Literature DB >> 33257553

Fluctuating optimum and temporally variable selection on breeding date in birds and mammals.

Pierre de Villemereuil1,2, Anne Charmantier3, Debora Arlt4, Pierre Bize5, Patricia Brekke6, Lyanne Brouwer7,8,9, Andrew Cockburn7, Steeve D Côté10, F Stephen Dobson11, Simon R Evans12,13, Marco Festa-Bianchet14,7, Marlène Gamelon15, Sandra Hamel16, Johann Hegelbach17, Kurt Jerstad18, Bart Kempenaers19, Loeske E B Kruuk7, Jouko Kumpula20, Thomas Kvalnes15, Andrew G McAdam21, S Eryn McFarlane22,23, Michael B Morrissey24, Tomas Pärt4, Josephine M Pemberton23, Anna Qvarnström22, Ole Wiggo Røstad25, Julia Schroeder26, Juan Carlos Senar27, Ben C Sheldon12, Martijn van de Pol8, Marcel E Visser8, Nathaniel T Wheelwright28, Jarle Tufto29, Luis-Miguel Chevin1.   

Abstract

Temporal variation in natural selection is predicted to strongly impact the evolution and demography of natural populations, with consequences for the rate of adaptation, evolution of plasticity, and extinction risk. Most of the theory underlying these predictions assumes a moving optimum phenotype, with predictions expressed in terms of the temporal variance and autocorrelation of this optimum. However, empirical studies seldom estimate patterns of fluctuations of an optimum phenotype, precluding further progress in connecting theory with observations. To bridge this gap, we assess the evidence for temporal variation in selection on breeding date by modeling a fitness function with a fluctuating optimum, across 39 populations of 21 wild animals, one of the largest compilations of long-term datasets with individual measurements of trait and fitness components. We find compelling evidence for fluctuations in the fitness function, causing temporal variation in the magnitude, but not the direction of selection. However, fluctuations of the optimum phenotype need not directly translate into variation in selection gradients, because their impact can be buffered by partial tracking of the optimum by the mean phenotype. Analyzing individuals that reproduce in consecutive years, we find that plastic changes track movements of the optimum phenotype across years, especially in bird species, reducing temporal variation in directional selection. This suggests that phenological plasticity has evolved to cope with fluctuations in the optimum, despite their currently modest contribution to variation in selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; fitness landscape; fluctuating environment; meta-analysis; phenotypic plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33257553      PMCID: PMC7116484          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2009003117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  60 in total

1.  Evolution of genetic variability and the advantage of sex and recombination in changing environments.

Authors:  R Bürger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimating the variation, autocorrelation, and environmental sensitivity of phenotypic selection.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Marcel E Visser; Jarle Tufto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Delayed phenology and reduced fitness associated with climate change in a wild hibernator.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Lane; Loeske E B Kruuk; Anne Charmantier; Jan O Murie; F Stephen Dobson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. II. Centripetal selection, mutation, and isoallelic variation.

Authors:  B D Latter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  The theoretical population genetics of variable selection and migration.

Authors:  J Felsenstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Why breeding time has not responded to selection for earlier breeding in a songbird population.

Authors:  Phillip Gienapp; Erik Postma; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Anne Charmantier; Robin H McCleery; Lionel R Cole; Chris Perrins; Loeske E B Kruuk; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Fluctuating optimum and temporally variable selection on breeding date in birds and mammals.

Authors:  Pierre de Villemereuil; Anne Charmantier; Debora Arlt; Pierre Bize; Patricia Brekke; Lyanne Brouwer; Andrew Cockburn; Steeve D Côté; F Stephen Dobson; Simon R Evans; Marco Festa-Bianchet; Marlène Gamelon; Sandra Hamel; Johann Hegelbach; Kurt Jerstad; Bart Kempenaers; Loeske E B Kruuk; Jouko Kumpula; Thomas Kvalnes; Andrew G McAdam; S Eryn McFarlane; Michael B Morrissey; Tomas Pärt; Josephine M Pemberton; Anna Qvarnström; Ole Wiggo Røstad; Julia Schroeder; Juan Carlos Senar; Ben C Sheldon; Martijn van de Pol; Marcel E Visser; Nathaniel T Wheelwright; Jarle Tufto; Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient.

Authors:  Viktoriia Radchuk; Thomas Reed; Céline Teplitsky; Martijn van de Pol; Anne Charmantier; Christopher Hassall; Peter Adamík; Frank Adriaensen; Markus P Ahola; Peter Arcese; Jesús Miguel Avilés; Javier Balbontin; Karl S Berg; Antoni Borras; Sarah Burthe; Jean Clobert; Nina Dehnhard; Florentino de Lope; André A Dhondt; Niels J Dingemanse; Hideyuki Doi; Tapio Eeva; Joerns Fickel; Iolanda Filella; Frode Fossøy; Anne E Goodenough; Stephen J G Hall; Bengt Hansson; Michael Harris; Dennis Hasselquist; Thomas Hickler; Jasmin Joshi; Heather Kharouba; Juan Gabriel Martínez; Jean-Baptiste Mihoub; James A Mills; Mercedes Molina-Morales; Arne Moksnes; Arpat Ozgul; Deseada Parejo; Philippe Pilard; Maud Poisbleau; Francois Rousset; Mark-Oliver Rödel; David Scott; Juan Carlos Senar; Constanti Stefanescu; Bård G Stokke; Tamotsu Kusano; Maja Tarka; Corey E Tarwater; Kirsten Thonicke; Jack Thorley; Andreas Wilting; Piotr Tryjanowski; Juha Merilä; Ben C Sheldon; Anders Pape Møller; Erik Matthysen; Fredric Janzen; F Stephen Dobson; Marcel E Visser; Steven R Beissinger; Alexandre Courtiol; Stephanie Kramer-Schadt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Exploring the genetics of nestling personality traits in a wild passerine bird: testing the phenotypic gambit.

Authors:  Jon E Brommer; Edward Kluen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  10 in total

1.  Increasing temporal variance leads to stable species range limits.

Authors:  John W Benning; Ruth A Hufbauer; Christopher Weiss-Lehman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Birth timing generates reproductive trade-offs in a non-seasonal breeding primate.

Authors:  Jules Dezeure; Alice Baniel; Alecia Carter; Guy Cowlishaw; Bernard Godelle; Elise Huchard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fluctuating optimum and temporally variable selection on breeding date in birds and mammals.

Authors:  Pierre de Villemereuil; Anne Charmantier; Debora Arlt; Pierre Bize; Patricia Brekke; Lyanne Brouwer; Andrew Cockburn; Steeve D Côté; F Stephen Dobson; Simon R Evans; Marco Festa-Bianchet; Marlène Gamelon; Sandra Hamel; Johann Hegelbach; Kurt Jerstad; Bart Kempenaers; Loeske E B Kruuk; Jouko Kumpula; Thomas Kvalnes; Andrew G McAdam; S Eryn McFarlane; Michael B Morrissey; Tomas Pärt; Josephine M Pemberton; Anna Qvarnström; Ole Wiggo Røstad; Julia Schroeder; Juan Carlos Senar; Ben C Sheldon; Martijn van de Pol; Marcel E Visser; Nathaniel T Wheelwright; Jarle Tufto; Luis-Miguel Chevin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Episodes of opposing survival and reproductive selection cause strong fluctuating selection on seasonal migration versus residence.

Authors:  Paul Acker; Sarah J Burthe; Mark A Newell; Hannah Grist; Carrie Gunn; Michael P Harris; Ana Payo-Payo; Robert Swann; Sarah Wanless; Francis Daunt; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Frequency dependence and the predictability of evolution in a changing environment.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Zachariah Gompert; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2021-12-20

6.  Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds, revisited: Hard selection and the evolution of plasticity.

Authors:  Jarrod D Hadfield; Thomas E Reed
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2022-02-28

7.  Population differentiation of polygenic score predictions under stabilizing selection.

Authors:  Sivan Yair; Graham Coop
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.671

8.  Conceptualizing the evolutionary quantitative genetics of phenological life-history events: Breeding time as a plastic threshold trait.

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Paul Acker
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2022-04-05

9.  The relevance of pedigrees in the conservation genomics era.

Authors:  Stephanie J Galla; Liz Brown; Yvette Couch-Lewis Ngāi Tahu Te Hapū O Ngāti Wheke Ngāti Waewae; Ilina Cubrinovska; Daryl Eason; Rebecca M Gooley; Jill A Hamilton; Julie A Heath; Samantha S Hauser; Emily K Latch; Marjorie D Matocq; Anne Richardson; Jana R Wold; Carolyn J Hogg; Anna W Santure; Tammy E Steeves
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 6.622

10.  Ecological causes of fluctuating natural selection on habitat choice in an amphibian.

Authors:  Josh Van Buskirk; David C Smith
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.694

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.