Literature DB >> 33261397

Effect of masks on speech intelligibility in auralized classrooms.

Pasquale Bottalico1, Silvia Murgia1, Giuseppina Emma Puglisi2, Arianna Astolfi2, Karen Iler Kirk1.   

Abstract

This study explored the effects of wearing face masks on classroom communication. The effects of three different types of face masks (fabric, surgical, and N95 masks) on speech intelligibility (SI) presented to college students in auralized classrooms were evaluated. To simulate realistic classroom conditions, speech stimuli were presented in the presence of speech-shaped noise with a signal-to-noise ratio of +3 dB under two different reverberation times (0.4 s and 3.1 s). The use of fabric masks yielded a significantly greater reduction in SI compared to the other masks. Therefore, surgical masks or N95 masks are recommended in teaching environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33261397      PMCID: PMC7857496          DOI: 10.1121/10.0002450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  J S Bradley; R D Reich; S G Norcross
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms.

Authors:  Arianna Astolfi; Pasquale Bottalico; Giulio Barbato
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

4.  Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Shorter Sentence Length Maximizes Intelligibility and Speech Motor Performance in Persons With Dysarthria Due to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Kristen M Allison; Yana Yunusova; Jordan R Green
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Speech intelligibility assessment of protective facemasks and air-purifying respirators.

Authors:  Andrew J Palmiero; Daniel Symons; Judge W Morgan; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Speech understanding using surgical masks: a problem in health care?

Authors:  Lisa Lucks Mendel; Julie A Gardino; Samuel R Atcherson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Lip reading role in the hearing aid fitting process.

Authors:  Ana Helena Bannwart Dell'Aringa; Elisabeth Satico Adachi; Alfredo Rafael Dell'Aringa
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb
  8 in total
  16 in total

Review 1.  The contribution of respiratory and hearing protection use to psychological distress in the workplace: a scoping review.

Authors:  Richard Leung; Margaret M Cook; Mike F Capra; Kelly R Johnstone
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.851

2.  Face Masks Impact Auditory and Audiovisual Consonant Recognition in Children With and Without Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Emily Buss; Margaret K Miller; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  Early Word Segmentation Behind the Mask.

Authors:  Sónia Frota; Jovana Pejovic; Marisa Cruz; Cátia Severino; Marina Vigário
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  Influence of Protective Face Coverings on the Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Teresa G Vos; Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; Meredith A Rooth; Andrea L Bucker; Sarah Dillon; Adrienne Pearson; Kristen Quinones; Margaret E Richter; Noelle Roth; Allison Young; Matthew M Dedmon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.970

5.  Self-Perceived Voice Handicap During COVID19 Compulsory Facemask Use: A Comparative Study Between Portuguese and Spanish Speakers.

Authors:  Nuria Polo; Filipa M B Lã
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Virus (COVID-19) Preventative Measures on Communication: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ilze Oosthuizen; Gabrielle H Saunders; Vinaya Manchaiah; De Wet Swanepoel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-28

7.  Acoustic Effect of Face Mask Design and Material Choice.

Authors:  B T Balamurali; Tan Enyi; Christopher Johann Clarke; Sim Yuh Harn; Jer-Ming Chen
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Face masks and speaking style affect audio-visual word recognition and memory of native and non-native speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanic; Sandie Keerstock; Kirsten Meemann; Sarah M Ransom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Face mask type affects audiovisual speech intelligibility and subjective listening effort in young and older adults.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-07-18

Review 10.  [Impact of wearing face masks in public to prevent infectious diseases on the psychosocial development in children and adolescents: a systematic review].

Authors:  Alice Freiberg; Katy Horvath; Taurai Monalisa Hahne; Stephanie Drössler; Daniel Kämpf; Anke Spura; Bernhard Buhs; Nadine Reibling; Freia De Bock; Christian Apfelbacher; Andreas Seidler
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.