Mei Gao1, Megan M Harper1, Miranda Lin1, Shadi A Qasem2, Reema A Patel3, Samuel H Mardini4, Moamen M Gabr4, Michael J Cavnar1, Prakash K Pandalai1, Joseph Kim5. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. 2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. 3. Divisions of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. 4. Gastroenterology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. 5. Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. Electronic address: joseph.kim@uky.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Organoids are excellent 3-dimensional in vitro models of gastrointestinal cancers. However, patient-derived organoids (PDOs) remain inconsistent and unreliable for rapid actionable drug sensitivity testing due to size variation and limited material. STUDY DESIGN: On day10/passage 2 after standard creation of organoids, half of PDOs were dissociated into single-cells with TrypLE Express Enzyme/DNase I and mechanical dissociation; and half of PDOs were expanded by the standard technique. Hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry with CK7 and CK20 were performed for characterization. Drug sensitivity testing was completed for single-cells and paired standard PDOs to assess reproducibility. RESULTS: After 2 to 3 days, >50% of single-cells reformed uniform miniature PDOs (∼50 μm). We developed 10 PDO single-cell lines (n = 4, gastric cancer, [GC]; and n = 6, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, [PDAC]), which formed epithelialized cystic structures and by IHC, exhibited CK7(high)/CK20(low) expression patterns mirroring parent tissues. Compared with paired standard PDOs, single-cells (n = 2, PDAC; = 2, GC) showed similar architecture, albeit smaller and more uniform. Importantly, single cells demonstrated similar sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs to matched PDOs. CONCLUSIONS: PDO single-cells are accurate for rapid clinical drug testing in gastrointestinal cancers. Using early passage PDO single-cells facilitates high-volume drug testing, decreasing time from tumor sampling to actionable clinical decisions, and provides a personalized medicine platform to optimally select drugs for gastrointestinal cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: Organoids are excellent 3-dimensional in vitro models of gastrointestinal cancers. However, patient-derived organoids (PDOs) remain inconsistent and unreliable for rapid actionable drug sensitivity testing due to size variation and limited material. STUDY DESIGN: On day10/passage 2 after standard creation of organoids, half of PDOs were dissociated into single-cells with TrypLE Express Enzyme/DNase I and mechanical dissociation; and half of PDOs were expanded by the standard technique. Hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry with CK7 and CK20 were performed for characterization. Drug sensitivity testing was completed for single-cells and paired standard PDOs to assess reproducibility. RESULTS: After 2 to 3 days, >50% of single-cells reformed uniform miniature PDOs (∼50 μm). We developed 10 PDO single-cell lines (n = 4, gastric cancer, [GC]; and n = 6, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, [PDAC]), which formed epithelialized cystic structures and by IHC, exhibited CK7(high)/CK20(low) expression patterns mirroring parent tissues. Compared with paired standard PDOs, single-cells (n = 2, PDAC; = 2, GC) showed similar architecture, albeit smaller and more uniform. Importantly, single cells demonstrated similar sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs to matched PDOs. CONCLUSIONS: PDO single-cells are accurate for rapid clinical drug testing in gastrointestinal cancers. Using early passage PDO single-cells facilitates high-volume drug testing, decreasing time from tumor sampling to actionable clinical decisions, and provides a personalized medicine platform to optimally select drugs for gastrointestinal cancer patients.
Authors: Toshiro Sato; Robert G Vries; Hugo J Snippert; Marc van de Wetering; Nick Barker; Daniel E Stange; Johan H van Es; Arie Abo; Pekka Kujala; Peter J Peters; Hans Clevers Journal: Nature Date: 2009-03-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Chantal Pauli; Benjamin D Hopkins; Davide Prandi; Reid Shaw; Tarcisio Fedrizzi; Andrea Sboner; Verena Sailer; Michael Augello; Loredana Puca; Rachele Rosati; Terra J McNary; Yelena Churakova; Cynthia Cheung; Joanna Triscott; David Pisapia; Rema Rao; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Brian Robinson; Bishoy M Faltas; Brooke E Emerling; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Brady Bernard; Olivier Elemento; Himisha Beltran; Francesca Demichelis; Christopher J Kemp; Carla Grandori; Lewis C Cantley; Mark A Rubin Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Mei Gao; Miranda Lin; Manisha Rao; Hannah Thompson; Kelsi Hirai; Minsig Choi; Georgios V Georgakis; Aaron R Sasson; Juan Carlos Bucobo; Demetri Tzimas; Lionel S D'Souza; Jonathan M Buscaglia; James Davis; Kenneth R Shroyer; Jinyu Li; Scott Powers; Joseph Kim Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Peter W Nagle; John Th M Plukker; Christina T Muijs; Peter van Luijk; Robert P Coppes Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2018-06-30 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Benjamin E Mead; Jose Ordovas-Montanes; Alexandra P Braun; Lauren E Levy; Prerna Bhargava; Matthew J Szucs; Dustin A Ammendolia; Melanie A MacMullan; Xiaolei Yin; Travis K Hughes; Marc H Wadsworth; Rushdy Ahmad; Seth Rakoff-Nahoum; Steven A Carr; Robert Langer; James J Collins; Alex K Shalek; Jeffrey M Karp Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 7.431
Authors: Megan M Harper; Miranda Lin; Michael J Cavnar; Prakash K Pandalai; Reema A Patel; Mei Gao; Joseph Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Megan M Harper; Miranda Lin; Shadi A Qasem; Reema A Patel; Michael J Cavnar; Prakash K Pandalai; Mei Gao; Joseph Kim Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 6.575