| Literature DB >> 33244113 |
Chung-Shien Wu1, Edi Sudianto1, Yu-Mei Hung2, Bo-Cyun Wang1, Chiun-Jr Huang3, Chi-Tsong Chen4, Shu-Miaw Chaw5.
Abstract
Cypresses are characterized by their longevity and valuable timber. In Taiwan, two endemic cypress species, Chamaecyparis formosensis and C. obtusa var. formosana, are threatened by prevalent illegal logging. A DNA barcode system is urgently needed for reforestation and conservation of these two cypresses. In this study, both plastomes and 35S rDNAs from 16, 10, and 6 individuals of C. formosensis, C. obtusa var. formosana, and C. obtusa var. obtusa were sequenced, respectively. We show that the loss of plastid trnT-GGU readily distinguishes C. formosensis from its congeneric species. We demonstrate that entire sequences of plastomes or 35S rDNAs are capable of correctly identifying cypress species and varieties, suggesting that they are effective super-barcodes. We also discover three short hypervariable loci (i.e., 3'ETS, ITS1, and trnH-psbA) that are promising barcodes for identifying cypress species and varieties. Moreover, nine species-specific indels of > 100 bp were detected in the cypress plastomes. These indels, together with the three aforementioned short barcodes, constitute an alternative and powerful barcode system crucial for identifying specimens that are fragmentary or contain degraded/poor DNA. Our sequenced data and barcode systems not only enrich the genetic reference for cypresses, but also contribute to future reforestation, conservation, and forensic investigations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33244113 PMCID: PMC7693304 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77492-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Photos of adult-leaves and winged seeds of C. formosensis (a) and C. obtusa var. formosana (b). The scale-bar unit is 1 mm.
Characteristics of plastomes and nuclear 35S rDNAs in Chamaecyparis.
| Taxon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size (Kb) | 126.8‒127.2 | 127.3‒127.6 | 127.8 | 127.1 |
| No. of genes | 119 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| GC content (%) | 35.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 |
| Size (Kb) | 9.5‒10.1 | 8.9‒9.5 | NA3 | NA |
| No. of genes | 3 | 3 | NA | NA |
| GC content (%) | 52.9‒53.0 | 53.0‒53.2 | NA | NA |
1Including C. obtusa var. obtusa and C. obtusa var. formosana; 2Including 5′ETS and 3′ETS; 3NA: not available.
Figure 2Circular maps of Chamaecyparis plastomes (above closed circle) and nuclear 35S rDNA (below open circle). Average inter-species and inter-variety pairwise substitution rates are depicted by histograms with gray-rose and steel-cyan colors, respectively. Repeat pairs are linked with lines. The region highlighted with blue is inverted in C. hodginsii and C. lawsoniana. A transfer RNA gene, trnT-GGU (bold), is uniquely missing in C. formosensis. Eight hypervariable loci are denoted by thick grey bars and Arabic numerals.
Figure 3ML trees inferred from the entire plastome (a) and 35S rDNA (b) sequences. The trees are condensed under the 50% majority-rule consensus. Bootstrap values estimated from 1000 pseudo-replicates are shown at the nodes. Taxa are indicated by their voucher numbers, and population localities are denoted by letters within parentheses.
Figure 4Estimated relationships between inter-species and inter-variety pairwise NSRs in the cypress plastomes (a) and 35S rDNAs (b).
Nuclear 35S rDNA and plastomic loci examined for identification of cypresses species and varieties.
| Locus | Type | Length (bp) | Pairwise distance (substitutions per site) | BS value (%) for monophyly | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inter-species | Intra-species | Inter-variety | Intra-variety | CF1 | CVF | CVO | |||
| 5′ETS1 | Nucleus | 511‒514 | 0.123‒0.131 | 0‒0.006 | 0.004‒0.006 | 0‒0.002 | 99 | ND2 | 88 |
| 5′ETS2 | Nucleus | 920‒938 | 0.092‒0.1 | 0‒0.01 | 0.004‒0.01 | 0‒0.004 | 99 | ND | 96 |
| 3′ETS | Nucleus | 524‒816 | 0.196‒0.234 | 0‒0.05 | 0.011‒0.05 | 0‒0.038 | 99 | 65 | 79 |
| ITS1 | Nucleus | 733‒734 | 0.114‒0.118 | 0‒0.014 | 0.008‒0.014 | 0‒0.005 | 99 | 98 | 79 |
| Plastome | 1375‒1835 | 0.308‒0.33 | 0‒0.03 | 0.004‒0.01 | 0‒0.005 | 100 | 70 | ND | |
| Plastome | 1290‒1327 | 0.069‒0.073 | 0‒0.001 | 0‒0.001 | 0‒0.001 | 99 | ND | ND | |
| Plastome | 548‒773 | 0.159‒0.168 | 0‒0.002 | 0‒0.002 | 0‒0.002 | 99 | ND | 86 | |
| Plastome | 1057‒1189 | 0.065‒0.085 | 0‒0.042 | 0.003‒0.032 | 0.001‒0.042 | 99 | ND | ND | |
| Plastome | 438‒461 | 0.036‒0.038 | 0‒0.002 | 0.002 | 0 | 99 | 63 | 63 | |
| Plastome | 1530‒1533 | 0.012‒0.014 | 0‒0.001 | 0.001 | 0‒0.001 | 99 | 61 | ND | |
| Plastome | 1428 | 0.006‒0.007 | 0‒0.001 | 0.001 | 0 | 99 | 67 | ND | |
| Plastome | 2274‒2277 | 0.039‒0.04 | 0‒0.002 | 0.001‒0.002 | 0‒0.001 | 99 | 67 | 87 | |
1CF: C. formosensis; CVF: C. obtusa var. formosana; CVO: C. obtusa var. obtusa; 2ND: not detected; 3Loci highlighted in bold are promising markers proposed in previous studies.
Figure 5Summary of species-specific (black bar) and variety-specific (grey bar) indels found in the cypress plastomes (a) and 35S rDNAs (b).