Jennifer L Wolff1, Debra L Roter2, Cynthia M Boyd3, David L Roth3, Diane M Echavarria4, Jennifer Aufill4, Judith B Vick5, Laura N Gitlin6. 1. Roger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. jwolff2@jhu.edu. 2. Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Roger C. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Edward D. Miller Research Building, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Establishing priorities for discussion during time-limited primary care visits is challenging in the care of patients with cognitive impairment. These patients commonly attend primary care visits with a family companion. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a patient-family agenda setting intervention improves primary care visit communication for patients with cognitive impairment DESIGN: Two-group pilot randomized controlled study PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 + with cognitive impairment and family companions (n = 93 dyads) and clinicians (n = 14) from two general and one geriatrics primary care clinic INTERVENTION: A self-administered paper-pencil checklist to clarify the role of the companion and establish a shared visit agenda MEASUREMENTS: Patient-centered communication (primary); verbal activity, information disclosure including discussion of memory, and visit duration (secondary), from audio recordings of visit discussion RESULTS: Dyads were randomized to usual care (n = 44) or intervention (n = 49). Intervention participants endorsed an active communication role for companions to help patients understand what the clinician says or means (90% of dyads), remind patients to ask questions or ask clinicians questions directly (84% of dyads), or listen and take notes (82% of dyads). Intervention dyads identified 4.4 health issues for the agenda on average: patients more often identified memory (59.2 versus 38.8%; p = 0.012) and mood (42.9 versus 24.5%; p = 0.013) whereas companions more often identified safety (36.7 versus 18.4%; p = 0.039) and personality/behavior change (32.7 versus 16.3%; p = 0.011). Communication was significantly more patient-centered in intervention than in control visits at general clinics (p < 0.001) and in pooled analyses (ratio of 0.86 versus 0.68; p = 0.046). At general clinics, intervention (versus control) dyads contributed more lifestyle and psychosocial talk (p < 0.001) and less biomedical talk (p < 0.001) and companions were more verbally active (p < 0.005). No intervention effects were found at the geriatrics clinic. No effect on memory discussions or visit duration was observed. CONCLUSION: Patient-family agenda setting may improve primary care visit communication for patients with cognitive impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02986958.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Establishing priorities for discussion during time-limited primary care visits is challenging in the care of patients with cognitive impairment. These patients commonly attend primary care visits with a family companion. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a patient-family agenda setting intervention improves primary care visit communication for patients with cognitive impairment DESIGN: Two-group pilot randomized controlled study PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 + with cognitive impairment and family companions (n = 93 dyads) and clinicians (n = 14) from two general and one geriatrics primary care clinic INTERVENTION: A self-administered paper-pencil checklist to clarify the role of the companion and establish a shared visit agenda MEASUREMENTS: Patient-centered communication (primary); verbal activity, information disclosure including discussion of memory, and visit duration (secondary), from audio recordings of visit discussion RESULTS: Dyads were randomized to usual care (n = 44) or intervention (n = 49). Intervention participants endorsed an active communication role for companions to help patients understand what the clinician says or means (90% of dyads), remind patients to ask questions or ask clinicians questions directly (84% of dyads), or listen and take notes (82% of dyads). Intervention dyads identified 4.4 health issues for the agenda on average: patients more often identified memory (59.2 versus 38.8%; p = 0.012) and mood (42.9 versus 24.5%; p = 0.013) whereas companions more often identified safety (36.7 versus 18.4%; p = 0.039) and personality/behavior change (32.7 versus 16.3%; p = 0.011). Communication was significantly more patient-centered in intervention than in control visits at general clinics (p < 0.001) and in pooled analyses (ratio of 0.86 versus 0.68; p = 0.046). At general clinics, intervention (versus control) dyads contributed more lifestyle and psychosocial talk (p < 0.001) and less biomedical talk (p < 0.001) and companions were more verbally active (p < 0.005). No intervention effects were found at the geriatrics clinic. No effect on memory discussions or visit duration was observed. CONCLUSION:Patient-family agenda setting may improve primary care visit communication for patients with cognitive impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02986958.
Entities:
Keywords:
cognitive impairment; dementia; family caregiving; health communication; primary care
Authors: Judith B Vick; Halima Amjad; Katherine C Smith; Cynthia M Boyd; Laura N Gitlin; David L Roth; Debra L Roter; Jennifer L Wolff Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Ladson Hinton; Carol E Franz; Geetha Reddy; Yvette Flores; Richard L Kravitz; Judith C Barker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-09-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Christine P Kowalski; Deanna B McQuillan; Neetu Chawla; Courtney Lyles; Andrea Altschuler; Connie S Uratsu; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Michele Heisler; Richard W Grant Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2018 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Ariel R Green; Jennifer L Wolff; Diane M Echavarria; Malcolm Chapman; Annie Phung; Devon Smith; Cynthia M Boyd Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Danny Scerpella; Kimberly Cockey; Naaz Hussain; Tara Funkhouser; Diane Echavarria; Jennifer Aufill; Amy Guo; Danetta H Sloan; Sydney M Dy; Kelly M Smith Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Ariel R Green; Cynthia M Boyd; Kathy S Gleason; Leslie Wright; Courtney R Kraus; Ruth Bedoy; Bianca Sanchez; Jonathan Norton; Orla C Sheehan; Jennifer L Wolff; Emily Reeve; Matthew L Maciejewski; Linda A Weffald; Elizabeth A Bayliss Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Krista L Harrison; Sarah B Garrett; Joni Gilissen; Michael J Terranova; Alissa Bernstein Sideman; Christine S Ritchie; Michael D Geschwind Journal: Prion Date: 2022-12 Impact factor: 3.931