| Literature DB >> 17073082 |
Michael Zachary Levy1, Natalie M Bowman, Vivian Kawai, Lance A Waller, Juan Geny Cornejo del Carpio, Eleazar Cordova Benzaquen, Robert H Gilman, Caryn Bern.
Abstract
In Arequipa, Peru, vectorborne transmission of Chagas disease by Triatoma infestans has become an urban problem. We conducted an entomologic survey in a periurban community of Arequipa to identify risk factors for triatomine infestation and determinants of vector population densities. Of 374 households surveyed, triatomines were collected from 194 (52%), and Trypanosoma cruzi-carrying triatomines were collected from 72 (19.3%). Guinea pig pens were more likely than other animal enclosures to be infested and harbored 2.38x as many triatomines. Stacked brick and adobe enclosures were more likely to have triatomines, while wire mesh enclosures were protected against infestation. In human dwellings, only fully stuccoed rooms were protected against infestation. Spatially, households with triatomines were scattered, while households with T. cruzi-infected triatomines were clustered. Keeping small animals in wire mesh cages could facilitate control of T. infestans in this densely populated urban environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17073082 PMCID: PMC3294737 DOI: 10.3201/eid1209.051662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1High density of homes in the periurban community of Guadalupe, Arequipa, Peru, November 2004.
Figure 2Map of households with Triatoma infestans and Trypanosmona cruzi–infected T. infestans in Guadalupe, a periurban community of Arequipa, Peru. Concentric circles are drawn around a house near the center of Guadalupe and represent parameters of T. infestans dispersal observed in rural areas (,). The nearest houses of neighboring communities are included for reference.
Risk factors for Triatoma infestans in animal enclosures in a periurban community of Arequipa, Peru*
| Risk factor | % of enclosures (n = 803) | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis† | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p value | |||
| Animal host | ||||||
| Guinea pig | 24 | 1.54 (0.95–2.4) | 0.057 | 1.69 (1.05–2.74) | 0.031 | |
| Rabbit | 23 | 1.48 (0.91–2.4) | 0.088 | 1.52 (0.93–2.49) | 0.099 | |
| Chicken | 18 | 0.28 (0.12–0.62) | 0.001 | 0.36 (0.16-0.80) | 0.012 | |
| No. animals (mean)‡ | 5.5 | 0.29§ | ||||
| Material | ||||||
| Wire mesh only | 17 | 0.17 (0.04–0.46) | 0.008 | 0.18 (0.06–0.53) | 0.002 | |
| Unmortared brick | 19 | 2.96 (1.84–4.70) | 0.0001 | 2.02 (1.23–3.29) | 0.005 | |
| Adobe | 5 | 2.73 (1.19–5.88) | 0.005 | 2.52 (1.18–5.39) | 0.017 | |
| Mortared brick, | 12 | 0.50 (0.19–1.11) | 0.08 | 0.50 (0.21–1.17) | 0.11 | |
| Unmortared | 30 | 1.69 (1.08–2.62) | 0.14 | |||
| Stucco¶ | 4 | 0.00 (0.00–0.70) | 0.02 | |||
| Insecticide use‡ | 15 | 1.09 (0.59–1.85) | 0.77 | |||
*OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. †Models were fit with generalized estimating equations appropriate for repeated measures in households. ‡Dropped from multivariate model. §Kruskal-Wallis trend test for continuous variables. ¶Fully stuccoed enclosures were omitted from the multivariate model because none were positive for T. infestans.
Determinants of population density of Triatoma infestans in animal enclosures in infested households of a periurban community of Arequipa, Peru*
| Risk factor | Mean no. triatomines captured (range) | Univariate zero-truncated negative binomial regression | Multivariate zero-truncated negative binomial regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio (95% CI) | p value | Adjusted ratio (95% CI) | p value | |||
| Animal host | ||||||
| Guinea pigs | 33.9 (1–343) | 2.25 (0.9–5.8) | 0.09 | 2.38 (1.0–5.7) | 0.05 | |
| No animals present | 2.6 (1–7) | 0.08 (0.02–0.32) | <0.01 | 0.15 (0.04–0.57) | <0.01 | |
| Chickens† | 28.2 (1–79) | 1.38 (0.23–8.4) | 0.70 | |||
| Turkeys†‡ | 6.0 (1–15) | 0.18 (0.02–1.5) | 0.11 | |||
| No. animals†§ | 1.0 (0.92–1.22) | 0.65 | ||||
| Material | ||||||
| Wire mesh only | 6.7 (1–10) | 0.21 (0.02–1.75) | 0.15 | 0.09 (0.01–0.6) | 0.02 | |
| Unmortared basalt | 11.8 (1–109) | 0.38 (0.15–0.96) | 0.04 | 0.35 (0.15–0.80) | 0.01 | |
| Mortared brick, basalt, and | 6.5 (3–15) | 0.20 (0.03–1.3) | 0.09 | 0.21 (0.04–1.1) | 0.06 | |
| Unmortared brick† | 23.3 (1–90) | 1.13 (0.46–2.8) | 0.80 | |||
| Adobe† | 21.0 (1–112) | 0.94 (0.22–4.0) | 0.94 | |||
| Insecticide use† | 29.8 (1–112) | 1.1 (0.45–2.7) | 0.80 | |||
*Triatomine density was estimated by timed capture of insects by trained collectors. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. †Dropped from the multivariate model. ‡1 turkey enclosure, which contained 598 T. infestans, was considered an outlier and left out of analysis. §No mean is given for continuous variables.
Risk factors for Triatoma infestans in rooms of human dwellings in a periurban community of Arequipa, Peru*
| Risk factor | % of rooms (N = 1,424) | Univariate analysis† | Multivariate logistic regression† | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p value | |||
| Host | ||||||
| No. persons sleeping in room | <0.001‡ | 1.63 (1.48–1.79) | <0.001 | |||
| Animal sleeping in room | 5.1 | 2.79 | <0.001 | 1.90 (1.10–3.28) | 0.021 | |
| Peridomestic infestation | ||||||
| Guinea pig enclosure | 9.1 | 1.70 (1.07–2.63) | 0.014 | 2.23 (1.30–3.82) | 0.004 | |
| Yard | 11.7 | 1.41 (0.92–2.12) | 0.09 | 2.10 (1.27–3.46) | 0.004 | |
| Sheep enclosure§ | 5.3 | 2.29 (1.31–3.90) | 0.001 | |||
| Material | ||||||
| Mortared brick | 19.0 | 2.39 (1.73–3.30) | <0.001 | 1.76 (1.15–2.71) | 0.01 | |
| Mortared | 20.2 | 2.00 (1.44–2.76) | <0.001 | 1.60 (1.04–2.47) | 0.033 | |
| Fully stuccoed | 41.7 | 0.25 (0.17–0.38) | <0.001 | 0.27 (0.17–0.44) | <0.001 | |
| Unmortared | 26.5 | 1.21 (0.81–1.78) | 0.32 | |||
| Insecticide use§ | 43.8 | 0.91 (0.68–1.22) | 0.53 | |||
*OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. †Models were fit with generalized estimating equations appropriate for repeated measures in households. ‡Kruskal-Wallis trend test for continuous variable. §Dropped from the multivariate model.
Determinants of population density of Triatoma infestans in rooms of human dwellings in a periurban community of Arequipa, Peru*
| Risk factor | Mean no. triatomines captured (range) | Univariate zero-truncated negative binomial regression | Multivariate zero-truncated negative binomial regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio (95% CI) | p value | Adjusted ratio (95% CI) | p value | |||
| Host | ||||||
| Each person sleeping in room† | 1.58 (1.29–1.93) | <0.001 | 1.42 (1.16–1.72) | 0.001 | ||
| Animal sleeping in room | 22.12 (1–124) | 7.34 (2.20–24.54) | 0.001 | 5.23 (1.56–17.47) | 0.007 | |
| Material | ||||||
| Fully stuccoed walls and ceiling | 3.03 (1–20) | 0.065 (0.03–0.16) | <0.001 | 0.11 (0.04–0.31) | <0.001 | |
| Adobe | 1.73 (1–4) | 0.055 (0.013–0.24) | <0.001 | 0.15 (0.032–0.73) | 0.019 | |
| Mortared brick, | 12.62 (1–124) | 2.25 (1.08–4.71) | 0.03 | 0.80 (0.35–1.84) | 0.599‡ | |
| Unmortared brick, | 11.85 (1–103) | 1.58 (0.65–3.87) | 0.313 | |||
| Insecticide use§ | 9.74 (1–124) | 1.20 (0.32–2.44) | 0.808 | |||
*Triatomine density was estimated by timed-capture of insects by trained collectors. CI, confidence interval. †No mean is given for continuous variables. ‡The variable describing mortared brick, sillar, and basalt was left in the final model because it represents a possible intervention and was therefore a principal variable of interest. Removing the variable does not greatly affect the estimates for the other parameters or the significance level of those estimates. §Dropped from the multivariate model.
Figure 3Clustering analysis of A) houses with Triatoma infestans and B) houses with Trypanosoma cruzi–infected T. infestans in a periurban community of Arequipa, Peru.