Catherine Riffin1, Jennifer L Wolff2, John Butterworth3, Ronald D Adelman4, Karl A Pillemer5. 1. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA. Electronic address: acr2213@med.cornell.edu. 2. Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA; Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA; Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA. 5. Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Older adults are commonly accompanied to routine medical visits. This study identifies challenges and explores approaches to managing patient-family interactions in primary care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary care clinicians and staff (N = 30) as well as older adult patients and family caregivers (N = 40). Interviews were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Three major challenges to patient-family interactions were identified: navigating patient autonomy and family motivation to participate; adjudicating patient-family disagreements; and minimizing obtrusive behaviors by caregivers. Three approaches to managing patient-family interactions were identified. Collaborating involved non-judgmental listening, consensus-building, and validation of different perspectives. Dividing involved separating the patient and family member to elicit confidential information from one member of the dyad. Focusing involved re-directing the conversation to either the patient or family member while minimizing input from the other. Approaches varied by patients' cognitive status and overall health condition. In general, patients and caregivers expressed the most positive attitudes toward collaborating and patient-directed focusing approaches. CONCLUSION: Primary care clinicians use varied approaches to managing their interactions with patient-family dyads. Patients and caregivers generally prefer those approaches that involve collaborative rather than individual discussions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest the potential for the development of communication-focused interventions to promote positive clinician-patient-family interactions.
OBJECTIVE: Older adults are commonly accompanied to routine medical visits. This study identifies challenges and explores approaches to managing patient-family interactions in primary care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary care clinicians and staff (N = 30) as well as older adult patients and family caregivers (N = 40). Interviews were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Three major challenges to patient-family interactions were identified: navigating patient autonomy and family motivation to participate; adjudicating patient-family disagreements; and minimizing obtrusive behaviors by caregivers. Three approaches to managing patient-family interactions were identified. Collaborating involved non-judgmental listening, consensus-building, and validation of different perspectives. Dividing involved separating the patient and family member to elicit confidential information from one member of the dyad. Focusing involved re-directing the conversation to either the patient or family member while minimizing input from the other. Approaches varied by patients' cognitive status and overall health condition. In general, patients and caregivers expressed the most positive attitudes toward collaborating and patient-directed focusing approaches. CONCLUSION: Primary care clinicians use varied approaches to managing their interactions with patient-family dyads. Patients and caregivers generally prefer those approaches that involve collaborative rather than individual discussions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggest the potential for the development of communication-focused interventions to promote positive clinician-patient-family interactions.
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Debra L Roter; Jeremy Barron; Cynthia M Boyd; Bruce Leff; Thomas E Finucane; Joseph J Gallo; Peter V Rabins; David L Roth; Laura N Gitlin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joan M Griffin; Catherine Riffin; Rachel D Havyer; Virginia S Biggar; Meryl Comer; Theresa L Frangiosa; Lauren R Bangerter Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2019-10-11
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Debra L Roter; Cynthia M Boyd; David L Roth; Diane M Echavarria; Jennifer Aufill; Judith B Vick; Laura N Gitlin Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: R C Laidsaar-Powell; P N Butow; S Bu; C Charles; A Gafni; W W T Lam; J Jansen; K J McCaffery; H L Shepherd; M H N Tattersall; I Juraskova Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2013-01-17
Authors: Jasneet Parmar; Sharon Anderson; Marjan Abbasi; Saeed Ahmadinejad; Karenn Chan; Lesley Charles; Bonnie Dobbs; Amandeep Sheny Khera; Jennifer Stickney-Lee; Peter George J Tian; Suvidha Jain Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Isabel María Fernández-Medina; María Dolores Ruíz-Fernández; Felisa Gálvez-Ramírez; Evangelina Martínez-Mengíbar; Manuel Eduardo Ruíz-García; María Del Mar Jiménez-Lasserrotte; Ángela María Ortega-Galán; José Manuel Hernández-Padilla Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2021-12-23