Literature DB >> 24074924

MRI predictive factors for tumor response in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy--implications for induction chemotherapy?

Stanley K T Yu1, Diana Tait, Ian Chau, Gina Brown.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics at baseline and following chemoradiation therapy (CRT) most strongly associated with histopathologic response were investigated and survival outcomes evaluated in accordance with imaging and pathological response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Responders were defined as mrT3c/d-4 downstaged to ypT0-2 on pathology or low at risk mrT2 downstaged to ypT1 or T0. Multivariate logistic regression of baseline and posttreatment MRI: T, N, extramural venous invasion (EMVI), circumferential resection margin, craniocaudal length <5 cm, and MRI tumor height ≤5 cm were used to identify independent predictor(s) for response. An association between induction chemotherapy and EMVI status was analyzed. Survival outcomes for pathologic and MRI responders and nonresponders were analyzed.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one patients were eligible; 114 (41%) patients were pathology responders. Baseline MRI negative EMVI (odds ratio 2.94, P=.007), tumor height ≤5 cm (OR 1.96, P=.02), and mrEMVI status change (positive to negative) following CRT (OR 3.09, P<.001) were the only predictors for response. There was a strong association detected between induction chemotherapy and ymrEMVI status change after CRT (OR 9.0, P<.003). ymrT0-2 gave a positive predictive value of 80% and OR of 9.1 for ypT0-2. ymrN stage accuracy of ypN stage was 75%. Three-year disease-free survival for pathology and MRI responders were similar at 80% and 79% and significantly better than poor responders.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor height and mrEMVI status are more important than baseline size and stage of the tumor as predictors of response to CRT. Both MRI- and pathologic-defined responders have significantly improved survival. "Good response" to CRT in locally advanced rectal cancer with ypT0-2 carries significantly better 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival. Use of induction chemotherapy for improving mrEMVI status and knowledge of MRI predictive factors could be taken into account in the pursuit of individualized neoadjuvant treatments for patients with rectal cancer.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24074924     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

1.  Systematic review of prognostic importance of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Manish Chand; Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Ian Swift; Gina Brown
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  How Should Imaging Direct/Orient Management of Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Jemma Bhoday; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Anita Wale; Gina Brown
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

3.  Can Post-Treatment MRI Features Predict Pathological Circumferential Resection Margin (pCRM) Involvement in Low Rectal Tumors.

Authors:  A Patra; A D Baheti; S K Ankathi; A Desouza; R Engineer; V Ostwal; A Ramaswamy; A Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-22

4.  The potential predictive value of MRI and PET-CT in mucinous and nonmucinous rectal cancer to identify patients at high risk of metastatic disease.

Authors:  Brunella Barbaro; Lucia Leccisotti; Fabio M Vecchio; Marialuisa Di Matteo; Teresa Serra; Marco Salsano; Andrea Poscia; Claudio Coco; Roberto Persiani; Sergio Alfieri; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessandro Giordano; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Morphologic predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Chongda Zhang; Feng Ye; Yuan Liu; Han Ouyang; Xinming Zhao; Hongmei Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 6.  MRI Evaluation of Complete Response of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Current Status and Future Trends.

Authors:  Qiaoyu Xu; Yanyan Xu; Hongliang Sun; Tao Jiang; Sheng Xie; Bee Yen Ooi; Yi Ding
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Stratified Prognostic Value of Pathological Response to Preoperative Treatment in yp II/III Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yanpeng Yang; Hao Xu; Guowei Chen; Yisheng Pan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Associations between clinical characteristics and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiaolin Pang; Yuanhong Gao; Hanchen Yi; Hailing Liu; Shuai Liu; Jian Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 9.  New Perspectives on Predictive Biomarkers of Tumor Response and Their Clinical Application in Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Nam Kyu Kim; Hyuk Hur
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 10.  MRI-detected extramural venous invasion of rectal cancer: Multimodality performance and implications at baseline imaging and after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Shannon P Sheedy; Jay P Heiken; Payam Mohammadinejad; Rondell P Graham; Hee Eun Lee; Scott R Kelley; Stephanie L Hansel; David H Bruining; Jeff L Fidler; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.