Literature DB >> 34004132

Episodes of opposing survival and reproductive selection cause strong fluctuating selection on seasonal migration versus residence.

Paul Acker1,2, Sarah J Burthe3, Mark A Newell3, Hannah Grist4, Carrie Gunn3, Michael P Harris3, Ana Payo-Payo1, Robert Swann5, Sarah Wanless3, Francis Daunt3, Jane M Reid1,2.   

Abstract

Quantifying temporal variation in sex-specific selection on key ecologically relevant traits, and quantifying how such variation arises through synergistic or opposing components of survival and reproductive selection, is central to understanding eco-evolutionary dynamics, but rarely achieved. Seasonal migration versus residence is one key trait that directly shapes spatio-seasonal population dynamics in spatially and temporally varying environments, but temporal dynamics of sex-specific selection have not been fully quantified. We fitted multi-event capture-recapture models to year-round ring resightings and breeding success data from partially migratory European shags (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) to quantify temporal variation in annual sex-specific selection on seasonal migration versus residence arising through adult survival, reproduction and the combination of both (i.e. annual fitness). We demonstrate episodes of strong and strongly fluctuating selection through annual fitness that were broadly synchronized across females and males. These overall fluctuations arose because strong reproductive selection against migration in several years contrasted with strong survival selection against residence in years with extreme climatic events. These results indicate how substantial phenotypic and genetic variation in migration versus residence could be maintained, and highlight that biologically important fluctuations in selection may not be detected unless both survival selection and reproductive selection are appropriately quantified and combined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  annual fitness; extreme climatic event; fecundity selection; multi-event capture–recapture; partial migration; sex-specific selection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34004132      PMCID: PMC8131125          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  34 in total

1.  Estimating selection on neonatal traits in red deer using elasticity path analysis.

Authors:  T Coulson; L E B Kruuk; G Tavecchia; J M Pemberton; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Evolution and stability of the G-matrix on a landscape with a moving optimum.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Estimating the variation, autocorrelation, and environmental sensitivity of phenotypic selection.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Marcel E Visser; Jarle Tufto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong?

Authors:  Joe Hereford; Thomas F Hansen; David Houle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Joseph D DiBattista; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 6.  Partial migration in fishes: definitions, methodologies and taxonomic distribution.

Authors:  B B Chapman; C Skov; K Hulthén; J Brodersen; P A Nilsson; L-A Hansson; C Brönmark
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.051

7.  The temporal distribution of directional gradients under selection for an optimum.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Benjamin C Haller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Fluctuating selection and its (elusive) evolutionary consequences in a wild rodent population.

Authors:  T Bonnet; E Postma
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Among-individual and within-individual variation in seasonal migration covaries with subsequent reproductive success in a partially migratory bird.

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Moray Souter; Sarah R Fenn; Paul Acker; Ana Payo-Payo; Sarah J Burthe; Sarah Wanless; Francis Daunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Reproductive performance of resident and migrant males, females and pairs in a partially migratory bird.

Authors:  Hannah Grist; Francis Daunt; Sarah Wanless; Sarah J Burthe; Mark A Newell; Mike P Harris; Jane M Reid
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modelling the responses of partially migratory metapopulations to changing seasonal migration rates: From theory to data.

Authors:  Ana Payo-Payo; Paul Acker; Greta Bocedi; Justin M J Travis; Sarah J Burthe; Michael P Harris; Sarah Wanless; Mark Newell; Francis Daunt; Jane M Reid
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 5.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.