| Literature DB >> 33262737 |
Zhimin Wu1, Senjie Xiong2, Xiaochuan Sun1, Quanhong Shi1, Wei Dan1, Yan Zhan1, Yanfeng Xie1, Li Jiang1.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effects of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) on the cerebral oxygen saturation of patients after traumatic brain injury (TBI).Entities:
Keywords: APOE; TBI; cerebral oxygen saturation; near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS); regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2)
Year: 2020 PMID: 33262737 PMCID: PMC7688473 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.539627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
APOE genotype determination.
| VIC | FAM | 526T/T,388T/T | |
| FAM/VIC | FAM | 526C/T,388T/T | |
| FAM/VIC | FAM/VIC | 526C/T,388T/C | |
| FAM | FAM | 526C/C,388T/T | |
| FAM | FAM/VIC | 526C/C,388T/C | |
| FAM | VIC | 526C/C,388C/C | |
Figure 1APOE genotype of the subjects was identified as ε2/ε4. (A) APOEε2 gene locus FAM channel (+) VIC channel (+), (B) APOEε4 gene locus FAM channel (+) VIC channel (+). Polymerase chain reaction multiple fluorescence quantitative determination (QF-PCR) was utilized in the present study.
APOE genotypes and allele frequencies in the TBI group and the normal group.
| TBI Group ( | 4 | 11 | 4 | 81 | 9 | 5 | 10.09 | 79.82 | 10.09 |
| Normal Group ( | 2 | 4 | 2 | 39 | 5 | 2 | 9.26 | 80.56 | 10.18 |
Comparison of characteristics in 54 normal subjects and their condition.
| Sex | |||
| Male | 23 | 4 | 0.669 |
| Female | 25 | 2 | |
| Alcohol-drinking | |||
| Yes | 20 | 3 | 1.000 |
| No | 28 | 3 | |
| Smoking | |||
| Yes | 19 | 1 | 0.395 |
| No | 29 | 5 |
Comparison of clinical data of ε4 non-carriers and ε4 carriers in TBI patients.
| Gender | |||
| Male | 56 | 11 | 0.826 |
| Female | 40 | 7 | |
| Age (year) | |||
| <45 | 36 | 4 | 0.191 |
| 45–60 | 42 | 9 | |
| >60 | 18 | 5 | |
| Alcohol-drinking | |||
| Yes | 51 | 10 | 0.850 |
| No | 45 | 8 | |
| Smoking | |||
| Yes | 28 | 9 | 0.083 |
| No | 68 | 9 | |
| Hypertension | |||
| Yes | 29 | 7 | 0.467 |
| No | 67 | 11 | |
| Diabetes | |||
| Yes | 16 | 4 | 0.570 |
| No | 80 | 14 | |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | |||
| <120 | 18 | 2 | 0.848 |
| 120–150 | 53 | 12 | |
| >150 | 25 | 4 |
Figure 2The rScO2 (55.06 ± 7.60)% of the TBI group was significantly lower than that of the normal group (67.21 ± 7.80)% (*P < 0.05). (A) Shows the distribution of data in two groups, (B) indicates the mean ± standard division.
Independent risk factors affecting rScO2 in the TBI group by single-factor and multi-factor logistic regression analysis.
| Gender | 0.184 | ||||
| Male | 53 | 14 | |||
| Female | 32 | 15 | |||
| Age (year) | 0.936 | ||||
| <45 | 31 | 10 | |||
| 45–60 | 36 | 14 | |||
| >60 | 18 | 5 | |||
| Genotype | <0.001 | 0.013 | 6.742 (1.364–30.125) | ||
| | 7 | 11 | |||
| | 78 | 18 | |||
| Injury mechanism | 0.639 | ||||
| Striking injury | 22 | 7 | |||
| Traffic injury | 32 | 14 | |||
| Falling or others | 31 | 8 | |||
| GCS | 0.001 | 0.041 | 4.591 (1.587–19.512) | ||
| <8 | 16 | 10 | |||
| 9–12 | 26 | 15 | |||
| 13–15 | 43 | 4 | |||
| Marshall CT Class | 0.013 | 0.007 | 7.140 (0.775–22.145) | ||
| I (Normal CT) | 12 | 1 | |||
| II (cisterns present, shift <5 mm) | 20 | 2 | |||
| III (cisterns compressed, shift <5 mm) | 11 | 2 | |||
| IV (shift>5 mm) | 9 | 10 | |||
| V (evacuated mass) | 21 | 6 | |||
| VI (non-evacuated mass) | 12 | 8 | |||
| Smoking | 0.075 | ||||
| Yes | 23 | 13 | |||
| No | 62 | 16 | |||
| Alcohol-drinking | 0.835 | ||||
| Yes | 45 | 15 | |||
| No | 40 | 14 | |||
| Hypertension | 0.002 | 0.023 | 4.462 (1.228–16.239) | ||
| Yes | 20 | 16 | |||
| No | 65 | 13 | |||
| Diabetes | 0.280 | ||||
| Yes | 13 | 7 | |||
| No | 72 | 22 | |||
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 0.371 | ||||
| <120 | 16 | 4 | |||
| 120–150 | 49 | 16 | |||
| >150 | 20 | 9 | |||
Mean rScO2 of ε4 Non-carriers and ε4 Carriers in TBI group and normal group.
| TBI | 60.33 ± 7.12 | 52.23 ± 8.02 | <0.001 | 18/95 (18.95%) | 11/19 (57.89%) | 0.001 |
| Normal | 68.37 ± 5.56 | 68.75 ± 5.49 | 0.851 | 2/45 (4.44%) | 1/9 (11.11%) | 0.428 |
Mean ± standard division.
Figure 3The rScO2 of ε4 carriers in the TBI group was significantly lower than that of ε4 non-carriers, which was statistically significant (*P < 0.05). However, the rScO2 of ε4 carriers in the normal control group did not show a significant decrease compared with ε4 non-carriers (#P > 0.05) in (A,B).