| Literature DB >> 33244085 |
Varun Paul1, Yogaraj Banerjee2, Prosenjit Ghosh2,3, Susheel Bhanu Busi4.
Abstract
The solar salterns in Tuticorin, India, are man-made,Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33244085 PMCID: PMC7693307 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77622-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Google Map showing location of Tuticorin (yellow pin), Tamil Nadu, South India (a), Google map location of the reservoir ponds (yellow star) from which the microbial mat samples was collected (b), and the reservoir pond (c) showing the white (white arrow) microbial mat in the far end and green (grey arrow) microbial mat coating the bottom surface of the pond. (a) and (b) obtained from Google maps (https://www.google.com/maps/) and scale bars added in Microsoft PowerPoint.
Figure 2Cross-section of the green and white mats isolated from the reservoir ponds. The different layers sectioned based on visual observations and their assigned designations in both mats are shown.
Figure 3Dendrogram showing the hierarchical clustering of the microbial population (a) and predicted metabolic pathways (c). The scale shown in (a) and (c) represent the branch lengths, estimated as a function of the similarity between the samples based on Euclidean distances, and clustering the samples with Ward’s clustering algorithm. The 3D plots based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix depict the variability across the selected principal components for the microbial population (b) and predicted metabolic pathways (d). The explained variances are shown in brackets in (b) and (d). Images generated through MicrobiomeAnalystR package (https://github.com/xia-lab/MicrobiomeAnalystR) built for R[121].
Figure 4The distribution of phyla in the microbial mat samples showing the various archaeal and bacterial members based on their relative abundance. The green and white mats are shown in adjacent boxes. TOP: top portion of the mat; DG: Dark Green (middle); BOT: Bottom; and BTZ: additional bottom section extracted from the white mat.
Figure 5Sample clustering and the top 25 most detected predicted metabolic pathways are depicted in the Heatmap based on Euclidean distance measures, and Ward’s clustering algorithm. Each row represents a single KEGG orthology, while the samples are arranged in columns. The ‘ko’ numbers in the ID are codes for individual orthologs generated in the program, while the second half of the description refers to the metabolic categories at the level-3 annotation within the KEGG database. Images generated through MicrobiomeAnalystR package (https://github.com/xia-lab/MicrobiomeAnalystR) built for R[121].
Figure 6Depth-wise changes of δ13C and δ15N (‰) isotopic signature along with the major phyla (P) and other taxonomic subgroups (C, Class; O, order). The isotopic values for both white and green mats were chosen from the top, mid-DG, and bottom (Bot) sections at depths 0–1.5 cm, 1.5–2.5 cm, 2.5–5 cm, respectively. Similarly, the community representation was taken as an average of both white and green mats, with the values indicating the percentage within each taxa and not the percentage of the total sequences.