| Literature DB >> 33253321 |
Bo Lin1,2, Jia-Rui Zhang3, Hui-Juan Lu2, Lin Zhao1,2, Jing Chen2,4, Hong-Fei Zhang2, Xue-Song Wei1,2, Liang-Yu Zhang2, Xiao-Bing Wu1, Wen-Hui Lee2.
Abstract
Bungarus multicinctus is the most venomous snake distributed in China and neighboring countries of Myanmar, Laos, north Vietnam and Thailand. The high mortality rate of B. multicinctus envenomation is attributed to the lethal components of α-, β-, γ- and κ- bungarotoxins contained in the venom. Although anti-B. multicinctus sera were produced in Shanghai, Taiwan and Vietnam, the most widely clinic used product was term as B. multicinctus antivenin and manufactured by Shanghai Serum Bio-technology Co. Ltd. In the present investigation, high purity α-, β- and γ-bungarotoxins were separately isolated from B. multicinctus crude venom. Rabbit anti- α-, β- and γ-bungarotoxin antisera were prepared by common methods, respectively. LD50 values of α-, β- and γ-bungarotoxins were systematically determined via three administration pathways (intraperitoneal, intramuscular and intravenous injections) in Kunming mice. LD50 values of β-bungarotoxin were closely related with injection routines but those of both α- and γ-bungarotoxins were not dependent on the injection routines. Commercial B. multicinctus antivenin showed strong immunoreaction with high molecular weight fractions of the B. multicinctus but weakly recognized low molecular weight fractions like α- and γ-bungarotoxins. Although B. multicinctus antivenin showed immunoreaction with high molecular weight fractions of Bungarus fasciatus, Naja atra, Ophiophagus hannah venoms but the antivenin only demonstrated animal protection efficacy against O. hannah venom. These results indicated that the high molecular weight fractions of the O. hannah played an important role in venom lethality but those of B. fasciatus and N. atra did not have such a role.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33253321 PMCID: PMC7728252 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Molecular weight determination of purified bungarotoxins by MALDI/TOF mass spectrometer.
α-BGT (A). β-BGT (B). γ-BGT (C).
Summary of the available LD50 values of bungarotoxins via different administration routines.
| LD50 (μg/g) | Types of mice | Reference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| subcutaneous | ||||||
| - | - | - | ||||
| - | - | - | 0.16 | Mice (15–20 g) | Chang CC (1963) | |
| 0.08 | - | 0.071 | - | White mice (20–25 g) | Kocholaty WF (1971) | |
| - | - | 0.014 | - | ICR mice (20–25 g) | Ratanabanangkoon K (2016) | |
| α-BGT(A31) | - | |||||
| α-BGT | 0.23 | - | - | - | Outbreeding mice(18–20 g) | Kuch U (2003) |
| α-BGT | 0.14 | - | - | - | NIH strain(20–22 g) | Wu SH (1983) |
| α-BGT | - | - | - | 0.3 | Mice (15–20 g) | Chang CC (1963) |
| α-BGT | - | - | - | 0.14 | Swiss mice | Eterovic VA (1975) |
| α-BGT | 0.11 | - | - | - | Swiss mice | |
| α-BGT | 0.25 | - | - | - | Female ICR mice (20–30 g) | Crosland RD (1989) |
| β-BGT | - | |||||
| β-BGT | - | - | - | 0.089 | Mice (15–20 g) | Chang CC (1963) |
| β1-BGT | 0.019 | - | - | - | mice | Kondo K(1982) |
| β2-BGT | 0.028 | - | - | - | ||
| β3-BGT | 0.066 | - | - | - | ||
| β4-BGT | 0.072 | - | - | - | ||
| β5-BGT | 0.013 | - | - | - | ||
| SPI | 0.123 | - | - | - | Albino mice (20–25 g) | Chu CC (1994) |
| SPII | 0.043 | - | - | - | ||
| SPIII | 0.012 | - | - | - | ||
| β-BGT | - | - | 0.05 | - | Swiss mice (20–25 g) | Rosenberg P (1989) |
| β-BGT | 0.0097 | - | - | - | Female ICR mice (20–30 g) | Crosland RD (1989) |
| γ-BGT | - | |||||
| γ-BGT | - | - | 0.15 | - | Swiss mice | Aird SD (1999) |
| γ-BGT | - | - | - | 0.12 | Mice (15–20 g) | Chang CC (1963) |
| κ-BGT | - | - | - | - | ||
Abbreviations: α-BGT, α-bungarotoxin; β-BGT, β-bungarotoxin; γ-BGT, γ-bungarotoxin; κ-BGT, κ-bungarotoxin; SP I, SP II and SP III are different subtypes of β-bungarotoxin; “-”, no data available.
Fig 2Specificity of three prepared antisera.
SDS-PAGE of B. multicinctus venom under non-reducing conditions, 25 μg/sample (A). Western-blot profile of prepared anti-α-BGT, anti-β-BGT and anti-γ-BGT antisera against crude venom and corresponding bungarotoxins (B). For Western-blot, 2 μg of crude venom or purified neurotoxins were added in each lane. Bm: Crude venom of B. multicinctus.
Fig 3The immunoreactivity of antisera comparison by indirect ELISA.
Prepared anti-α-BGT antiserum against different antigens (A). Prepared anti-γ-BGT antiserum against different antigens (B). Prepared anti-β-BGT antiserum against different antigens (C). Commercial B. multicinctus antivenin against different antigens (D). The immunoreactivity determination of prepared antisera and the B. multicinctus antivenin (E). Antigens of 1μg/well were coated on a 96-well plate, results were expressed as mean ± SD.
Fig 4Immunoreactivity of the commercial B. multicinctus antivenin and the prepared antiserum against top Chinese dangerous terrestrial snake venoms.
SDS-PAGE of nine used snake venoms under non-reducing conditions, 25 μg/sample (A). Western blot revealed by B. multicinctus antivenin under non-reducing conditions (B). Western blot revealed by B. multicinctus antivenin under reducing conditions (C). Western blot revealed by normal horse IgG under non-reducing conditions (D). Western blot revealed by prepared anti-α-BGT antiserum under non-reducing conditions (E). Western blot revealed by prepared anti-β-BGT antiserum under non-reducing conditions (F). Western blot revealed by prepared anti-γ-BGT antiserum under non-reducing conditions (G). Western blot revealed by normal rabbit IgG under non-reducing conditions (H). Bm: B. multicinctus; Bf: B. fasciatus; Na: N. atra; Oh: O. hannah; Da: D. acutus; Ts: T. stejnegeri; Dr: Daboia russelii siamensis; Pm: P. mucrosquamatus; Gb: G. brevicaudus. 10 μg/sample was loaded for Western blot experiments.
ED50 determination of B. multicinctus antivenin and the prepared bungarotoxin antiserum against B. multicinctus venom and purified bungarotoxins.
| Antiserum | Toxins | LD50 (mg/kg) | Antiserum Dose (μg/mouse) | Number of mice (n = 6) | ED50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Died | Lived | |||||
| 0.09 | 62.5 | 6 | 0 | |||
| 125 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 250 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 500 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| α-BGT | 0.2 | 1000 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 2000 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 4000 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| 8000 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| β-BGT | 0.004 | 2.5 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 5 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| 10 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| 20 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| β-BGT antiserum | 0.09 | 62.5 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 125 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 250 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| 500 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| β-BGT | 0.004 | 2.5 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| 10 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| 20 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| α-BGT antiserum | α-BGT | 0.2 | 62.5 | 6 | 0 | |
| 125 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| 250 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| 500 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| 0.09 | 4000 | 6 | 0 | |||
| α-BGT antiserum plus β-BGT antiserum (1:1) | 0.09 | 62.5 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 125 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 250 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 500 | 0 | 6 | ||||
a ED50 values of antivenoms were expressed as mg of antivenoms per kg body weight of mouse to neutralize the challenge dose of venom.
The protective effects of antiserum against different snake venoms.
| antiserum | venoms | LD50 (mg/kg) | Antivenin Dose (μg/mouse) | Number of mice | ED50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Died | Lived | |||||
| 1.5 | 1000 | 6 | 0 | |||
| 2000 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 8000 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 16000 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| 0.5 | 1000 | 6 | 0 | |||
| 2000 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 8000 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 16000 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| 0.44 | 1000 | 6 | 0 | |||
| 2000 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| 8000 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| 16000 | 0 | 6 | ||||
a LD50 values of the crude venoms were determined by present work in Kunming mice.
b ED50 values of antivenoms were expressed as mg of antivenoms per kg body weight of mouse to neutralize the challenge dose of venom.