Literature DB >> 33270989

Perioperative CRP: A novel inflammation-based classification in gastric cancer for recurrence and chemotherapy benefit.

Jun Lu1,2,3, Bin-Bin Xu1,2,3, Zhen Xue1,2,3, Jian-Wei Xie1,2,3, Chao-Hui Zheng1,2,3, Chang-Ming Huang1,2,3, Ping Li1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perioperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have effects on the prognosis of cancer patients. We intended to determine the prognostic value of combining the two for gastric cancer (GC).
METHODS: Data were extracted from a clinical trial. By calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and the C-index, the predictive value of CRPs among different time points, including preoperative (pre-CRP), postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 (post-CRPs), and postoperative maximum CRP (post-CRPmax ), was derived. Multivariate analysis was performed to further explore the independent variates for recurrence-free survival (RFS).
RESULTS: Finally, 401 patients were available in the present study. For RFS, higher AUC (0.692) and concordance index (0.678) of pre-CRP were observed when compared with those of post-CRPs. Further, among post-CRPs, post-CRPmax had the highest predictive values (AUC: 0.591; concordance index: 0.585) among the other post-CRPs. The threshold values in predicting RFS for pre-CRP and post-CRPmax were 3.1 mg/L and 77.1 mg/L. Multivariate analysis showed both pre-CRP≥3.1 mg/L (high-pre-CRP) and post-CRPmax ≥77.1 mg/L (high-post-CRPmax ) were risk factors for RFS. Postoperative chemotherapy benefit was further analyzed for patients with stage II/III GC and indicated that patients with pre-CRP<3.1 mg/L had better prognosis without benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), p = 0.557. In high-pre-CRP patients, only patients with post-CRPmax ≥77.1 mg/L but not post-CRPmax <77.1 mg/L benefited from postoperative ACT (RFS: 33.2% vs 49.9% for non-chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group, respectively, p = 0.037). Analyses for overall survival obtained the similar outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Both high-pre-CRP and high-post-CRPmax are associated with worse prognosis in GC. ACT seems to only improve the prognosis for stage II/III GC with pre-CRP≥3.1 mg/L and post-CRPmax ≥77.1 mg/L after radical gastrectomy. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the potential mechanism.
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; adjuvant chemotherapy; gastric cancer; prognosis; recurrence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33270989      PMCID: PMC7826470          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


  61 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of complications after curative surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Kubota; Naoki Hiki; Takeshi Sano; Shogo Nomura; Souya Nunobe; Koshi Kumagai; Susumu Aikou; Ryohei Watanabe; Toshiyuki Kosuga; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Decision curve analysis.

Authors:  Mark Fitzgerald; Benjamin R Saville; Roger J Lewis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  C-reactive protein on postoperative day 3 as a predictor of infectious complications following gastric cancer resection.

Authors:  Yuji Shishido; Kazumasa Fujitani; Kazuyoshi Yamamoto; Motohiro Hirao; Toshimasa Tsujinaka; Mitsugu Sekimoto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Prognostic impact of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein on patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tatsuo Shimura; Masahiko Shibata; Kenji Gonda; Yuko Murakami; Masaru Noda; Kazunoshin Tachibana; Noriko Abe; Tohru Ohtake
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with marginally elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values after D2 radical gastrectomy.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Xing-Yu Feng; Yuan-Fang Li; Bai-Wei Zhao; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Ying-Bo Chen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jae-Ho Cheong; Han-Kwang Yang; Hyunki Kim; Woo Ho Kim; Young-Woo Kim; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Young-Kyu Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Kyung Hee Lee; Mi Jin Gu; Ha Yan Kim; Jinae Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Soonwon Hong; Jong Won Kim; Yoon Young Choi; Woo Jin Hyung; Eunji Jang; Hyeseon Kim; Yong-Min Huh; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Microsatellite Instability and Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of the CLASSIC Randomized Controlled study.

Authors:  Yoon Young Choi; Hyunki Kim; Su-Jin Shin; Ha Yan Kim; Jinae Lee; Han-Kwang Yang; Woo Ho Kim; Young-Woo Kim; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Young Kyu Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Kyung Hee Lee; Mi Jin Gu; Seung Ho Choi; SoonWon Hong; Jong Won Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh; Jae-Ho Cheong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Importance of Normalization of CA19-9 Levels Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Localized Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Susan Tsai; Ben George; David Wittmann; Paul S Ritch; Ashley N Krepline; Mohammed Aldakkak; Chad A Barnes; Kathleen K Christians; Kulwinder Dua; Michael Griffin; Catherine Hagen; William A Hall; Beth A Erickson; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  A systematic review of the association between circulating concentrations of C reactive protein and cancer.

Authors:  Katriina Heikkilä; Shah Ebrahim; Debbie A Lawlor
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 7.370

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perioperative CRP: A novel inflammation-based classification in gastric cancer for recurrence and chemotherapy benefit.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Bin-Bin Xu; Zhen Xue; Jian-Wei Xie; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.452

2.  C-Reactive Protein as a Prognostic Biomarker for Gynecologic Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yingying Yang; Xiu Li; Hui Qian; Guangci Di; Ruhua Zhou; Yuwei Dong; Wenyue Chen; Qingling Ren
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-10-11

Review 3.  Taiwan Society of Colon and Rectum Surgeons (TSCRS) Consensus for Anti-Inflammatory Nutritional Intervention in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Cheng-Jen Ma; Wan-Hsiang Hu; Meng-Chuan Huang; Jy-Ming Chiang; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Huann-Sheng Wang; Chien-Ling Chiang; Hui-Min Hsieh; Chou-Chen Chen; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.