| Literature DB >> 33266455 |
Natalia Drobnicka1, Katarzyna Sutor1, Agnieszka Kumorkiewicz-Jamro1, Aneta Spórna-Kucab1, Michał Antonik1, Ewa Dziedzic2, Tomasz Świergosz1, Joanna Ortyl3,4, Sławomir Wybraniec1.
Abstract
Herein, the generation of decarboxylated derivatives of gomphrenin pigments exhibiting potential health-promoting properties and the kinetics of their extraction during tea brewing from the purple flowers of Gomphrena globosa L. in aqueous and aqueous citric acid solutions were investigated. Time-dependent concentration monitoring of natural gomphrenins and their tentative identification was carried out by LC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS. The high content of acylated gomphrenins and their principal decarboxylation products, 2-, 15-, 17-decarboxy-gomphrenins, along with minor levels of their bidecarboxylated derivatives, were reported in the infusions. The identification was supported by the determination of molecular formulas of the extracted pigments by liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LCMS-IT-TOF). The influence of plant matrix on gomphrenins' stability and generation of their derivatives, including the extraction kinetics, was determined by studying the concentration profiles in the primary and diluted infusions. Isolated and purified acylated gomphrenins from the same plant material were used for the preliminary determination of their decarboxylated derivatives. The acylated gomphrenins were found to be more stable than nonacylated ones. Citric acid addition had a degradative influence on natural gomphrenins mainly during the longer tea brewing process (above 15 min); however, the presence of plant matrix significantly increased the stability for betacyanins' identification.Entities:
Keywords: LCMS-IT-TOF; decarboxylation; functional food; gomphrenins; infusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33266455 PMCID: PMC7700562 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1LCMS gomphrenin profiles (A–D) recorded in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode of the freeze-dried representative extract obtained from purple G. globosa flowers and chemical structures of natural gomphrenins present in the extract which undergo decarboxylation during the tea brewing process leading to obtaining products which had their abbreviations placed. The LC-DAD fingerprint (λ 545 nm) of the betacyanin extract is also depicted for an indication of the pigments (E).
Chromatographic, spectrophotometric, and mass spectrometric data of the analysed natural gomphrenins and their derivatives in G. globosa floral extracts after tea brewing at 90 °C.
| No. | Compound | Abbreviation | Rt [min] | λmax | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| gomphrenin | Gp | 4.0 | 538 | 551 |
|
| isogomphrenin | IGp | 4.2 | 538 | 551 |
|
| 17-decarboxy-gomphrenin | 17-dGp | 4.1 | 507 | 507 |
|
| 17-decarboxy-isogomphrenin | 17-dIGp | 4.4 | 507 | 507 |
|
| 15-decarboxy-gomphrenin | 15-dGp | 4.8 | 530 | 507 |
|
| 2-decarboxy-gomphrenin | 2-dGp | 5.3 | 533 | 507 |
|
| cis-feruloyl-gomphrenin | cis-Fer-Gp | 11.4 | 545 | 727 |
|
| cis-feruloyl-isogomphrenin | cis-Fer-IGp | 12.9 | 545 | 727 |
|
| feruloyl-gomphrenin | Fer-Gp | 16.3 | 545 | 727 |
|
| feruloyl-isogomphrenin | Fer-IGp | 23.5 | 545 | 727 |
|
| cis-feruloyl-17-decarboxy-gomphrenin | cis-Fer-17-dGp | 12.9 | 515 | 683 |
|
| cis-feruloyl-17-decarboxy-isogomphrenin | cis-Fer-17-dIGp | 15.2 | 515 | 683 |
|
| feruloyl-17-decarboxy-gomphrenin | Fer-17-dGp | 17.5 | 515 | 683 |
|
| cis-feruloyl-2,17-bidecarboxy-gomphrenin | cis-Fer-2,17-dGp | 21.4 | 509 | 639 |
|
| feruloyl-2-decarboxy-gomphrenin | Fer-2-dGp | 21.6 | 537 | 683 |
|
| feruloyl-17-decarboxy-isogomphrenin | Fer-17-dIGp | 24.0 | 515 | 683 |
|
| feruloyl-2,17-bidecarboxy-gomphrenin | Fer-2,17-dGp | 24.1 | 520 | 639 |
|
| feruloyl-2-decarboxy-isogomphrenin | Fer-2-dIGp | 27.9 | 537 | 683 |
|
| feruloyl-15-decarboxy-gomphrenin | Fer-15-dGp | 30.4 | 530 | 683 |
|
| feruloyl-2,17-bidecarboxy-isogomphrenin | Fer-2,17-dIGp | 31.0 | 520 | 639 |
|
| cis-coumaroyl-gomphrenin | cis-Coum-Gp | 11.2 | 545 | 697 |
|
| cis-coumaroyl-isogomphrenin | cis-Coum-IGp | 12.8 | 545 | 697 |
|
| coumaroyl-gomphrenin | Coum-Gp | 16.1 | 545 | 697 |
|
| coumaroyl-isogomphrenin | Coum-IGp | 21.5 | 545 | 697 |
|
| cis-coumaroyl-17-decarboxy-gomphrenin | cis-Coum-17-dGp | 12.9 | 512 | 653 |
|
| cis-coumaroyl-17-decarboxy-isogomphrenin | cis-Coum-17-dIGp | 15.0 | 512 | 653 |
|
| coumaroyl-17-decarboxy-gomphrenin | Coum-17-dGp | 17.4 | 512 | 653 |
|
| coumaroyl-2-decarboxy-gomphrenin | Coum-2-dGp | 22.5 | 539 | 653 |
|
| coumaroyl-17-decarboxy-isogomphrenin | Coum-17-dIGp | 22.8 | 512 | 653 |
|
| coumaroyl-2,17-bidecarboxy-gomphrenin | Coum-2,17-dGp | 26.1 | 515 | 609 |
|
| coumaroyl-2-decarboxy-isogomphrenin | Coum-2-dIGp | 28.8 | 539 | 653 |
|
| coumaroyl-15-decarboxy-gomphrenin | Coum-15-dGp | 31.0 | 532 | 653 |
|
| coumaroyl-2,17-bidecarboxy-isogomphrenin | Coum-2,17-dIGp | 31.9 | 515 | 609 |
|
| sinapoyl-gomphrenin | Sin-Gp | 15.4 | 545 | 757 |
|
| sinapoyl-isogomphrenin | Sin-IGp | 23.6 | 545 | 757 |
|
| sinapoyl-17-decarboxy-gomphrenin | Sin-17-dGp | 17.1 | 517 | 713 |
|
| sinapoyl-2-decarboxy-gomphrenin | Sin-2-dGp | 19.3 | 536 | 713 |
|
| sinapoyl-2,17-bidecarboxy-gomphrenin a | Sin-2,17-dGp | 21.6 | - b | 669 |
|
| sinapoyl-2,17-bidecarboxy-isogomphrenin a | Sin-2,17-dIGp | 22.4 | - b | 669 |
|
| sinapoyl-17-decarboxy-isogomphrenin | Sin-17-dIGp | 24.0 | 517 | 713 |
|
| sinapoyl-2-decarboxy-isogomphrenin | Sin-2-dIGp | 26.2 | 536 | 713 |
|
| sinapoyl-15-decarboxy-gomphrenin a | Sin-15-dGp | 29.7 | - b | 713 |
a—Tentatively identified. b—Due to coelution with impurities, observation of λmax was not possible.
Figure 2Fragmentation pattern obtained by LCMS-IT-TOF for purified Sin-Gp 20 isolated from purple G. globosa flowers.
High-resolution mass spectrometric data obtained by LCMS-IT-TOF measurements of purified acylated gomphrenins isolated from G. globosa flowers and their derivatives generated after heating of acylated gomphrenins at 90 °C in aqueous citric acid solutions.
| No. | Compound | Molecular Formula | [M + H]+ | [M + H]+ | Error [mDa] | Error [ppm] | Principal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| cis-Fer-Gp | C34H35N2O16 | 727.1947 | 727.1981 | −3.4 | −4.68 | 551; 389; 345 |
|
| Fer-Gp | C34H35N2O16 | 727.1970 | 727.1981 | −1.1 | −1.51 | 551; 389; 345 |
|
| cis-Fer-17-dGp | C33H35N2O14 | 683.2068 | 683.2083 | −1.5 | −2.20 | 507; 345 |
|
| Fer-17-dGp | C33H35N2O14 | 683.2081 | 683.2083 | −0.2 | −0.29 | 507; 345; 301 |
|
| Fer-2-dGp | C33H35N2O14 | 683.2075 | 683.2083 | −0.8 | −1.17 | 507; 345 |
|
| Fer-2,17-dGp | C32H35N2O12 | 639.2174 | 639.2185 | −1.1 | −1.72 | 463; 301, 257 |
|
| Fer-15-dGp | C33H35N2O14 | 683.2063 | 683.2083 | −2.0 | −2.93 | 507; 345; 301 |
|
| cis-Coum-Gp | C33H33N2O15 | 697.1886 | 697.1875 | 1.1 | 1.58 | 551; 389 |
|
| Coum-Gp | C33H33N2O15 | 697.1887 | 697.1875 | 1.2 | 1.72 | 551; 389; 345 |
|
| cis-Coum-17-dGp | C32H33N2O13 | 653.1960 | 653.1977 | −1.7 | −2.60 | 507; 345 |
|
| Coum-17-dGp | C32H33N2O13 | 653.1990 | 653.1977 | 1.3 | 1.99 | 507; 345; 301 |
|
| Coum-2,17-dGp | C31H33N2O11 | 609.2085 | 609.2079 | 0.6 | 0.98 | 463; 301; 257 |
|
| Sin-Gp | C35H37N2O17 | 757.2117 | 757.2087 | 3.0 | 3.96 | 551; 389; 345; 301 |
|
| Sin-17-dGp | C34H37N2O15 | 713.2205 | 713.2188 | 1.7 | 2.38 | 507; 345; 301 |
|
| Sin-2-dGp | C34H37N2O15 | 713.2156 | 713.2188 | −3.2 | −4.49 | 507; 345; 301 |
Figure 3Visible spectra of aqueous (A and B) and citric acid (C and D) infusions of G. globosa flowers obtained within 60 min of tea brewing at 90 °C.
Figure 4HPLC profiles (λ 500 nm) of acylated gomphrenin and gomphrenin-based derivatives (A and B) in 5× diluted tea infusions of purple G. globosa flowers obtained in aqueous (A) and citric acid solutions (B) after 30 min of brewing at 90 °C, as well as referential HPLC profiles of purified feruloylated (C), coumaroylated (D), and sinapoylated (E) gomphrenin derivatives obtained after 20 min (C and D) and 10 min (E) of heating at 90 °C in citric acid solutions.
Figure 5Time-dependent concentration profiles of gomphrenins and acylated gomphrenins obtained after brewing purple G. globosa flowers at 90 °C in undiluted (A,C,E,G) and 5× diluted (B,D,F,H) aqueous and citric acid solutions. Standard deviation values (SD) of nonacylated pigments 1/1′ in citric acid solutions were multiplied by a factor of 3 and 2 for undiluted (G) and diluted samples (H), respectively.
Figure 6Maxima of time-dependent concentration profiles of decarboxylated gomphrenin derivatives generated in the course of 60 min tea brewing experiments in aqueous and citric acid solutions at 90 °C.
Figure 7Fragmentation patterns obtained by LCMS-IT-TOF for Fer-17-dGp 8 (A) and Sin-17-dGp 21 (B) formed in the course of heating at 90 °C for 20 min of isolated Fer-Gp 6 and Sin-Gp 20 from G. globosa flowers.
Figure 8Time-dependent concentration profiles of 17-decarbooxy-derivatives of nonacylated gomphrenin (A) and feruloylated, coumaroylated, and sinapoylated gomphrenins (B–D, respectively) generated during brewing of purple G. globosa flowers at 90 °C in undiluted and 5× diluted aqueous and citric acid solutions. These data represent time-dependent concentration of generated of 2-, 15-, and 2,17-decarboxy-gomphrenins. For clarity, calculated SD values for aqueous solutions were divided by a factor of 2 for 17-dGp (A) in undiluted aqueous solution of citric acid and diluted aqueous solutions and by a factor of 2 and 5 for Coum-17-dGp in undiluted aqueous and citric acid samples, respectively (C).
Figure 9Time-dependent concentration ratio CR of generated feruloylated (A and B), coumaroylated (C and D) and sinapoylated (H) as well as non-acylated (E–G) decarboxylated derivatives to their corresponding natural gomphrenins during G. globosa thermal processing at 90 °C. The ratios obtained for diluted citric acid samples after 60 min are not shown for most compounds due to a very high degradation rate of natural gomphrenins in citric acid solutions.