AIM: To investigate the clinical significance of the postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy and to identify the prognostic factors for patients with marginally elevated postoperative CEA levels. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 480 patients who were histologically diagnosed with gastric cancer and who underwent D2 radical surgery at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2009. The follow-up lasted until June 2011. Chi-squared tests and Kaplan-Meier methods were employed to compare the adverse events and prognoses. RESULTS: In this group of gastric cancer patients, the postoperative serum CEA level (P = 0.002) was an independent prognostic factor; the same was true for the histological T and N staging (P < 0.001 and P = 0.045, respectively). In the group of marginally elevated postoperative CEA level gastric cancer patients, univariate analysis demonstrated that tumor position (P = 0.042); histological grade (P = 0.002); and Boarrmann type (P = 0.003) were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis showed that the tumor position (P = 0.003) and histological grade (P = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for these patients. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that patients with normal postoperative CEA levels have a better prognosis. Furthermore, for marginally elevated postoperative CEA level gastric cancer patients, the tumor position and histological grade were two important factors for predicting the prognosis and the need for aggressive therapy.
AIM: To investigate the clinical significance of the postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in gastric cancerpatients who underwent D2 radical gastrectomy and to identify the prognostic factors for patients with marginally elevated postoperative CEA levels. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 480 patients who were histologically diagnosed with gastric cancer and who underwent D2 radical surgery at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2009. The follow-up lasted until June 2011. Chi-squared tests and Kaplan-Meier methods were employed to compare the adverse events and prognoses. RESULTS: In this group of gastric cancerpatients, the postoperative serum CEA level (P = 0.002) was an independent prognostic factor; the same was true for the histological T and N staging (P < 0.001 and P = 0.045, respectively). In the group of marginally elevated postoperative CEA level gastric cancerpatients, univariate analysis demonstrated that tumor position (P = 0.042); histological grade (P = 0.002); and Boarrmann type (P = 0.003) were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis showed that the tumor position (P = 0.003) and histological grade (P = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for these patients. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that patients with normal postoperative CEA levels have a better prognosis. Furthermore, for marginally elevated postoperative CEA level gastric cancerpatients, the tumor position and histological grade were two important factors for predicting the prognosis and the need for aggressive therapy.
Authors: Eui Soo Han; Han Hong Lee; Jun Suh Lee; Kyo Young Song; Cho Hyun Park; Hae Myung Jeon Journal: J Gastric Cancer Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 3.720