bibeau; Gina Brown
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The Impact of Tumour Distance From the Anal Verge on Clinical Management and Outcomes in Patients Having a Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Amir Saeed Khan; Chin W Ang; Abdul Rahman Hakeem; Nigel Scott; Rick Nigel Saunders; Ian Botterill
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  MRI predictive factors for tumor response in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy--implications for induction chemotherapy?

Authors:  Stanley K T Yu; Diana Tait; Ian Chau; Gina Brown
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Roger Marr; Kevin Birbeck; James Garvican; Christopher P Macklin; Nicholas J Tiffin; Wendy J Parsons; Michael F Dixon; Nicholas P Mapstone; David Sebag-Montefiore; Nigel Scott; David Johnston; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan; Philip Quirke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Does circumferential tumor location affect the circumferential resection margin status in mid and low rectal cancer?

Authors:  Byung Mo Kang; Yong-Koo Park; Sun Jin Park; Kil Yeon Lee; Chang Woo Kim; Suk-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.767

8.  The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer.

Authors:  I C Talbot; S Ritchie; M H Leighton; A O Hughes; H J Bussey; B C Morson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Long-course oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study.

Authors:  K Bujko; L Wyrwicz; A Rutkowski; M Malinowska; L Pietrzak; J Kryński; W Michalski; J Olędzki; J Kuśnierz; L Zając; M Bednarczyk; M Szczepkowski; W Tarnowski; E Kosakowska; J Zwoliński; M Winiarek; K Wiśniowska; M Partycki; K Bęczkowska; W Polkowski; R Styliński; R Wierzbicki; P Bury; M Jankiewicz; K Paprota; M Lewicka; B Ciseł; M Skórzewska; J Mielko; M Bębenek; A Maciejczyk; B Kapturkiewicz; A Dybko; Ł Hajac; A Wojnar; T Leśniak; J Zygulska; D Jantner; E Chudyba; W Zegarski; M Las-Jankowska; M Jankowski; L Kołodziejski; A Radkowski; U Żelazowska-Omiotek; B Czeremszyńska; L Kępka; J Kolb-Sielecki; Z Toczko; Z Fedorowicz; A Dziki; A Danek; G Nawrocki; R Sopyło; W Markiewicz; P Kędzierawski; J Wydmański
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Characteristics and Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Circumferential Margin in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoji Ma; Xinxiang Li; Linghui Xu; Debing Shi; Tong Tong; Dan Huang; Ying Ding; Sanjun Cai; Junjie Peng
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  2 in total

1.  MRI at Restaging After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Overestimates Circumferential Resection Margin Proximity as Determined by Comparison With Whole-Mount Pathology.

Authors:  Jonathan B Yuval; Hannah M Thompson; Canan Firat; Floris S Verheij; Maria Widmar; Iris H Wei; Emmanouil Pappou; J Joshua Smith; Martin R Weiser; Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash; Jinru Shia; Marc J Gollub; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (India Chapter) and Indian rectal cancer expert group's practical consensus statements for surgical management of localized and locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  S P Somashekhar; Avanish Saklani; Jagannath Dixit; Jagdish Kothari; Sandeep Nayak; O V Sudheer; Surender Dabas; Jagadishwar Goud; Venkatesh Munikrishnan; Pavan Sugoor; Prasanth Penumadu; C Ramachandra; Shilpa Mehendale; Akhil Dahiya
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.