Literature DB >> 33244786

Adaptive enrichment trials: What are the benefits?

Thomas Burnett1, Christopher Jennison2.   

Abstract

When planning a Phase III clinical trial, suppose a certain subset of patients is expected to respond particularly well to the new treatment. Adaptive enrichment designs make use of interim data in selecting the target population for the remainder of the trial, either continuing with the full population or restricting recruitment to the subset of patients. We define a multiple testing procedure that maintains strong control of the familywise error rate, while allowing for the adaptive sampling procedure. We derive the Bayes optimal rule for deciding whether or not to restrict recruitment to the subset after the interim analysis and present an efficient algorithm to facilitate simulation-based optimisation, enabling the construction of Bayes optimal rules in a wide variety of problem formulations. We compare adaptive enrichment designs with traditional nonadaptive designs in a broad range of examples and draw clear conclusions about the potential benefits of adaptive enrichment.
© 2020 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian optimization; adaptive designs; adaptive enrichment; phase III clinical trial; population enrichment

Year:  2020        PMID: 33244786      PMCID: PMC7839594          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Adaptive sample size calculations in group sequential trials.

Authors:  W Lehmacher; G Wassmer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: applications and practical considerations.

Authors:  Heinz Schmidli; Frank Bretz; Amy Racine; Willi Maurer
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts.

Authors:  Frank Bretz; Heinz Schmidli; Franz König; Amy Racine; Willi Maurer
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 4.  Adaptive seamless designs: selection and prospective testing of hypotheses.

Authors:  Christopher Jennison; Bruce W Turnbull
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 5.  Key multiplicity issues in clinical drug development.

Authors:  Alex Dmitrienko; Ralph B D'Agostino; Mohammad F Huque
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Improving Probabilities of Correct Interim Decision in Population Enrichment Designs.

Authors:  Heiko Götte; Margarita Donica; Giacomo Mordenti
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 1.051

7.  Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses.

Authors:  P Bauer; K Köhne
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology.

Authors:  Werner Brannath; Emmanuel Zuber; Michael Branson; Frank Bretz; Paul Gallo; Martin Posch; Amy Racine-Poon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Optimized adaptive enrichment designs.

Authors:  Thomas Ondra; Sebastian Jobjörnsson; Robert A Beckman; Carl-Fredrik Burman; Franz König; Nigel Stallard; Martin Posch
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Adaptive enrichment trials: What are the benefits?

Authors:  Thomas Burnett; Christopher Jennison
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.373

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Optimizing subgroup selection in two-stage adaptive enrichment and umbrella designs.

Authors:  Nicolás M Ballarini; Thomas Burnett; Thomas Jaki; Christoper Jennison; Franz König; Martin Posch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Adaptive enrichment trials: What are the benefits?

Authors:  Thomas Burnett; Christopher Jennison
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.373

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.