Literature DB >> 23044723

Key multiplicity issues in clinical drug development.

Alex Dmitrienko1, Ralph B D'Agostino, Mohammad F Huque.   

Abstract

Much progress has been made over the past decade with the development of novel methods for addressing increasingly more complex multiplicity problems arising in confirmatory Phase III clinical trials. This includes traditional problems with a single source of multiplicity, for example, analysis of multiple endpoints or dose-placebo contrasts. In addition, more advanced problems with several sources of multiplicity have attracted attention in clinical drug development. These problems include two or more families of objectives such as multiple endpoints evaluated at multiple dose levels or in multiple patient populations. This paper provides a review of concepts that play a central role in defining and solving multiplicity problems (error rate definitions) and introduces main classes of multiple testing procedures widely used in clinical trials (nonparametric, semiparametric, and parametric procedures). The paper also presents recent advances in multiplicity research, including gatekeeping procedures for clinical trials with multiple sets of objectives. The concepts and methods introduced in the paper are illustrated using several case studies on the basis of real clinical trials. Software implementation of commonly used multiple testing and gatekeeping procedures is discussed.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044723     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

Review 1.  Design, data monitoring, and analysis of clinical trials with co-primary endpoints: A review.

Authors:  Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Scott R Evans; Koko Asakura
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  An optimal Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test of mortality and a continuous outcome.

Authors:  Roland A Matsouaka; Aneesh B Singhal; Rebecca A Betensky
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Neck adipose tissue accumulation is associated with higher overall and central adiposity, a higher cardiometabolic risk, and a pro-inflammatory profile in young adults.

Authors:  Maria Jose Arias-Tellez; Francisco M Acosta; Yolanda Garcia-Rivero; Jose Miguel Pascual-Gamarra; Elisa Merchan-Ramirez; Borja Martinez-Tellez; Analiza M Silva; Julio Almansa Lopez; Jose M Llamas-Elvira; Jonatan R Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 4.  Veterinary homeopathy: systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised trials controlled by other than placebo.

Authors:  Robert T Mathie; Jürgen Clausen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Validation of a multiprotein plasma classifier to identify benign lung nodules.

Authors:  Anil Vachani; Harvey I Pass; William N Rom; David E Midthun; Eric S Edell; Michel Laviolette; Xiao-Jun Li; Pui-Yee Fong; Stephen W Hunsucker; Clive Hayward; Peter J Mazzone; David K Madtes; York E Miller; Michael G Walker; Jing Shi; Paul Kearney; Kenneth C Fang; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Interventions supporting long term adherence and decreasing cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction (ISLAND): pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Jon-David Schwalm; Zachary Bouck; Tara McCready; Monica Taljaard; Sherry L Grace; Jennifer Cunningham; Beth Bosiak; Justin Presseau; Holly O Witteman; Neville Suskin; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Clare Atzema; R Sacha Bhatia; Madhu Natarajan; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-06-10

7.  Optimizing subgroup selection in two-stage adaptive enrichment and umbrella designs.

Authors:  Nicolás M Ballarini; Thomas Burnett; Thomas Jaki; Christoper Jennison; Franz König; Martin Posch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Adaptive enrichment trials: What are the benefits?

Authors:  Thomas Burnett; Christopher Jennison
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.