Literature DB >> 33259388

Fifteen years of IOL exchange: indications, outcomes, and complications.

Jordy Goemaere1, Céline Trigaux, Laurens Denissen, Diana Dragnea, Minh-Tri Hua, Marie-José Tassignon, Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the indications, frequency, and outcomes regarding intraocular lens (IOL) exchange in 2 university hospital tertiary referral settings over a period of 15 years.
SETTING: Ophthalmology departments of the University Hospital Antwerp and the University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, included were patients who underwent an IOL exchange between 2002 and 2017. Patient demographics, surgical indication, comorbidities, visual outcomes, and complications were reported. Patients who underwent IOL repositioning or add-on IOL implantation or extraction, and patients who were left aphakic, were excluded.
RESULTS: Included in the study were 492 eyes. The mean age was 66.0 ± 13.3 years (range 19-91 years). The mean time between primary surgery and IOL exchange was 54.61 ± 67.07 months (range 0-343 months). Primary indication for explantation was IOL opacification, and the most common ophthalmic comorbidity was a previous history of vitreoretinal surgery. Preoperatively, the mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were 0.47 ± 0.27 (range 0-1) and 0.61 ± 0.32 (range 0-1.2), respectively. Postoperative UCVA and CDVA was 0.7 ± 0.3 (range 0-1.2) and 0.8 ± 0.28 (range 0.05-1.6), respectively. The increase in both CDVA and UCVA was statistically significant (P < .001, paired t test). The most common complication perioperatively was vitreous prolapse, which occurred in 61 eyes (16%).
CONCLUSIONS: IOL exchange is a challenging yet valuable treatment option for a wide spectrum of problematic IOL outcomes. The most common indication remains IOL opacification, although IOL dislocation and patient dissatisfaction are increasing as indications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33259388     DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Nallasamy formula: a stacking ensemble machine learning method for refraction prediction in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Tingyang Li; Joshua Stein; Nambi Nallasamy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.908

2.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes Following Exchange of an Opacified Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Stephen A Stewart; Richard N McNeely; Wing C Chan; Jonathan E Moore
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Patients' dissatisfaction with multifocal intraocular lenses managed by exchange with other multifocal lenses of different optical profiles.

Authors:  Olena Al-Shymali; Colm McAlinden; Jorge L Alio Del Barrio; Mario Canto-Cerdan; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-01

4.  Intraocular Acrylic Allergy: Is it Something to Sneeze at?

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Nour Bundogji; Alyson N Tukan; Rachel Huynh
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-07-14

5.  Optical Bench Analysis of 2 Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Andreas F Borkenstein; Eva-Maria Borkenstein; Holger Luedtke; Ruediger Schmid
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2021-09-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.