Grégore I Mielke1,2, Inacio Crochemore M da Silva3,4, Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander5,6, Wendy J Brown5. 1. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. g.ivenmielke@uq.edu.au. 2. Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. g.ivenmielke@uq.edu.au. 3. Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. 4. International Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil. 5. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. 6. School of Health and Wellbeing, Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to (i) examine gender differences in physical inactivity in countries with different levels of Human Development Index (HDI); and (ii) assess whether small changes in the prevalence of inactivity in women could achieve the World Health Organization's (WHO) global inactivity target. METHODS: Data on inactivity were extracted for 142 countries for the year 2010 from the WHO Data Repository. Data for HDI were obtained for the year 2010 from the United Nations Development Program. Absolute and relative gender differences were calculated for countries according to four HDI categories. The potential effects of increasing women's activity levels on achievement of the WHO physical inactivity target were computed. RESULTS: Overall inactivity prevalence was higher in women (27%) than in men (20%). Women were more inactive than men in all except eight countries. Absolute gender differences [median 7.5% (range -10.1 to 33.2)] did not vary by HDI category, but there was a small negative correlation between relative gender difference in inactivity and HDI (rho -0.19; p = 0.02), which was mostly influenced by three outlier countries with low HDI. A decrease in inactivity levels of 4.8% points among women across the world would achieve the WHO target of reducing global levels of inactivity by 10%. CONCLUSION: Gender differences in the prevalence of physical inactivity were highly variable, both within and across categories of HDI. Interventions which result in small changes in inactivity prevalence in women would achieve the 2025 WHO global target for inactivity, without any change to the prevalence in men.
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to (i) examine gender differences in physical inactivity in countries with different levels of Human Development Index (HDI); and (ii) assess whether small changes in the prevalence of inactivity in women could achieve the World Health Organization's (WHO) global inactivity target. METHODS: Data on inactivity were extracted for 142 countries for the year 2010 from the WHO Data Repository. Data for HDI were obtained for the year 2010 from the United Nations Development Program. Absolute and relative gender differences were calculated for countries according to four HDI categories. The potential effects of increasing women's activity levels on achievement of the WHO physical inactivity target were computed. RESULTS: Overall inactivity prevalence was higher in women (27%) than in men (20%). Women were more inactive than men in all except eight countries. Absolute gender differences [median 7.5% (range -10.1 to 33.2)] did not vary by HDI category, but there was a small negative correlation between relative gender difference in inactivity and HDI (rho -0.19; p = 0.02), which was mostly influenced by three outlier countries with low HDI. A decrease in inactivity levels of 4.8% points among women across the world would achieve the WHO target of reducing global levels of inactivity by 10%. CONCLUSION: Gender differences in the prevalence of physical inactivity were highly variable, both within and across categories of HDI. Interventions which result in small changes in inactivity prevalence in women would achieve the 2025 WHO global target for inactivity, without any change to the prevalence in men.
Authors: Cora L Craig; Alison L Marshall; Michael Sjöström; Adrian E Bauman; Michael L Booth; Barbara E Ainsworth; Michael Pratt; Ulf Ekelund; Agneta Yngve; James F Sallis; Pekka Oja Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: I-Min Lee; Eric J Shiroma; Felipe Lobelo; Pekka Puska; Steven N Blair; Peter T Katzmarzyk Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James F Sallis; Fiona Bull; Regina Guthold; Gregory W Heath; Shigeru Inoue; Paul Kelly; Adewale L Oyeyemi; Lilian G Perez; Justin Richards; Pedro C Hallal Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jack Birch; Robert Petty; Lucie Hooper; Linda Bauld; Gillian Rosenberg; Jyotsna Vohra Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Jorge López Fernández; Alejandro López-Valenciano; Xián Mayo; Elizabeth Horton; Ivan Clavel; Gary Liguori; Alfonso Jiménez Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Leandro Fórnias Machado de Rezende; Leandro Martin Totaro Garcia; Grégore Iven Mielke; Dong Hoon Lee; Kana Wu; Edward Giovannucci; José Eluf-Neto Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 2.984