Literature DB >> 26707715

A predictive model for diagnosing stroke-related apraxia of speech.

Kirrie J Ballard1, Lamiae Azizi2, Joseph R Duffy3, Malcolm R McNeil4, Mark Halaki1, Nicholas O'Dwyer1, Claire Layfield1, Dominique I Scholl1, Adam P Vogel5, Donald A Robin6.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of the speech motor planning/programming disorder, apraxia of speech (AOS), has proven challenging, largely due to its common co-occurrence with the language-based impairment of aphasia. Currently, diagnosis is based on perceptually identifying and rating the severity of several speech features. It is not known whether all, or a subset of the features, are required for a positive diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to assess predictor variables for the presence of AOS after left-hemisphere stroke, with the goal of increasing diagnostic objectivity and efficiency. This population-based case-control study involved a sample of 72 cases, using the outcome measure of expert judgment on presence of AOS and including a large number of independently collected candidate predictors representing behavioral measures of linguistic, cognitive, nonspeech oral motor, and speech motor ability. We constructed a predictive model using multiple imputation to deal with missing data; the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) technique for variable selection to define the most relevant predictors, and bootstrapping to check the model stability and quantify the optimism of the developed model. Two measures were sufficient to distinguish between participants with AOS plus aphasia and those with aphasia alone, (1) a measure of speech errors with words of increasing length and (2) a measure of relative vowel duration in three-syllable words with weak-strong stress pattern (e.g., banana, potato). The model has high discriminative ability to distinguish between cases with and without AOS (c-index=0.93) and good agreement between observed and predicted probabilities (calibration slope=0.94). Some caution is warranted, given the relatively small sample specific to left-hemisphere stroke, and the limitations of imputing missing data. These two speech measures are straightforward to collect and analyse, facilitating use in research and clinical settings.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphasia; Apraxia of speech; Diagnosis; Lexical stress; Speech motor control; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26707715     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  15 in total

1.  A Multivariate Analytic Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Alexandra Basilakos; Grigori Yourganov; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Daniel Fogerty; Chris Rorden; Lynda Feenaughty; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Progressive agrammatic aphasia without apraxia of speech as a distinct syndrome.

Authors:  Katerina A Tetzloff; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Rene L Utianski; Edythe A Strand; Mary M Machulda; Hugo Botha; Peter R Martin; Christopher G Schwarz; Matthew L Senjem; Robert I Reid; Jeffrey L Gunter; Anthony J Spychalla; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Keith A Josephs; Jennifer L Whitwell
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Syncing Up for a Good Conversation: A Clinically Meaningful Methodology for Capturing Conversational Entrainment in the Speech Domain.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Megan M Willi; Visar Berisha
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Temporal acoustic measures distinguish primary progressive apraxia of speech from primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Joseph R Duffy; Holly Hanley; Rene Utianski; Heather Clark; Edythe Strand; Keith A Josephs; Jennifer L Whitwell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  Contemporary Approaches to the Management of Post-stroke Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Alexandra Basilakos
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.761

6.  Word-level prosodic measures and the differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Adam Jacks
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Clinical Progression in Four Cases of Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Rene L Utianski; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Edythe A Strand; Sarah M Boland; Mary M Machulda; Jennifer L Whitwell; Keith A Josephs
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Perceptually Salient Sound Distortions and Apraxia of Speech: A Performance Continuum.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Adam Jacks; Jessica D Richardson; Julie L Wambaugh
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  To Lump or to Split? Possible Subtypes of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 10.  Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech in Children and Adults: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kristen M Allison; Claire Cordella; Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.