Literature DB >> 18182210

Microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: outcome analysis and outcome predictors of 105 cases.

Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong1, Eric M Berkson, George H Theodore.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes and outcome predictors of arthroscopic debridement with osteochondral bone stimulation (microfracture) for osteochondral lesions of the ankle.
METHODS: One hundred five consecutive patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle who underwent ankle arthroscopy with microfracture were prospectively followed up for a mean of 31.6 +/- 12.1 months. Study patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and annually after surgery. Assessments via a visual analog scale for pain during daily activities and sport activity, the Roles and Maudsley score, and the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle and hindfoot scoring system were obtained at each visit. Outcome predictors were analyzed by logistic regression model.
RESULTS: There were no failures of treatment with lesions smaller than 15 mm. In contrast, only 1 patient met the criteria for success in the group of lesions greater than 15 mm. Statistical analysis revealed that increasing age, higher body mass index, history of trauma, and presence of osteophytes negatively affected outcome. The presence of instability and the presence of anterolateral soft-tissue scar were correlated with a successful outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found a strong correlation between lesion size and success across its entire population. For lesions smaller than 15 mm, regardless of location, excellent results were obtained. In addition, increasing age, higher body mass index, history of trauma, and presence of osteophytes negatively affect outcome. The presence of instability and anterolateral soft-tissue scar correlated with a successful outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series, prognostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18182210     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  94 in total

Review 1.  Football injuries of the ankle: A review of injury mechanisms, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Raymond J Walls; Keir A Ross; Ethan J Fraser; Christopher W Hodgkins; Niall A Smyth; Christopher J Egan; James Calder; John G Kennedy
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-01-18

2.  Arthroscopic microfracture vs. arthroscopic autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus.

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Michael Alexander Malahias; Moataz Mahmoud Ali; Nicola Maffulli; Hajo Thermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Ankle Arthroscopy With Microfracture for Osteochondral Defects of the Talus.

Authors:  Suman Medda; Ian M Al'Khafaji; Aaron T Scott
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-02-06

4.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic subchondral drilling and microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Authors:  Jun-Ik Choi; Keun-Bae Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Critical three-dimensional factors affecting outcome in osteochondral lesion of the talus.

Authors:  Chayanin Angthong; Ichiro Yoshimura; Kazuki Kanazawa; Akinori Takeyama; Tomonobu Hagio; Takahiro Ida; Masatoshi Naito
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of cartilage repair after microfracture (MF) treatment for adult unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) in the ankle: correlations with clinical outcome.

Authors:  Hongyue Tao; Xiliang Shang; Rong Lu; Hong Li; Yinghui Hua; Xiaoyuan Feng; Shuang Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Potential pitfall in the microfracturing technique during the arthroscopic treatment of an osteochondral lesion.

Authors:  Christiaan J A van Bergen; Peter A J de Leeuw; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Authors:  Keun-Bae Lee; Long-Bin Bai; Jae-Yoon Chung; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  [Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. Diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  A Preiss; M Heitmann; K-H Frosch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields after arthroscopic treatment for osteochondral defects of the talus: double-blind randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Authors:  Christiaan J A van Bergen; Leendert Blankevoort; Rob J de Haan; Inger N Sierevelt; Duncan E Meuffels; Pieter R N d'Hooghe; Rover Krips; Geert van Damme; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.