Literature DB >> 27362358

Speech intelligibility assessment of protective facemasks and air-purifying respirators.

Andrew J Palmiero1, Daniel Symons2, Judge W Morgan2, Ronald E Shaffer1.   

Abstract

Speech Intelligibility (SI) is the perceived quality of sound transmission. In healthcare settings, the ability to communicate clearly with coworkers, patients, etc., is crucial to quality patient care and safety. The objectives of this study were to: (1) assess the suitability of the Speech Transmission Index (STI) methods for testing reusable and disposable facial and respiratory personal protective equipment (protective facemasks [PF], N95 filtering facepiece respirators [N95 FFR], and elastomeric half-mask air-purifying respirators [EAPR]) commonly worn by healthcare workers; (2) quantify STI levels of these devices; and (3) contribute to the scientific body of knowledge in the area of SI. SI was assessed using the STI under two experimental conditions: (1) a modified version of the National Fire Protection Association 1981 Supplementary Voice Communications System Performance Test at a Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) of -15 (66 dBA) and (2) STI measurements utilizing a range of modified pink noise levels (52.5 dBA (-2 SNR) - 72.5 dBA (+7 SNR)) in 5.0 dBA increments. The PF models (Kimberly Clark 49214 and 3 M 1818) had the least effect on SI interference, typically deviating from the STI baseline (no-mask condition) by 3% and 4% STI, respectively. The N95FFR (3 M 1870, 3 M 1860) had more effect on SI interference, typically differing from baseline by 13% and 17%, respectively, for models tested. The EAPR models (Scott Xcel and North 5500) had the most significant impact on SI, differing from baseline by 42% for models tested. This data offers insight into the performance of these apparatus with respect to STI and may serve as a reference point for future respirator design considerations, standards development, testing and certification activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; facemask; healthcare; respiratory protection; speech intelligibility

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27362358      PMCID: PMC5065390          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1200723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  16 in total

1.  Physiological impact of the N95 filtering facepiece respirator on healthcare workers.

Authors:  Raymond J Roberge; Aitor Coca; W Jon Williams; Jeffrey B Powell; Andrew J Palmiero
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  Acoustics and psychosocial environment in intensive coronary care.

Authors:  V Blomkvist; C A Eriksen; T Theorell; R Ulrich; G Rasmanis
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Ergonomics assessment of selected dust respirators: Their use in the tropics.

Authors:  J D Abeysekera; H Shahnavaz
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Respirator tolerance in health care workers.

Authors:  Lewis J Radonovich; Jing Cheng; Brian V Shenal; Michael Hodgson; Bradley S Bender
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Diminished speech intelligibility associated with certain types of respirators worn by healthcare workers.

Authors:  Lewis J Radonovich; Robert Yanke; Jing Cheng; Bradley Bender
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Study of respirator effect on nasal-oral flow partition.

Authors:  P Harber; J Beck; J Luo
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Environmental noise as a cause of sleep disruption in an intermediate respiratory care unit.

Authors:  J N Aaron; C C Carlisle; M A Carskadon; T J Meyer; N S Hill; R P Millman
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Ambient sound levels in a state psychiatric hospital.

Authors:  S K Holmberg; S Coon
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.218

9.  Sleep in the pediatric ICU: an empirical investigation.

Authors:  R A Cureton-Lane; D K Fontaine
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution.

Authors:  Leslie A Nickell; Eric J Crighton; C Shawn Tracy; Hadi Al-Enazy; Yemisi Bolaji; Sagina Hanjrah; Ayesha Hussain; Samia Makhlouf; Ross E G Upshur
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Is a Mask That Covers the Mouth and Nose Free from Undesirable Side Effects in Everyday Use and Free of Potential Hazards?

Authors:  Kai Kisielinski; Paul Giboni; Andreas Prescher; Bernd Klosterhalfen; David Graessel; Stefan Funken; Oliver Kempski; Oliver Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Listening in 2020: A Survey of Adults' Experiences With Pandemic-Related Disruptions.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sara K Mamo; Michael Clauss; Silvana Tellerico
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  The impact of face masks on spectral acoustics of speech: Effect of clear and loud speech styles.

Authors:  Thea Knowles; Gursharan Badh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Modeling the influence of COVID-19 protective measures on the mechanics of phonation.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deng; Mohamed A Serry; Matías Zañartu; Byron D Erath; Sean D Peterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Effect of face masks on speech understanding: A clinical perspective during speech audiometry.

Authors:  Rawish Kumar; Sanjay Kumar Munjal; Anuradha Sharma; Md Noorain Alam; Naresh K Panda
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2022-04-29

6.  Developing Educational Health Modules to Improve Vocal Wellness in Mask-Wearing Occupational Voice Users.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Renee L Gustin; Rebecca J Howell; Tulsi H Patel; Mariah B Emery; Courtney L Kendall; Nicholas J Kelliher
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask.

Authors:  Duy Duong Nguyen; Patricia McCabe; Donna Thomas; Alison Purcell; Maree Doble; Daniel Novakovic; Antonia Chacon; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of Wearing Face Masks While Using Different Speaking Styles in Noise on Speech Intelligibility During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Hoyoung Yi; Ashly Pingsterhaus; Woonyoung Song
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-28

9.  Influence of surgical and N95 face masks on speech perception and listening effort in noise.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Laura Fröhlich; Stefan Plontke; Luise Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cuts ties with patients' outside world.

Authors:  Amy Freeman-Sanderson; Louise Rose; Martin B Brodsky
Journal:  Aust Crit Care       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.265

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.