| Literature DB >> 30171064 |
Raul Y Tito1,2,3, Samuel Chaffron4, Clara Caenepeel5, Gipsi Lima-Mendez1,2, Jun Wang1,2, Sara Vieira-Silva1,2, Gwen Falony1,2, Falk Hildebrand6, Youssef Darzi1,2, Leen Rymenans1,2, Chloë Verspecht1,2, Peer Bork6,7,8, Severine Vermeire5, Marie Joossens1,2, Jeroen Raes1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Human gut microbiome studies are mainly bacteria- and archaea-oriented, overlooking the presence of single-cell eukaryotes such as Blastocystis, an enteric stramenopiles with worldwide distribution. Here, we surveyed the prevalence and subtype variation of Blastocystis in faecal samples collected as part of the Flemish Gut Flora Project (FGFP), a Western population cohort. We assessed potential links between Blastocystis subtypes and identified microbiota-host covariates and quantified microbiota differentiation relative to subtype abundances.Entities:
Keywords: Blastocystis; FGFP; Microbiota
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30171064 PMCID: PMC6582744 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut ISSN: 0017-5749 Impact factor: 23.059
Figure 1Prevalence, distribution and cell density of Blastocystis subtypes. (A) Prevalence of Blastocystis subtypes in the Flemish Gut Flora Project (FGFP) and IBD-L cohorts. IBD-affected individuals present lower prevalence of Blastocystis. (B) Prevalence of Blastocystis subtypes in the FGFP, TwinsUK (n=1045) and American gut project (AGP) (n=7567). (C) Neighbour-joining 18S rRNA gene phylogenetic tree of FGFP Blastocystis subtypes based on an alignment of 181 bases fragments from the most abundant sequence of each subtype29 and boxplot of their relative abundances in Blastocystis-positive individuals. Two extreme outliers were omitted from the visualisation. (D) Boxplot of Blastocystis cells per milligram of stool in the four more prevalent ST in the FGFP. The body of the boxplots represents the first and third quartiles of the distribution, and the median line. The whiskers extend from the quartiles to the last data point within 1.5×IQR, with outliers beyond. Dunn’s multiple-comparison test, false discovery rate (FDR): *FDR<0.01 and .FDR<0.05.
Descriptive statistics of Flemish Gut Flora Project individuals grouped by Blastocystis carrier status and subtype
| Carriers | ST1 | ST2 | ST3 | ST4 | Others | |
| (n=430) | (n=23) | (n=26) | (n=52) | (n=67) | (n=18) | |
| Gender (F/M) | 237/193 | 13/10 | 16/10 | 25/27 | 41/26 | 14/4 |
| Age (mean, SD) | 49.5, 14.5 | 50.3, 15.6 | 51.4, 11.3 | 53.6, 13.4 | 57.5, 10.6 | 54.7, 7.8 |
| BMI (mean, SD) | 24.7, 4.5 | 24.7, 5.0 | 22.9, 2.5 | 24.4, 3.5 | 24.0, 3.2 | 25.7, 4.3 |
| BSS (mean, SD) | 3.97, 1.19 | 3.43, 1.12 | 4.00, 1.17 | 3.83, 1.23 | 4.07, 1.05 | |
| IBS (yes/no) | 101/329 | 3/20 | 7/19 | 12/40 | 14/53 | 1/17 |
Parameters reported include: gender, age, BMI, stool consistency measured on the BSS and IBS diagnosis reported by participants’ general practitioner.
BMI, body mass index; BSS, Bristol stool scale; F, female; M, male.
Figure 2Microbial community variation associated to enterotypes and Blastocystis subtypes in the Flemish Gut Flora Project (FGFP) cohort. (A) Blastocystis carrier and non-carrier individuals (top panel) and subtype carriers (bottom panel) position in microbiota community space, represented by principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of genus-level Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of the bacterial and archaeal fraction. The percentage of variation explained by the two first PCoA dimensions is reported on the axes. (B) Observed genus richness and Shannon diversity index (SDI) across Blastocystis non-carriers and carriers grouped by subtype. Presence of Blastocystis is associated to higher richness and SDI. Subtypes ST2 and ST4 have higher SDI compared with ST3. Wilcoxon test false discovery rate (FDR): *FDR<0.01; .FDR<0.05. (C) Distribution of Blastocystis non-carrier and subtypes carriers with respect to enterotypes, using Dirichlet Multinomial Mixtures community typing (Falony et al 2016). The Ruminococcaceae and Prevotella enterotypes have a higher proportion of Blastocystis carriers than Bacteroides1 and especially Bacteroides2. The body of the box plot represents the first and third quartiles of the distribution, and the median line. The whiskers extend from the quartiles to the last data point within 1.5×IQR, with outliers beyond.
Figure 3Blastocystis subtype carriers are strongly linked to microbial community composition. (A) Correlation between bacteria and archaea genera and Blastocystis subtypes. Heatmap of correlations between bacteria and archaea genera and Blastocystis subtypes is indicated by colours, positive (red) and negative (blue). The significant correlations (false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05) are indicated by ‘+’; only bacteria and archaea genera and Blastocystis subtypes with at least one significant correlation are shown. (B, C) The four genera with significant differences in relative abundances between the most prevalent Blastocystis subtypes carriers. (B) Akkermansia-relative abundances correlate negatively with abundances of Blastocystis ST3 and positively with ST4. (C) Differences in relative abundances of Anaerotruncus, Coprobacter and Enterococcus between the most prevalent Blastocystis subtypes carriers. Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Wilcoxon test with multiple testing correction (FDR). *FDR<0.05 and Spearman correlation, FDR<0.05. The body of the boxplots represents the first and third quartiles of the distribution, and the median line. The whiskers extend from the quartiles to the last data point within 1.5×IQR, with outliers beyond.
Figure 4Explanatory power of Blastocystis carrier status and its total or subtypes relative abundances on microbiota community variation (bacterial and archaeal fraction), compared with the microbiota covariates reported in Falony et al.17 Variables are ordered according to the cumulative effect size of non-redundant covariates selected by stepwise redundancy analysis analysis (right bars) compared with individual effect sizes assuming independence (left bars) (false discovery rate<0.1). Variables labelled in grey did not contribute to additional explanatory power in the cumulative model. The full list is available in online supplementary table S11. Individuals carrying both Blastocystis and other single-cell eukaryotes were excluded from the analysis. HDL, high-density lipoprotein; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.