G F Del Duca1, M V Nahas2, L M T Garcia3, S G Silva4, P C Hallal4, M A Peres5. 1. Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil. Electronic address: gfdelduca@gmail.com. 2. Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil. 3. School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. 4. Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. 5. Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the consequences of including active commuting, compared with the leisure domain only, in the prevalence and sociodemographic factors associated with attending the physical activity recommendations, in Brazilian adults. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. METHOD: Adults between 20 and 59 years of age (n = 1720) were face-to-face interviewed from September 2009 to January 2010. Sociodemographic indicators and leisure-time and commuting physical activity were assessed by a validated questionnaire. Poisson regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: The prevalence of adherence to recommendations when only leisure-time physical activity was considered was 15.5% (95% CI: 13.6; 17.4) and was associated with men (PR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.25; 1.96), adults without a partner (PR: 1.38 95% CI: 1.05; 1.81) and higher educational level and income. The prevalence of adherence to physical activity recommendations after the combination of leisure-time and commuting was 29.1% (95% CI: 26.5; 31.6). Percentages differences in favor of men, white adults and those with higher educational level and income were no longer significant after the inclusion of active commuting. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of active commuting expands the percentage of adults who achieved the health-related physical activity recommendations and reduced important sociodemographic differences derived from the analysis of leisure-time physical activity alone. Public health strategies should consider the different domains of physical activity in the monitoring and promotion of a more active lifestyle.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the consequences of including active commuting, compared with the leisure domain only, in the prevalence and sociodemographic factors associated with attending the physical activity recommendations, in Brazilian adults. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. METHOD: Adults between 20 and 59 years of age (n = 1720) were face-to-face interviewed from September 2009 to January 2010. Sociodemographic indicators and leisure-time and commuting physical activity were assessed by a validated questionnaire. Poisson regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: The prevalence of adherence to recommendations when only leisure-time physical activity was considered was 15.5% (95% CI: 13.6; 17.4) and was associated with men (PR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.25; 1.96), adults without a partner (PR: 1.38 95% CI: 1.05; 1.81) and higher educational level and income. The prevalence of adherence to physical activity recommendations after the combination of leisure-time and commuting was 29.1% (95% CI: 26.5; 31.6). Percentages differences in favor of men, white adults and those with higher educational level and income were no longer significant after the inclusion of active commuting. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of active commuting expands the percentage of adults who achieved the health-related physical activity recommendations and reduced important sociodemographic differences derived from the analysis of leisure-time physical activity alone. Public health strategies should consider the different domains of physical activity in the monitoring and promotion of a more active lifestyle.
Authors: Patricia Gálvez-Fernández; Palma Chillón; María Jesús Aranda-Balboa; Manuel Herrador-Colmenero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390