Literature DB >> 33269605

Accuracy of MRI-Based Talar Cartilage Thickness Measurement and Talus Bone and Cartilage Modeling: Comparison with Ground-Truth Laser Scan Measurements.

Carly A Lockard1, Ingrid K Stake1,2, Alex W Brady1, Madeleine G DeClercq1, Kira K Tanghe1, Brenton W Douglass1, Erik Nott3, Charles P Ho1, Thomas O Clanton3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to compare measurements of talar cartilage thickness and cartilage and bone surface geometry from clinically feasible magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) against high-accuracy laser scan models. Measurement of talar bone and cartilage geometry from MRI would provide useful information for evaluating cartilage changes, selecting osteochondral graft sources or creating patient-specific joint models.
DESIGN: Three-dimensional (3D) bone and cartilage models of 7 cadaver tali were created using (1) manual segmentation of high-resolution volumetric sequence 3T MR images and (2) laser scans. Talar cartilage thickness was compared between the laser scan- and MRI-based models for the dorsal, medial, and lateral surfaces. The laser scan- and MRI-based cartilage and bone surface models were compared using model-to-model distance.
RESULTS: Average cartilage thickness within the dorsal, medial, and lateral surfaces were 0.89 to 1.05 mm measured with laser scanning, and 1.10 to 1.22 mm measured with MRI. MRI-based thickness was 0.16 to 0.32 mm higher on average in each region. The average absolute surface-to-surface differences between laser scan- and MRI-based bone and cartilage models ranged from 0.16 to 0.22 mm for bone (MRI bone models smaller than laser scan models) and 0.35 to 0.38 mm for cartilage (MRI bone models larger than laser scan models).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that cartilage and bone 3D modeling and measurement of average cartilage thickness on the dorsal, medial, and lateral talar surfaces using MRI were feasible and provided similar model geometry and thickness values to ground-truth laser scan-based measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D model; MRI; cartilage; laser scan; talus

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33269605      PMCID: PMC8808841          DOI: 10.1177/1947603520976774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   3.117


  38 in total

1.  Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing.

Authors:  T M Lehmann; C Gönner; K Spitzer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Regional variation of ankle and hindfoot cartilage T2 mapping values at 3 T: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Carly A Lockard; Angela Chang; Richard C Shin; Thomas O Clanton; Charles P Ho
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Christa Boer; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  T1rho and T2 mapping of ankle cartilage of female and male ballet dancers.

Authors:  Saya Horiuchi; Hon J Yu; Alex Luk; Adam Rudd; Jimmy Ton; Edward Kuoy; Jeffrey A Russell; Kelli Sharp; Hiroshi Yoshioka
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb.

Authors:  D E Shepherd; B B Seedhom
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Validation of a method for combining biplanar radiography and magnetic resonance imaging to estimate knee cartilage contact.

Authors:  Eric Thorhauer; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Three-dimensional geometric analysis of the talus for designing talar prosthetics.

Authors:  Kamrul Islam; Ashlee Dobbe; Kajsa Duke; Marwan El-Rich; Sukhvinder Dhillon; Samer Adeeb; Nadr M Jomha
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 1.617

8.  Microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: outcome analysis and outcome predictors of 105 cases.

Authors:  Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong; Eric M Berkson; George H Theodore
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  In vivo cartilage contact deformation of human ankle joints under full body weight.

Authors:  Lu Wan; Richard J de Asla; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Cartilage repair of the ankle: first results of T2 mapping at 7.0 T after microfracture and matrix associated autologous cartilage transplantation.

Authors:  S E Domayer; S Apprich; D Stelzeneder; C Hirschfeld; M Sokolowski; C Kronnerwetter; C Chiari; R Windhager; S Trattnig
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  2 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Quantification of Cam Resection Using MRI Bone Models: A Comparison of 2 Techniques.

Authors:  Thomas D Alter; Derrick M Knapik; Martina Guidetti; Alejandro Espinoza; Jorge Chahla; Shane J Nho; Philip Malloy
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Three-Dimensional Measures of Bony Resection During Femoral Osteochondroplasty Are Related to Alpha Angle Measures: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Thomas D Alter; Philip Malloy; Alex C Newhouse; Sunikom Suppauksorn; Alejandro Espinzoa Orias; Jorge Chahla; Nozomu Inoue; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.