| Literature DB >> 33238545 |
Gerard Bryan Gonzales1,2, Natasha Lelijveld3, Celine Bourdon4,5,6, Emmanuel Chimwezi7, Moffat J Nyirenda8, Jonathan C Wells9, Marko Kerac10, Robert H J Bandsma4,5,6.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the associations of targeted metabolomics and hormone profiles data with lean mass index (LMI), which were estimated using bioelectrical impedance, in survivors of child severe malnutrition (SM) (n = 69) and controls (n = 77) in Malawi 7 years after being treated. Linear associations between individual metabolite or hormone and LMI were determined, including their interaction with nutrition status 7 years prior. Path analysis was performed to determine structural associations. Lastly, predictive models for LMI were developed using the metabolome and hormone profile by elastic net regularized regression (EN). Metabolites including several lipids, amino acids, and hormones were individually associated (p < 0.05 after false discovery rate correction) with LMI. However, plasma FGF21 (Control: β = -0.02, p = 0.59; Case: β = -0.14, p < 0.001) and tryptophan (Control: β = 0.15, p = 0.26; Case: β = 0.70, p < 0.001) were associated with LMI among cases but not among controls (both interaction p-values < 0.01). Moreover, path analysis revealed that tryptophan mediates the association between child SM and LMI. EN revealed that most predictors of LMI differed between groups, further indicating altered metabolic mechanisms driving lean mass accretion among SM survivors later in life.Entities:
Keywords: DOHAD; bio-impedance; body composition; hormone; lean mass; non-communicable disease; severe malnutrition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33238545 PMCID: PMC7700560 DOI: 10.3390/nu12113593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Recruitment flow diagram.
Characteristics of study participants in this secondary metabolomics analysis.
| SM Survivors | Controls | Mean Difference ° |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 69 | 77 | ||
| Mean age in years (SD) * | 9.63 (1.63) | 9.95 (2.31) | −0.32 | 0.33 |
| 30 (43%) | 34 (44%) | 1 | ||
| <0.001 | ||||
| Negative | 44 (64%) | 46 (60%) | ||
| Positive | 20 (29%) | 4 (5%) | ||
| Unknown | 5 (7%) | 27 (35%) | ||
| Mean mid-upper arm circumference in cm (SD) * | 17.12 (1.64) | 18.15(2.30) | −1.03 | 0.002 |
| Mean height in cm (SD) * | 125.51 (8.90) | 129.57 (13.73) | −4.06 | 0.038 |
| Mean length-for-height z-score (SD) * | −1.68 (1.21) | −1.37 (1.00) | −0.31 | 0.090 |
| Mean weight-for-age z-score (SD) * | −1.44 (0.93) | −1.2 (0.88) | −0.24 | 0.210 |
| Mean body-mass index in kg/m2 (SD) * | 15.25 (1.33) | 15.77 (1.60) | −0.52 | 0.037 |
| Mean lean mass index in (1/Z) × 1000 (SD) * | 319.97 (75.36) | 378.87 (132.61) | −58.9 | 0.001 |
° SM survivors—controls, * calculated from the sample population of study.
Metabolites and hormones significantly associated with lean mass index.
| Feature | Partial Coefficient * | Partial r2 □ | R2 ▪ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| IGF1 | 0.125 | <0.001 | 0.271 | 0.667 | - |
| FGF21 | −0.054 | 0.027 | 0.069 | 0.574 | 0.007 |
|
| |||||
| AC C18 | −0.054 | 0.021 | 0.073 | 0.576 | - |
| AC C18:1 | −0.050 | 0.046 | 0.058 | 0.569 | - |
| PC ae C34:1 | −0.065 | 0.004 | 0.107 | 0.592 | - |
| PC aa C32:0 | −0.060 | 0.005 | 0.095 | 0.586 | - |
| PC aa C34:1 | −0.062 | 0.006 | 0.096 | 0.587 | - |
| PC aa C36:1 | −0.064 | 0.006 | 0.095 | 0.586 | - |
| PC aa C32:1 | −0.058 | 0.012 | 0.082 | 0.580 | - |
| PC ae C34:0 | −0.051 | 0.027 | 0.068 | 0.574 | - |
| PC ae C38:5 | −0.052 | 0.027 | 0.067 | 0.573 | - |
|
| |||||
| Tryptophan | 0.079 | <0.001 | 0.150 | 0.611 | 0.003 |
| Tyrosine | 0.057 | 0.012 | 0.082 | 0.580 | - |
| Citrulline | 0.052 | 0.040 | 0.061 | 0.571 | - |
|
| |||||
| Creatinine | 0.064 | 0.004 | 0.100 | 0.589 | - |
|
| |||||
| Kynurenine:Tryptophan | −0.07 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.590 | - |
| Sum of aromatic amino acids | 0.048 | 0.040 | 0.059 | 0.569 | - |
| Sum of lysine, threonine and tryptophan | 0.073 | 0.001 | 0.122 | 0.598 | 0.03 |
* Standardized regression coefficient adjusted for age, sex, and HIV status; positive values indicate a positive association while negative values indicate a negative association, □ Coefficient of partial determination, indicating the variation in lean mass index (LMI) that each metabolite or hormone explains independent of the other covariates (age, sex, HIV status, and early-life severe malnutrition), ▪ Coefficient of multiple determination (R2) of the full multivariate model including age, sex, HIV status, and early-life severe malnutrition as covariates, ° adjusted for false discovery rate (FDR), § interaction between feature and early childhood malnutrition status were tested and only further analyzed if the likelihood ratio test suggested an improved model fit (p < 0.05).
Figure 2FGF21 and tryptophan levels and their association with lean mass. Concentration differences in plasma FGF21 (a) and tryptophan (c) in survivors of childhood malnutrition (case) and sibling and community controls in the ChroSAM cohort. Association between lean mass index and FGF21 (b) and tryptophan (d) stratified by early childhood malnutrition status adjusted for age, sex, and HIV status. The associations between lean and tryptophan (p interaction = 0.003) and FGF21 (p interaction = 0.007) were significantly modified by early-life malnutrition. (e) Correlation between plasma FGF21 and tryptophan. No evidence of interaction between early malnutrition and the association between FGF21 and tryptophan was found (p = 0.63).
Figure 3Path analysis of the associations among early-life severe malnutrition (SM), lean mass index, plasma tryptophan and plasma FGF21. Goodness-of-fit indices: root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.06, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.99, Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.95. Full arrows are statistically significant (p < 0.05), broken arrow is not statistically significant. Values of arrow represent the association estimate β above and the p-value below. All paths are controlled for age, sex, and HIV status. Full statistical estimates can be found in Supplementary Table S2.
Figure 4Elastic net regularized regression model prediction of lean mass index. Independent variables included age, sex, HIV status, 155 plasma metabolite concentrations, and 22 hormones. Correlation between observed lean mass index and predicted lean mass index among control (a) and SM survivors (b). Training set included 80% of the observations and the remaining 20% was used for external validation. RMSEP = root mean squared error of prediction, the numbers in parentheses indicate the percentage of mean lean mass index. Bootstrap validation of the training set was performed using 1000 iterations. (c) Metabolite and hormone features selected by the elastic net model. Features in blue are positively associated with lean mass while features in red are negatively associated.