Tessa Strain1,2, Katrien Wijndaele3, Leandro Garcia3,4, Melanie Cowan5, Regina Guthold6, Soren Brage3, Fiona C Bull7,8. 1. MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK tessa.strain@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk. 2. Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 3. MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 4. Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. 5. Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 6. Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health and Ageing Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 7. Department of Health Promotion, Division of Universal Health Coverage and Healthier Populations, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 8. Physical Activity Unit, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
The physical and mental health benefits of physical activity are well established,1–3 yet 27.5% of the global adult population do not reach the minimum recommended levels.4 The World Health Organization (WHO) member states agreed to a 15% reduction in physical inactivity levels by 20302 but this is unlikely to be achieved, given current trajectories.4Physical activity is a complex behaviour; however, opportunities to be active exist in several domains in life: at work, household or at school, for travel or during leisure time. Different domains may contribute to health in different ways.5 Understanding the composition of how and where people accumulate their activity has important implications for policy, clinical practice and future public health investments. Economic development and its associated technological, demographic and societal changes have the potential to influence the opportunities for activity across different settings.6 7 One way of investigating these patterns is by comparing domain-specific physical activity behaviour between countries at different stages of economic development.Occupational physical activity is influenced by the country’s urbanisation level and occupational structure, with more urbanised, service-dominated countries showing lower levels.8 Leisure activity levels appear to be higher in high compared with low-income countries,9 although even between high-income countries, levels of urbanisation and wealth seem to be positively associated with leisure activity prevalence.10 Active travel patterns are less clear by income group as high-income countries provide examples of both high and low levels. For instance, active travel accounts for half of all journeys in the Netherlands and Switzerland but only a quarter in the UK and California,11 suggesting differences in available transport infrastructure, social norms or both. This illustrates the complexity of the global perspective on domain-specific physical activity levels, something that has not been systematically researched.Older age and female sex are known correlates of lower overall physical activity levels.12 13 While a number studies have shown differences in the absolute levels of domain-specific activity,14–16 few have explored how the relative contributions by age and sex differ.17 18 Understanding whether different at-risk subgroups rely on certain physical activity domains more than others is critical information for policy-makers to protect existing and promote new behaviours and to help reduce health inequalities.This study uses the latest internationally comparable physical activity data to compare the absolute and relative contributions of physical activity at work and in the household, for travel and during leisure time to total moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) for 104 countries across the spectrum of economic development. As a secondary aim, we also compared the domain-specific MVPA contributions by sex and age group.
Methods
Data sources
We obtained the most recent individual-level survey data from 104 countries and territories (hereafter called countries) in which the WHO Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) was used.19 These included 94 surveys using the WHO STEPwise approach to non-communicable disease surveillance (STEPS),20 6 from the WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE),21 and 4 from public archives (see Acknowledgments and Data Availability statements for details).The countries covered were from all six WHO regions: Africa (n=37), Americas (n=15), Eastern Mediterranean (n=12), Europe (n=8), South-East Asia (n=8) and Western Pacific (n=24). According to World Bank Income Classification (2020),22 24 were low, 24 were lower-middle, 30 were upper-middle, and 16 were high-income countries (online supplemental file 1). These countries make up 71% of the global population in 2020.23In addition, an earlier STEPS survey was identified for four countries in the African region (Benin, Botswana, Malawi, Seychelles) for an exploratory analysis of domain-specific trends. These were countries within the same region, spanning all income classification groups, and with national data from two points in time with a minimum time gap of 5 years between them and the most recent time point within the last 5 years.
Representativeness of data
Survey sampling was designed to obtain a nationally representative (n=90 + 4 trend datasets) or a subnational (n=14) sample. In the majority of cases, this was a stratified multistage clustered design but some of the subnational surveys or smaller islands used simple random, quota or interval sampling, or a census (online supplemental file 2). Sample weights were provided for 91 (+3 trend) surveys to adjust for unequal selection probabilities. These also adjusted for the oversampling of those ≥50 years in the SAGE surveys, and normalised to population distributions of age, sex and in some cases region and ethnicity in the publicly available surveys.Eight of the subnational surveys were urban only. For these, we imputed rural data and weighted them by national urban–rural prevalence to derive national estimates. In the urban–rural mixed subnational survey, we performed this weighting step with the data collected. The remaining five subnational surveys were analysed with no adjustment. Full methods are provided in online supplemental file 3.The analysis was limited to the common age-range across all surveys (25–64 years) for comparability reasons so the estimates presented in this paper are not official national statistics.
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire
We only included surveys which had used the WHO GPAQ. This instrument captures MVPA undertaken in a typical week at work (paid or unpaid, including household chores), for travel to and from places by walking or cycling, and during leisure time (including sports and fitness-enhancing activities).19 Work/household and leisure domains are split into moderate and vigorous intensity. Only MVPA undertaken in bouts of 10 min or more is reported, and participants are reminded not to report activities already included in an earlier answer. The GPAQ was translated into national languages, and back translated for quality assurance, and show-cards were used to provide culturally relevant examples of physical activities in each domain.The GPAQ has shown comparable levels of validity to other self-report instruments across a variety of cultural settings.24–28 In the absence of domain-specific validity evidence, we estimated the Pearson’s correlation coefficients for the associations between the country-level domain-specific MVPA (median min/week) and indicators selected a priori (online supplemental file 4). These were work/household and the proportion of the workforce in the agricultural sector (males: r=0.43, females: r=0.46) and other occupations involving a high degree of manual labour (males: r=0.47, females: r=0.48); travel and the number of vehicle registrations per adult in the population (r=−0.49); and leisure and the GINI measure of economic inequality across the population (r=0.03), and the Human Development Index (r=0.27).
Data processing
The standard GPAQ data processing protocol was followed.19 Individuals reporting implausible (>16 hours/day in one of the domains) or inconsistent (eg, no days but valid duration) were excluded. We considered moderate and vigorous intensity work/household and leisure physical activity separately for this step. We further excluded those with missing data in either the frequency or duration variables in any domain (online supplemental file 5). We calculated total weekly duration in minutes for each individual by multiplying the number of days and daily time variables for each domain and summing the totals. For the main analysis, we combined the moderate and vigorous components of work/household and leisure as reported. In a sensitivity analysis, we doubled the reported duration of vigorous intensity activity to reflect the physical activity guidelines that suggest 75 min of vigorous intensity activity provides comparable benefits to 150 min of moderate intensity activity.3We estimated the absolute levels of domain-specific MVPA (min/week) at a country level, and by sex and age group (25–44 and 45–64 years) strata based on all those meeting the inclusion criteria. We calculated relative contributions at an individual level, and group-level arithmetic means were presented. Those who reported no MVPA across all domains could not provide any information to the relative contributions (online supplemental file 5). We described differences with reference to the World Bank Income Classification 2020.22 We estimated Pearson’s correlation coefficients for the associations between the mean domain-specific MVPA and total MVPA at a country level. We performed the analyses in Stata V.16 (StataCorp) and produced the ternary plots in R Studio using the ggtern29 and tricolore packages.30
Public involvement
The experiences of data collectors informed the development of the GPAQ,24 and assisted in the cultural and language adaptations made for each country.
Results
We included data from 327 789 individuals aged 25–64 years from 104 countries collected between 2002 and 2019. The prevalence of meeting the WHO physical activity guidelines ranged between 36% and 98%, and the proportion reporting zero min/week of total MVPA ranged between 1% and 51% (table 1).
Table 1
Descriptive characteristics of the survey samples of participants aged 25–64 years from 104 countries
Country
Year
Sample size
N (%) female
N (%) 25–44 years
N (%) reporting 0 min/week overall activity
N (%) meeting the WHO physical activity guidelines
Low-income countries
Afghanistan
2018
2673
1351 (50.6)
1910 (71.5)
561 (21.0)
1865 (69.8)
Benin
2015
3963
1998 (50.4)
2824 (71.3)
454 (11.5)
3308 (83.5)
Burkina Faso
2013
3782
2015 (53.3)
2645 (69.9)
341 (9.0)
3153 (83.4)
Central African Republic
2017
2800
1380 (49.3)
2016 (72.0)
97 (3.5)
2665 (95.2)
Chad
2008
1622
795 (49.0)
1063 (65.5)
245 (15.1)
1196 (73.7)
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2005
1194
740 (62.0)
846 (70.9)
205 (17.2)
902 (75.5)
Eritrea
2010
5380
4579 (85.1)
3792 (70.5)
394 (7.3)
4755 (88.4)
Ethiopia
2006
3879
2257 (58.2)
2219 (57.2)
120 (3.1)
3199 (82.5)
Gambia
2010
3888
2019 (51.9)
2879 (74.1)
599 (15.4)
3172 (81.6)
Guinea
2009
1661
837 (50.4)
1149 (69.2)
101 (6.1)
1457 (87.7)
Liberia
2011
2287
1150 (50.3)
1563 (68.3)
423 (18.5)
1686 (73.7)
Madagascar
2005
3999
2054 (51.4)
2763 (69.1)
374 (9.4)
3369 (84.2)
Malawi
2017
2552
1315 (51.5)
1904 (74.6)
15 (0.6)
2508 (98.3)
Mali
2013
691
457 (66.1)
378 (54.7)
155 (22.4)
449 (65.0)
Mozambique
2005
2853
1618 (56.7)
1982 (69.5)
31 (1.1)
2747 (96.3)
Nepal
2019
4356
2325 (53.4)
2915 (66.9)
202 (4.6)
4069 (93.4)
Niger
2007
2050
921 (44.9)
1180 (57.6)
349 (17.0)
1550 (75.6)
Rwanda
2012–2013
5495
2933 (53.4)
3939 (71.7)
374 (6.8)
4787 (87.1)
Sierra Leone
2009
2413
1248 (51.7)
1692 (70.1)
185 (7.7)
2120 (87.9)
Tajikistan
2016–2017
2108
947 (44.9)
1643 (77.9)
357 (17.0)
1498 (71.1)
Togo
2010–2011
2871
1531 (53.3)
2059 (71.7)
116 (4.0)
2631 (91.6)
Uganda
2014
2820
1449 (51.4)
2099 (74.4)
72 (2.6)
2698 (95.7)
United Republic of Tanzania
2012
8100
4128 (51.0)
5905 (72.9)
203 (2.5)
7693 (95.0)
United Republic of Tanzania (Zanzibar)
2011
2621
1374 (52.4)
1909 (72.8)
92 (3.5)
2308 (88.1)
Lower-middle-income countries
Bangladesh
2018
6866
3456 (50.3)
4497 (65.5)
459 (6.7)
6048 (88.1)
Bhutan
2014
2339
1008 (43.1)
1694 (72.4)
82 (3.5)
2201 (94.1)
Cabo Verde
2007
1724
869 (50.4)
1317 (76.4)
120 (6.9)
1434 (83.2)
Cambodia
2010
5432
2789 (51.3)
3564 (65.6)
298 (5.5)
4960 (91.3)
Cameroon
2003
5253
3289 (62.6)
3618 (68.9)
627 (11.9)
3388 (64.5)
Comoros
2011
4646
2329 (50.1)
3147 (67.7)
252 (5.4)
4082 (87.9)
Côte d'Ivoire
2005
2593
1382 (53.3)
1938 (74.7)
334 (12.9)
1773 (68.4)
Egypt
2017
4984
2478 (49.7)
3235 (64.9)
712 (14.3)
3679 (73.8)
Eswatini
2014
2017
1138 (56.4)
1426 (70.7)
190 (9.4)
1676 (83.1)
Ghana
2007–2008
2985
1463 (49.0)
1800 (60.3)
288 (9.7)
2580 (86.4)
India
2007–2008
7770
3667 (47.2)
4888 (62.9)
449 (5.8)
7026 (90.4)
Kenya
2015
3421
1732 (50.6)
2529 (73.9)
103 (3.0)
3234 (94.5)
Kiribati
2015–2016
1618
866 (53.5)
1032 (63.8)
332 (20.5)
1043 (64.4)
Kyrgyzstan
2013
2620
1297 (49.5)
1639 (62.6)
178 (6.8)
2320 (88.6)
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
2013
2124
1234 (58.1)
1244 (58.5)
58 (2.7)
1946 (91.6)
Lesotho
2012
1791
924 (51.6)
1362 (76.0)
33 (1.8)
1710 (95.5)
Mauritania
2006
1095
609 (55.6)
587 (53.6)
190 (17.4)
571 (52.1)
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
2016
1643
823 (50.1)
1142 (69.5)
529 (32.2)
1000 (60.9)
Moldova, Republic of
2013
3805
1848 (48.6)
2156 (56.7)
218 (5.7)
3409 (89.6)
Mongolia
2019
5429
2768 (51.0)
3506 (64.6)
853 (15.7)
4089 (75.3)
Morocco
2017
4088
2106 (51.5)
2511 (61.4)
490 (12.0)
3296 (80.6)
Myanmar
2014
8143
4052 (49.8)
4959 (60.9)
701 (8.6)
6872 (84.4)
Niue
2011–2012
581
319 (54.9)
271 (46.6)
10 (1.7)
554 (95.4)
Pakistan
2013–2014
5309
3101 (58.4)
3644 (68.6)
1426 (26.9)
3156 (59.5)
Papua New Guinea
2007–2008
1899
913 (48.1)
1368 (72.0)
132 (7.0)
1670 (88.0)
Solomon Islands
2015
1912
999 (52.3)
1328 (69.4)
197 (10.3)
1592 (83.2)
Sudan
2016
5799
2742 (47.3)
4033 (69.5)
325 (5.6)
4952 (85.4)
São Tomé and Principe
2008
2261
1192 (52.7)
1558 (68.9)
147 (6.5)
1975 (87.4)
Timor-Leste
2014
1792
723 (40.3)
1196 (66.7)
130 (7.3)
1455 (81.2)
Tokelau
2014
439
240 (54.6)
261 (59.5)
28 (6.3)
386 (87.9)
Vanuatu
2011
4457
2343 (52.6)
3031 (68.0)
91 (2.0)
4177 (93.7)
Viet Nam
2015
3116
1605 (51.5)
1866 (59.9)
556 (17.9)
2302 (73.9)
West Bank and Gaza Strip
2010–2011
5105
2536 (49.7)
3580 (70.1)
1336 (26.2)
3050 (59.7)
Zambia
2017
2550
1253 (49.1)
1916 (75.1)
139 (5.5)
2276 (89.3)
Upper-middle-income countries
Algeria
2016–2017
5566
2789 (50.1)
3677 (66.1)
741 (13.3)
4193 (75.3)
American Samoa
2004
2015
1010 (50.1)
1354 (67.2)
941 (46.7)
845 (41.9)
Armenia
2016
1825
877 (48.1)
1046 (57.3)
283 (15.5)
1437 (78.8)
Azerbaijan
2017
2322
1196 (51.5)
1343 (57.8)
269 (11.6)
1889 (81.3)
Belarus
2016–2017
4203
2178 (51.8)
2162 (51.4)
301 (7.2)
3682 (87.6)
Botswana
2014
2688
1343 (49.9)
1939 (72.2)
270 (10.0)
2118 (78.8)
Brazil
2013–2014
21 942
11 692 (53.3)
12 721 (58.0)
6105 (27.8)
14 509 (66.1)
China
2008–2010
9055
4574 (50.5)
4235 (46.8)
1187 (13.1)
7130 (78.7)
Cook Islands
2013–2015
1064
536 (50.4)
636 (59.8)
169 (15.8)
800 (75.2)
Ecuador
2018
3620
1879 (51.9)
2041 (56.4)
304 (8.4)
2977 (82.2)
Fiji
2011
2325
1173 (50.4)
1369 (58.9)
144 (6.2)
1973 (84.9)
Gabon
2009
1958
1144 (58.4)
1269 (64.8)
231 (11.8)
1418 (72.4)
Georgia
2016
3346
1743 (52.1)
1726 (51.6)
322 (9.6)
2776 (83.0)
Grenada
2010–2011
1030
502 (48.8)
674 (65.4)
184 (17.8)
733 (71.1)
Guyana
2016
2051
1017 (49.6)
1254 (61.1)
391 (19.1)
1444 (70.4)
Iraq
2015
3036
1505 (49.6)
1981 (65.2)
853 (28.1)
1615 (53.2)
Jordan
2019
4350
2325 (53.5)
2979 (68.5)
476 (10.9)
3250 (74.7)
Lebanon
2017
1426
764 (53.6)
885 (62.1)
726 (50.9)
548 (38.4)
Libya
2009
3460
1740 (50.3)
2692 (77.8)
783 (22.6)
2194 (63.4)
Maldives
2011
1222
615 (50.3)
911 (74.6)
320 (26.2)
756 (61.9)
Marshall Islands
2002
1806
1100 (60.9)
1271 (70.4)
751 (41.6)
997 (55.2)
Mexico
2009–2010
1324
717 (54.1)
906 (68.4)
192 (14.5)
962 (72.6)
Nauru
2015–2016
1031
534 (51.8)
719 (69.8)
267 (25.9)
617 (59.8)
Russian Federation
2007–2010
2306
1284 (55.7)
1248 (54.1)
115 (5.0)
2146 (93.1)
Saint Lucia
2012
1673
1039 (62.1)
853 (51.0)
268 (16.0)
1226 (73.3)
Samoa
2013
1412
681 (48.2)
901 (63.8)
118 (8.4)
1216 (86.1)
South Africa
2007–2008
2447
1291 (52.8)
1476 (60.3)
915 (37.4)
1374 (56.2)
Sri Lanka
2014–2015
4321
2184 (50.6)
2436 (56.4)
837 (19.4)
3029 (70.1)
Tonga
2017
3201
2068 (64.6)
1940 (60.6)
826 (25.8)
1920 (60.0)
Tuvalu
2015
935
489 (52.3)
590 (63.1)
141 (15.1)
689 (73.6)
High-income countries
Anguilla
2016
1347
695 (51.6)
782 (58.0)
235 (17.4)
1014 (75.3)
Bahamas
2011–2012
1617
806 (49.8)
998 (61.7)
524 (32.4)
955 (59.0)
Barbados
2007
934
489 (52.4)
566 (60.6)
207 (22.2)
599 (64.1)
British Virgin Islands
2009
1065
486 (45.6)
572 (53.7)
189 (17.8)
780 (73.3)
Brunei Darussalam
2015–2016
2761
1418 (51.4)
1793 (64.9)
318 (11.5)
2050 (74.2)
Cayman Islands
2012
1266
624 (49.3)
800 (63.2)
222 (17.5)
922 (72.8)
Chile
2016–2017
3831
1919 (50.1)
2108 (55.0)
668 (17.4)
2699 (70.4)
French Polynesia
2010
2862
1379 (48.2)
1815 (63.4)
225 (7.9)
2440 (85.3)
Korea, Rep.
2018
4038
1987 (49.2)
1938 (48.0)
1274 (31.6)
1866 (46.2)
Kuwait
2014
3160
1678 (53.1)
2170 (68.7)
1613 (51.0)
1131 (35.8)
Palau
2016
1173
553 (47.1)
569 (48.5)
261 (22.3)
783 (66.8)
Qatar
2012
2003
1006 (50.2)
1411 (70.5)
466 (23.3)
1182 (59.0)
Seychelles
2013–2014
1239
618 (49.8)
716 (57.8)
59 (4.7)
1007 (81.3)
Trinidad and Tobago
2011
2151
1113 (51.7)
1287 (59.8)
613 (28.5)
1285 (59.8)
USA
2017–2018
3628
1855 (51.1)
1800 (49.6)
726 (20.0)
2504 (69.0)
Uruguay
2013–2014
2090
1091(52.2)
1157 (55.4)
302 (14.5)
1613 (77.2)
Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Micronesia Fed. Sts. and Pakistan are subnational surveys. Total sample size is unweighted, all other N/proportions are weighted when sample weights have been provided. Meeting the WHO physical activity guidelines is defined as ≥150 min of moderate intensity activity per week, or ≥75 min of vigorous intensity activity per week, or ≥600 MET-min/week.
Descriptive characteristics of the survey samples of participants aged 25–64 years from 104 countriesCameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Micronesia Fed. Sts. and Pakistan are subnational surveys. Total sample size is unweighted, all other N/proportions are weighted when sample weights have been provided. Meeting the WHO physical activity guidelines is defined as ≥150 min of moderate intensity activity per week, or ≥75 min of vigorous intensity activity per week, or ≥600 MET-min/week.
Absolute levels of domain-specific activity
The distributions of the reported weekly durations of work/household, travel and leisure MVPA were highly skewed for all countries; the mode was almost always zero min/week (online supplemental file 6). The country-level means for the domains were 950 (IQR 618–1198), 327 (190–405) and 104 (51–131) min/week, for work/household, travel and leisure time, respectively (table 2, figure 1, online supplementary file 6). Mean work/household MVPA in low-income countries was almost twice that of high-income countries (1233 vs 668 min/week). However, the reverse was seen for mean leisure MVPA (72 vs 143 min/week). Travel MVPA was approximately three times higher in low-income versus high-income countries (499 vs 158 min/week). We found a very strong correlation between work/household MVPA and total MVPA (r=0.95) at the country level. The correlation was 0.58 for travel and 0.04 for leisure MVPA.
Table 2
Mean domain-specific min/week, relative contributions and rank order for the 104 countries, by income classification, sex and age group
All countries
World Bank income classification
Men
Women
25–44 years
45–64 years
Low
Lower-middle
Upper-middle
High
Number of countries
104
24
34
30
16
104
104
104
104
Mean min/week(IQR)
Work/household
950(618–1198)
1233(915–1600)
1069(735–1424)
740(505–923)
668(468–924)
1137(805–1501)
777(457–1036)
986(667–1268)
883(523–1149)
Travel
327(190–405)
499(348–609)
320(260–386)
287(188–338)
158(110–184)
373(237–470)
284(147–365)
328(182–410)
323(204–418)
Leisure
104(51–131)
72(35–109)
97(43–124)
118(52–157)
143(108–193)
141(71–184)
70(27–99)
120(59–158)
76(30–102)
Mean relative contribution to total MVPA (IQR)
Work/household
52.3(44.3–63.3)
57.3(54.1–68.0)
57.2(48.8–68.8)
47.5(41.6–56.7)
43.7(39.3–54.8)
53.0(46.0–63.3)
51.6(42.0–65.4)
52.7(44.7–64.4)
51.6(43.7–63.9)
Travel
36.0(25.3–45.3)
38.3(28.0–39.4)
34.6(24.5–42.7)
39.7(29.0–48.8)
28.5(19.6–34.1)
33.8(24.1–42.3)
38.3(26.3–47.7)
34.4(24.2–42.2)
39.0(27.6–48.0)
Leisure
11.7(4.4–15.4)
4.4(2.5–5.8)
8.2(3.7–10.8)
12.8(8.3–15.7)
27.8(20.5–33.3)
13.2(5.9–17.7)
10.1(2.6–14.2)
12.9(4.7–18.1)
9.3(2.9–12.4)
Rank order (n)
W>T> L
70
20
29
17
4
68
65
71
64
W>L>T
10
0
1
1
8
13
6
12
8
L>T>W
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
L>W>T
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
0
T>L>W
2
0
0
1
1
3
2
3
2
T>W> L
21
4
4
11
2
19
27
16
29
L, leisure; T, travel; W, work/household.
Figure 1
The mean total min/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by domain, across 104 countries, ordered by total MVPA. H=high-income, LM=lower-middle-income, UM=upper-middle-income, L=low-income according to the World Bank Classification 2020. Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Micronesia Fed. Sts. and Pakistan are subnational surveys. See online supplemental file 6 for the mean and median domain-specific min/week.
The mean total min/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by domain, across 104 countries, ordered by total MVPA. H=high-income, LM=lower-middle-income, UM=upper-middle-income, L=low-income according to the World Bank Classification 2020. Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Micronesia Fed. Sts. and Pakistan are subnational surveys. See online supplemental file 6 for the mean and median domain-specific min/week.Mean domain-specific min/week, relative contributions and rank order for the 104 countries, by income classification, sex and age groupL, leisure; T, travel; W, work/household.
Relative contributions of domain-specific activity to total MVPA
The 47 946 individuals who reported 0 min/week of total MVPA did not contribute to the relative analyses (denominator of zero; online supplemental file 5). Based on the remaining 279 843, the mean contribution of work/household MVPA to total MVPA was 52% (IQR 44%–63%); the respective means for travel and leisure were 36% (25%–45%) and 12% (4%–15%; table 2). Work/household domain was the largest contributor to total MVPA in 80 of the 104 countries, and 70 of these had travel as the second-largest contributor. Travel was the largest contributor in 23 countries, and leisure was dominant in only one.There was a tendency towards higher contributions of leisure MVPA in high-income countries (mean of 28% compared with 4%, 8%, and 13% in low, lower-middle, and upper-middle-income countries, respectively; table 2, figure 2, online supplementary files 7 and 8). The mean contributions of work/household MVPA in low and lower-middle-income countries were 57%, but were 44%–47% for upper-middle and high-income countries. The contribution of travel to total MVPA did not follow a clear pattern by World Bank income group.
Figure 2
Ternary plot of the relative contributions of work/household, travel and leisure moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) to total MVPA. Mean relative contributions should be read following the direction of the arrows for each axis. For example, in the USA, relative contributions are 52% from work/household, 11% from travel, 37% from leisure. Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Micronesia Fed. Sts. and Pakistan are subnational surveys.
Ternary plot of the relative contributions of work/household, travel and leisure moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) to total MVPA. Mean relative contributions should be read following the direction of the arrows for each axis. For example, in the USA, relative contributions are 52% from work/household, 11% from travel, 37% from leisure. Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Micronesia Fed. Sts. and Pakistan are subnational surveys.Doubling the duration of vigorous intensity activity (ie, 1 min of vigorous physical activity=2 min of moderate intensity physical activity) in the work/household and leisure domain obviously influenced the absolute durations but did not affect the relative contributions in a meaningful way. This was because those individuals reporting high levels of work/household vigorous intensity activity were already obtaining close to 100% of their MVPA in this domain and so further increases in the absolute durations did not shift the balance of the domain contributions. This conversion therefore had limited influence on the country-level mean relative contributions which varied by a maximum of 2 percentage points for all domains and the highest contributing domain only changed in five countries.There was a tendency towards greater travel and lower work/household contributions among women compared with men, judged by the means and rank ordering of the domains (table 2, figure 3, online supplementary file 9). Twenty-eight countries had a different ordering of the domain-specific contributions and 42 countries had at least one domain where the relative contributions differed by over 10 percentage points. Differences were more apparent in high-income and upper-middle-income countries.
Figure 3
Ternary plots of the relative contributions of work/household, travel and leisure moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) to total MVPA by sex and age group. Mean relative contributions should be read following the direction of the arrows for each axis. Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Micronesia Fed. Sts. and Pakistan are subnational surveys.
Ternary plots of the relative contributions of work/household, travel and leisure moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) to total MVPA by sex and age group. Mean relative contributions should be read following the direction of the arrows for each axis. Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Micronesia Fed. Sts. and Pakistan are subnational surveys.The variations between 25–44 and 45–64 year olds were not as pronounced as the sex differences. Only 15 countries had over10 percentage point difference in the relative contributions of a domain, and no clear pattern was apparent in terms of the domains in which these occurred (table 2, figure 3, online supplementary file 9). Twelve of these 15 countries were classified as upper-middle and high-income.
Exploratory analysis of domain-specific trends
We conducted exploratory analysis of trends using a subsample of data from four African countries (n=25 749), spanning the income classifications (figure 4). The results show considerable heterogeneity in the directions and magnitudes of the changes in domain-specific MVPA over time, even within income classifications.
Figure 4
An exploratory analysis of trends in the domain-specific moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in four African countries. World Bank Income 2020 classifications used.
An exploratory analysis of trends in the domain-specific moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in four African countries. World Bank Income 2020 classifications used.
Discussion
Main findings
This study is the largest comparison of country-level domain-specific physical activity to date, including 372 789 individuals from 104 countries. We found the work and household domain to be the highest contributor to total MVPA levels in three-quarters of countries. Travel was the second-largest contributor for all but one of the remaining countries, and was rarely the lowest contributor. There was a trend towards greater contributions of MVPA through work/household in lower income countries, and higher contributions of physical activity through leisure in high-income countries. This pattern was suspected but is shown quantitatively for the first time in a large sample of representative surveys across multiple regions. There were differences in the relative contributions of the domains by sex and age group within countries, with a tendency towards greater differences in upper-middle and high-income countries.
Comparison with previous results
Previous national-level domain-specific analyses have been focused on specific regions, for example, Africa,31 South America,16 Asia-Pacific,14 while other cross-national studies have investigated the proportions reporting a certain threshold of domain-specific activity (eg, 0, 10, 150 min/week) which limit comparisons with the present results.15 16 32 Our results extend the range of comparisons to be cross continental allowing greater comparisons between different World Bank income classifications, and show the relative importance of the domains in addition to the absolute values. Although high-income countries are relatively under-represented in our analyses, the 16 that are included act as helpful comparators to contrast the dominance of work/household-related activity and the low prevalence of leisure activity among many low and middle-income countries. Comparisons in total and domain-specific physical activity by country-level and individual-level income groups is an important yet under-researched area of global physical activity surveillance. However, it is clear that factors beyond income level and economic development, such as cultural and historical aspects, likely play a role in explaining differences between countries.Our exploratory analysis of changes over time within domains is an indicator of this complexity. Some but not all countries showed a decline in the work/household domain, a feature that was expected as the epidemiological transition is accompanied by a shift away from manual labour and increased access to labour-saving technology in the home.8 The variations seen in the work/household and travel domain trajectories is likely to be explained by differences in countries’ socioeconomic circumstances, level of urbanisation and rates of development. Urbanisation and uptake of digital technologies as well as other cultural, environmental and social factors influence the opportunities for increasing levels of participation in the different domains in different ways. These results indicate the importance of further research on this topic with a larger set of comparable data. It is also a reminder that while global comparisons can identify broad patterns, this needs to be coupled with a local understanding of the context in order to develop appropriate policies and interventions.Building on previous research that has shown lower levels of overall MVPA among women compared with men across the majority of countries worldwide,4 12 we showed that the domain composition also varies. The profile for women, at least in high-income and upper-middle-income countries, had a slightly higher contribution of travel and lower contribution of work/household. These results provide a more nuanced understanding of how physical activity varies by sex.We did not identify any notable differences in the relative contributions of the activity domains between 25–44 and 45–64 year olds, although where differences were found, they tended to be in upper-middle and high-income countries. Research from UK samples indicated that the greater shifts in domain-related contributions occur after 65 years, that is, around the age of retirement.17 18
Implications of the findings
These results can inform the development of interventions and policies aimed at increasing overall physical activity levels as called for by the 2018 Global Action Plan on Physical Activity.2 The high contribution of work/household activity for many low and middle-income countries is important for a number of reasons. First, it identifies a reliance on this domain for meeting activity recommendations that may not persist as countries develop economically.7 8 Policy action is necessary to ensure that alternative types of activity are available and affordable to those who might otherwise decrease their activity levels as consequence of such societal and economic changes. The travel domain is an obvious area of focus as our results show that it already is an important contributor to overall levels across all countries. Policies and infrastructure development that promote walking and cycling would also support efforts to reduce air pollution and carbon emissions to combat climate change as set out in the Sustainable Development Goals.33 Second, these data stress the importance of assessing all domains of physical activity, since solely concentrating on the leisure domain (as has often been the case34) would grossly misrepresent, and for many populations underestimate, overall physical activity prevalence.35 Third, if domain-specific activity were to show any differential health benefits, as recently debated,36 mapping absolute and relative profiles of domain-specific activity is critical for estimations of global disease burden.
Limitations
Methodological limitations include the unavailability of sampling weights for 13 countries and the necessity of using imputation methods to account for urban–rural variations when including subnational samples. Our aim was to be as inclusive as possible with the available data. Nonetheless, imputation likely increases the error regarding the representativeness of these estimates, over and above that of the national sampling. To maintain comparability between samples, we restricted the age range to 25–64 year olds. For these reasons, the descriptive statistics of overall activity and the proportions meeting the guidelines do not replace any official national statistics and are presented for context only. The novel estimates of the domain-specific relative contributions are valid in the context of this paper, but further work is necessary to generate official statistics that include adults of all ages, and the multitude of other national survey data collected using alternative questionnaires.The validity of domain-specific GPAQ estimates has not been evaluated against an appropriate criterion, such as a domain log.37 Some have raised concerns about the implausible work/household values.38 Inaccurate recall, social desirability and activity misclassification are possible sources of error. In lieu of such a validity study, the correlations presented between the work/household and travel domains and the selected country-level indicators provide tentative support for domain-specific analysis using GPAQ data. We believe the weaker results for the leisure domain are in part due to the number of countries with a median MVPA of zero min/week and the lack of specificity in the macro-economic indicators. In addition, the GPAQ states a minimum 10 min bout length, a requirement that is no longer included in the WHO physical activity guidelines.1 The inclusion of shorter bouts might alter the duration of reported activity across all domains, but it is difficult to predict which domains would be more affected as the magnitude of these increments is likely context specific. This would influence the relative contributions. Also, the GPAQ does not contain questions about light-intensity activity which is a major contributor to overall activity.39 It is likely that its inclusion would change the relative domain-specific results as well the absolute.Finally, in the relative contribution analysis, we presented the arithmetic mean values (of individuals for each country, and of countries within income classifications). Although the scaled geometric mean is often used in compositional data, this was not an option when so many individuals reported 0 min/week in at least one domain. However, our analysis method is somewhat protected against individuals reporting very high values of domain-specific activity as the relative contributions were calculated at an individual level, before being summarised at a country level. This means a high value in one domain is limited to a maximum of 100% relative contribution. Of course, this does not protect against issues of differential validity between the domains, which is a plausible concern as even the ordering of questions can affect reporting.40 In the GPAQ, the work/household domain is asked about first and all surveys used the same ordering. There is also the potential for cultural differences in the reporting as there are different interpretations of work/household, travel and leisure activity across populations. We were also unable to account for seasonal differences as surveys are often conducted within a short period of time that does not span all seasons.
Future directions
Filling in the data gaps will require wider adoption of the GPAQ in national surveys or harmonisation between different existing questionnaires. This would be pertinent for the European region as many countries have nationally representative data using alternative questionnaires. Nonetheless, it is rare in physical activity studies for the majority of data to be from low and middle-income countries and so this present work does provide an important perspective on the topic.Future work could extend these methods to investigate subnational regional differences that others have shown to exist.41 42 Exploring variation by socioeconomic differences would also have utility, and require suitable harmonisation of indicators of socioeconomic position across nations.We have also highlighted the need for analysis of trends in domain-specific data. As countries repeat their STEPS surveys, more comparable data will become available. In the meantime, efforts should be made to harmonise existing data.Lastly, although the present study reflects the optimal analysis of currently available data, the advent of combined location and physical activity sensors may allow objective assessment of domain-specific activity in future research.
Conclusion
This study is the largest analysis of domain-specific physical activity to date comparing data from 104 countries. Activity at work/household is the main contributor to total MVPA levels, particularly in lower income countries. Leisure activity was the smallest contributor but was highest in high-income countries. Achieving the 15% decrease in global levels of physical inactivity by 2030 as outlined in the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity,2 and agreed by 194 Member States of WHO43 will require detailed understanding of the context in which people accumulate their physical activity, especially for countries currently undergoing rapid economic development and urbanisation. Across all nations, policy actions will need to align efforts to support and enable opportunities to be active in different domains according to the social, economic and demographic changes, population needs and local context.Physical activity in the domains of work and household, travel and leisure vary broadly across countries in both their absolute levels and relative contributions to total moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).Work/household MVPA provided the largest contribution in 80 of the 104 countries included in this study.Women tended to have relatively less work/household and more travel MVPA.Differences between 25–44 and 45–64 year olds were less apparent than differences between the sexes, but were most evident in high and upper-middle-income countries.Clinicians and policy-makers alike should be aware that MVPA is accumulated across a variety of domains, and this varies across countries.Work/household is a dominant source of MVPA for many; this has implications for continuing to meet guidelines at the point of changing jobs or retirement.Women tended to have relatively lower contributions of work/household and more travel MVPA and this should be considered when tailoring behavioural advice.
Authors: Scott A Lear; Weihong Hu; Sumathy Rangarajan; Danijela Gasevic; Darryl Leong; Romaina Iqbal; Amparo Casanova; Sumathi Swaminathan; R M Anjana; Rajesh Kumar; Annika Rosengren; Li Wei; Wang Yang; Wang Chuangshi; Liu Huaxing; Sanjeev Nair; Rafael Diaz; Hany Swidon; Rajeev Gupta; Noushin Mohammadifard; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Aytekin Oguz; Katarzyna Zatonska; Pamela Seron; Alvaro Avezum; Paul Poirier; Koon Teo; Salim Yusuf Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Grégore I Mielke; Inacio Crochemore M da Silva; Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander; Wendy J Brown Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Fiona C Bull; Salih S Al-Ansari; Stuart Biddle; Katja Borodulin; Matthew P Buman; Greet Cardon; Catherine Carty; Jean-Philippe Chaput; Sebastien Chastin; Roger Chou; Paddy C Dempsey; Loretta DiPietro; Ulf Ekelund; Joseph Firth; Christine M Friedenreich; Leandro Garcia; Muthoni Gichu; Russell Jago; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Estelle Lambert; Michael Leitzmann; Karen Milton; Francisco B Ortega; Chathuranga Ranasinghe; Emmanuel Stamatakis; Anne Tiedemann; Richard P Troiano; Hidde P van der Ploeg; Vicky Wari; Juana F Willumsen Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Miriam Wanner; Christina Hartmann; Giulia Pestoni; Brian Winfried Martin; Michael Siegrist; Eva Martin-Diener Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2017-05-08
Authors: Esther M F van Sluijs; Ulf Ekelund; Inacio Crochemore-Silva; Regina Guthold; Amy Ha; David Lubans; Adewale L Oyeyemi; Ding Ding; Peter T Katzmarzyk Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ilaria Pina; Amy E Mendham; Simone A Tomaz; Julia H Goedecke; Lisa K Micklesfield; Naomi E Brooks; Iain J Gallagher; Rachel Crockett; Paul Dudchenko; Angus M Hunter Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Guillermo García Pérez de Sevilla; Olga Barceló Guido; María de la Paz De la Cruz; Ascensión Blanco Fernández; Lidia B Alejo; María Isabel Ramírez Goercke; Margarita Pérez-Ruiz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Emma R Lawlor; Ruth F Hunter; Deepti Adlakha; Frank Kee; Mark A Tully Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lambed Tatah; Clarisse Mapa-Tassou; Maylene Shung-King; Tolu Oni; James Woodcock; Amy Weimann; Nicole McCreedy; Trish Muzenda; Ishtar Govia; Jean Claude Mbanya; Felix Assah Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Dorothea Dumuid; Karel Hron; Nidhi Gupta; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen; Andreas Holtermann Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 3.295