| Literature DB >> 33261137 |
Kasandra Ascuña-Durand1, Renzo S Salazar-Sánchez1,2, Ricardo Castillo-Neyra2,3, Jorge Ballón-Echegaray2,4.
Abstract
Blastocystis is one of the most common protozoa found in the human gut and are genetically diverse and widely distributed around the world. Nonspecific and inconsistent symptoms have been associated with this protozoon; thus, its clinical importance remains controversial. Our aim was to estimate the relative frequency of Blastocystis subtypes 1, 2, and 3, which are the predominant subtypes reported in South America, based on conserved regions of SSU rDNA sequences and determine the factors associated with them. A total of 116 Blastocystis-positive stool samples were processed using conventional PCR with Blastocystis-specific primers. We identified subtype 1 (10.3%), subtype 2 (7.8%), subtype 3 (25.0%), and mixed subtype infections (8.7%). However, we could not identify any Blastocystis subtypes in 48.3% of the samples; therefore, it is likely that other subtypes were present in the area. No association was found between any gastrointestinal symptom and single or mixed Blastocystis subtypes. We found a statistically significant association between Blastocystis subtype 2 and irritable bowel syndrome (OR = 17.8, 95% CI = 1.5-408.4, p = 0.039); however, the number of samples with IBS was small (n= 4). There was no association between the Blastocystis subtypes and any epidemiological variable studied. In rural populations, we only identified subtype 1, while in urban and periurban populations, we identified subtypes 1, 2, and 3.Entities:
Keywords: Blastocystis; controversial; epidemiological variables; protozoon; symptoms
Year: 2020 PMID: 33261137 PMCID: PMC7709661 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed5040178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Infect Dis ISSN: 2414-6366
Figure 1Spatial distribution of the Blastocystis subtypes. All urban, periurban, and rural districts in Arequipa city are shown.
Frequency and prevalence of Blastocystis subtypes 1, 2, and 3 (ST1, ST2, and ST3) and the type of infection identified in the tested samples.
| Type of | Prevalence | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple infection | ST1 (12) | 10.3 | 4.3–16.3 |
| ST2 (9) | 7.8 | 2.8–12.8 | |
| ST3 (29) | 25 | 17.0–33.0 | |
| Unknown (56) | 48.3 | 39.3–57.3 | |
| Mixed infection | ST1,3 (9) | 7.8 | 2.8–12.8 |
| ST1,2,3 (1) | 0.8 | 0–2.9 |
Figure 2Blastocystis subtype distribution in each study area. STx corresponds to an unknown Blastocystis subtype and STmix corresponds to mixed subtypes.
Figure 3Distribution and composition of Blastocystis subtypes per household and study area. * STx: unknown Blastocystis subtype. n corresponds to the number of households that participated in each study area and not the number of participants. The samples came from 116 people from 78 households within 3 areas.
Figure 4Symptomatology percentage by Blastocystis subtypes 1, 2, 3, and mixed infection.
Relationship between Blastocystis subtypes and sanitary living conditions.
| Variable | ST1 | ST2 | ST3 | Mixed Infection | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 16 (76%) | 5 (50%) | 21 (54%) | 7 (70.0%) | 0.304 † |
| Age | |||||
| Mean (SD) | 32.5 (23%) | 40.1 (23%) | 37.3 (23%) | 31 (26%) | 0.995 & |
| Median (IQR) | 33 (11–49%) | 46 (18–57%) | 33 (14–54%) | 16 (10–50%) | |
| Areas | |||||
| Urban | 6 (29%) | 7 (70%) | 16 (41%) | 5 (50%) | 0.178 † |
| Periurban | 15 (71%) | 3 (30%) | 23 (59%) | 5 (50%) | |
| Water supply | |||||
| Tap water | 20 (95%) | 10 (100%) | 36 (92%) | 10 (100%) | 1 † |
| Not tap water | 1 (5%) | 3 (8%) | |||
| Final feces disposal | |||||
| Piped sewer system | 20 (95%) | 10 (100%) | 35 (90%) | 10 (100%) | 0.761 † |
| Latrine | 1 (6%) | 4 (10%) | |||
| Presence of animals | 15 (71%) | 9 (90%) | 32 (82%) | 7 (70%) | 0.554 † |
| Presence of dogs | 12 (57%) | 8 (80%) | 26 (67%) | 6 (60%) | 0.631 † |
| Presence of cats | 5 (24%) | 2 (20%) | 12 (31%) | 2 (20%) | 0.874 † |
| Presence of guinea pigs | 3 (14%) | 1 (10%) | 10 (26%) | 2 (20%) | 0.725 † |
| Presence of rabbits | 5 (24%) | 2 (20%) | 9 (23%) | 2 (20%) | 1 † |
| Presence of poultry | 5 (24%) | 2 (20%) | 14 (36%) | 2 (20%) | 0.672 † |
| Presence of flies | 15 (71%) | 6 (60%) | 29 (74%) | 7 (70%) | 0.831 † |
| Presence of cockroaches | 5 (24%) | 1 (10%) | 9 (23%) | 2 (20%) | 0.911 † |
| Presence of rodents | 3 (14%) | 2 (20%) | 7 (18%) | 1 (10%) | 1 † |
| Place of food consumption | |||||
| House | 17 (81%) | 7 (70%) | 32 (82%) | 8 (80%) | 0.377 † |
| Restaurant | 2 (10%) | 1 (10%) | 1 (3%) | 1 (10%) | |
| House and restaurant | 2 (20%) | 4 (10%) | |||
| House and food cart | 2 (10%) | 2 (5%) | 1 (10%) | ||
| Kind of water consumption | |||||
| Boiled water | 18 (86%) | 8 (80%) | 32 (82%) | 9 (90%) | 0.737 † |
| Tap water | 1 (5%) | ||||
| Both | 2 (10%) | 2 (20%) | 7 (18%) | 1 (10%) | |
| Fresh vegetables consumption | 8 (38%) | 5 (50%) | 14 (36%) | 4 (40%) | 0.904 † |
| Fresh fruits consumption | 10 (48%) | 5 (50%) | 16 (41%) | 6 (60%) | 0.755 † |
† Fisher’s exact test. & Kruskal–Wallis test.