Literature DB >> 30911195

Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.

Dexin Shi1, Taehun Lee2, Alberto Maydeu-Olivares1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect the number of observed variables (p) has on three structural equation modeling indices: the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). The behaviors of the population fit indices and their sample estimates were compared under various conditions created by manipulating the number of observed variables, the types of model misspecification, the sample size, and the magnitude of factor loadings. The results showed that the effect of p on the population CFI and TLI depended on the type of specification error, whereas a higher p was associated with lower values of the population RMSEA regardless of the type of model misspecification. In finite samples, all three fit indices tended to yield estimates that suggested a worse fit than their population counterparts, which was more pronounced with a smaller sample size, higher p, and lower factor loading.

Keywords:  fit indices; model size effect; structural equation modeling (SEM)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30911195      PMCID: PMC6425088          DOI: 10.1177/0013164418783530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  13 in total

1.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.

Authors:  Roderick P McDonald; Moon-Ho Ringo Ho
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

2.  Abstract: Revisiting the Model Size Effect in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).

Authors:  Dexin Shi; Taehun Lee; Robert A Terry
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Authors:  H W Marsh; K T Hau; J R Balla; D Grayson
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  2001 Presidential Address: Working with Imperfect Models.

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.

Authors:  J H Steiger
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations.

Authors:  Dennis L Jackson; J Arthur Gillaspy; Rebecca Purc-Stephenson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-03

7.  Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Yubin Tian; Hirokazu Yanagihara
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.

Authors:  Moritz Heene; Sven Hilbert; Clemens Draxler; Matthias Ziegler; Markus Bühner
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-09

9.  The Impact of Partial Factorial Invariance on Cross-Group Comparisons.

Authors:  Dexin Shi; Hairong Song; Melanie D Lewis
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2017-06-09

10.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  52 in total

1.  Fitting Large Factor Analysis Models With Ordinal Data.

Authors:  Christine DiStefano; Heather L McDaniel; Liyun Zhang; Dexin Shi; Zhehan Jiang
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-12-29       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.

Authors:  Dexin Shi; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Fitting Ordinal Factor Analysis Models With Missing Data: A Comparison Between Pairwise Deletion and Multiple Imputation.

Authors:  Dexin Shi; Taehun Lee; Amanda J Fairchild; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Fitting Latent Growth Models with Small Sample Sizes and Non-normal Missing Data.

Authors:  Dexin Shi; Christine DiStefano; Xiaying Zheng; Ren Liu; Zhehan Jiang
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2021-01-07

5.  Dynamic fit index cutoffs for one-factor models.

Authors:  Daniel McNeish; Melissa G Wolf
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-18

6.  A Mixed Method Study of the Effects of Post-Migration Economic Stressors on the Mental Health of Recently Resettled Refugees.

Authors:  Jessica Goodkind; Julieta Ferrera; David Lardier; Julia Meredith Hess; R Neil Greene
Journal:  Soc Ment Health       Date:  2020-11-27

7.  Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Goran Pavlov; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Dexin Shi
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  It Matters: Reference Indicator Selection in Measurement Invariance Tests.

Authors:  Yutian T Thompson; Hairong Song; Dexin Shi; Zhengkui Liu
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.821

9.  Gender and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Social Determinants of Health and Subjective Cognitive Decline: The Mediating Role of Depression.

Authors:  Monique J Brown; Chantaezia Joseph; Titilayo James; Mohammad Rifat Haider; Whitney E Zahnd; Steven A Cohen
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.254

10.  Caregiver Psychological Distress Predicts Temperament and Social-Emotional Outcomes in Infants with Autism Traits.

Authors:  Lacey Chetcuti; Mirko Uljarević; Kandice J Varcin; Maryam Boutrus; Sarah Pillar; Stefanie Dimov; Josephine Barbaro; Cheryl Dissanayake; Jonathan Green; Ming Wai Wan; Leonie Segal; Vicky Slonims; Andrew J O Whitehouse; Kristelle Hudry
Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol       Date:  2021-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.