Literature DB >> 36036036

As Vertebral Body Tethering Impacts Missouri, New Technology Grows in the Right Direction.

Daniel G Hoernschemeyer1, Melanie E Boeyer2.   

Abstract

All eleven-year-old girls want to do is play and be active like every other child her age. Yet, the ability to have a normal childhood for one of our patients became a concern when she and her parents noticed an abnormal lateral curvature in her spine, which was later diagnosed as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In February 2014, she presented with a 45° thoracic deformity with a high risk of progression. At that time, the gold standard for the treatment of her deformity was a posterior spinal fusion - a surgical treatment she nor her parents were interested in pursuing. After their initial appointment, her parents scoured the internet and discovered a new non-fusion surgical technique, known as vertebral body tethering, that might correct their daughter's deformity without the need for titanium rods in her spine. In April 2014, that same eleven-year-old girl underwent vertebral body tethering of her main thoracic deformity from T5 to L1 under the care and management of Dr. Daniel Hoernschemeyer, a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon, with the University of Missouri's Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Today, she is a healthy young adult who is thinking more about prom than about her scoliosis. Copyright 2022 by the Missouri State Medical Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36036036      PMCID: PMC9339387     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mo Med        ISSN: 0026-6620


  16 in total

1.  Growth modulation by means of anterior tethering resulting in progressive correction of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: a case report.

Authors:  Charles H Crawford; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Equivalent in Patients Who Receive Vertebral Body Tethering Versus Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Catherine Qiu; Divya Talwar; James Gordon; Anthony Capraro; Carina Lott; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 3.  Long-term outcomes after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Christopher K Kepler; Dennis S Meredith; Daniel W Green; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.856

4.  Return to athletic activity after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: analysis of independent predictors.

Authors:  Peter D Fabricant; Sha-har Admoni; Daniel W Green; Lisa S Ipp; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2012 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering for Adolescent Scoliosis with Growth Remaining: A Retrospective Review of 2 to 5-Year Postoperative Results.

Authors:  Daniel G Hoernschemeyer; Melanie E Boeyer; Madeline E Robertson; Christopher M Loftis; John R Worley; Nicole M Tweedy; Sumit U Gupta; Dana L Duren; Christina M Holzhauser; Venkataraman M Ramachandran
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A preliminary assessment of intervertebral disc health and pathoanatomy changes observed two years following anterior vertebral body tethering.

Authors:  Daniel G Hoernschemeyer; Melanie E Boeyer; Nicole M Tweedy; John R Worley; Julia R Crim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Anterior Spinal Growth Tethering for Skeletally Immature Patients with Scoliosis: A Retrospective Look Two to Four Years Postoperatively.

Authors:  Peter O Newton; Dylan G Kluck; Wataru Saito; Burt Yaszay; Carrie E Bartley; Tracey P Bastrom
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Prospective Follow-up Report on Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering for Idiopathic Scoliosis: Interim Results from an FDA IDE Study.

Authors:  Amer F Samdani; Joshua M Pahys; Robert J Ames; Harsh Grewal; Glenn J Pelletier; Steven W Hwang; Randal R Betz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Does vertebral body tethering cause disc and facet joint degeneration? A preliminary MRI study with minimum two years follow-up.

Authors:  Altug Yucekul; Burcu Akpunarli; Atahan Durbas; Tais Zulemyan; Irem Havlucu; Gokhan Ergene; Sahin Senay; Pinar Yalinay Dikmen; Sule Turgut Balci; Ercan Karaarslan; Yasemin Yavuz; Caglar Yilgor; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Return to sport and daily life activities after vertebral body tethering for AIS: analysis of the sport activity questionnaire.

Authors:  Alice Baroncini; Per David Trobisch; Angelika Berrer; Philipp Kobbe; Markus Tingart; Jörg Eschweiler; Stephanie Da Paz; Filippo Migliorini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.