Madeline M Cook1, Luai Al Rabadi2, Andy J Kaempf3, Megan M Saraceni4, Michael A Savin2, Zahi I Mitri2. 1. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. 2. Department of Hematology Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA. 3. Knight Cancer Institute Biostatistics Shared Resource, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. 4. Department of Pharmacy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The combination of everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (mHRBC) who progress on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy. However, none of the patients enrolled in the trial that led to this approval (BOLERO-2) had previously received CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is), which have since become a frontline standard of care for mHRBC. As such, the clinical benefit of EVE plus EXE in patients who have previously received CDK4/6is remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with mHRBC at our institution who progressed on an NSAI plus CDK4/6i or NSAI therapy alone and were treated with at least one cycle of EVE plus EXE between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. Collected data included patient demographics, treatment history, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. Primary objectives were to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received prior NSAI plus CDK4/6i therapy versus an NSAI alone. RESULTS: Among 43 patients, 17 had prior CDK4/6i exposure. With the exception of de novo metastatic disease, patient and disease characteristics were comparable across treatment cohorts. There was no significant difference in PFS (median, 3.6 vs. 4.2 months) or OS (median, 15.6 vs. 11.3 months) between patients who had received prior CDK4/6is and those who had not, respectively. CONCLUSION: Prior exposure to CDK4/6i therapy did not impact survival outcomes for patients with mHRBC taking EVE plus EXE. However, there was a trend toward improved OS in the CDK4/6i cohort that should be evaluated in larger cohorts. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor has become a standard frontline therapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. An approved subsequent line of therapy is everolimus plus exemestane; however, the original data supporting this therapy predated approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors. As such, the clinical benefit of everolimus and exemestane in patients previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor was unknown. This retrospective cohort study offers real-world data demonstrating prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure does not impact survival outcomes for everolimus plus exemestane.
BACKGROUND: The combination of everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (mHRBC) who progress on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy. However, none of the patients enrolled in the trial that led to this approval (BOLERO-2) had previously received CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is), which have since become a frontline standard of care for mHRBC. As such, the clinical benefit of EVE plus EXE in patients who have previously received CDK4/6is remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with mHRBC at our institution who progressed on an NSAI plus CDK4/6i or NSAI therapy alone and were treated with at least one cycle of EVE plus EXE between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. Collected data included patient demographics, treatment history, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. Primary objectives were to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received prior NSAI plus CDK4/6i therapy versus an NSAI alone. RESULTS: Among 43 patients, 17 had prior CDK4/6i exposure. With the exception of de novo metastatic disease, patient and disease characteristics were comparable across treatment cohorts. There was no significant difference in PFS (median, 3.6 vs. 4.2 months) or OS (median, 15.6 vs. 11.3 months) between patients who had received prior CDK4/6is and those who had not, respectively. CONCLUSION: Prior exposure to CDK4/6i therapy did not impact survival outcomes for patients with mHRBC taking EVE plus EXE. However, there was a trend toward improved OS in the CDK4/6i cohort that should be evaluated in larger cohorts. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor has become a standard frontline therapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. An approved subsequent line of therapy is everolimus plus exemestane; however, the original data supporting this therapy predated approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors. As such, the clinical benefit of everolimus and exemestane in patients previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor was unknown. This retrospective cohort study offers real-world data demonstrating prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure does not impact survival outcomes for everolimus plus exemestane.
Authors: José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hope S Rugo; Lasika Seneviratne; J Thaddeus Beck; John A Glaspy; Julio A Peguero; Timothy J Pluard; Navneet Dhillon; Leon Christopher Hwang; Chaitali Nangia; Ingrid A Mayer; Timothy F Meiller; Mark S Chambers; Robert W Sweetman; J Randy Sabo; Jennifer K Litton Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: M Piccart; G N Hortobagyi; M Campone; K I Pritchard; F Lebrun; Y Ito; S Noguchi; A Perez; H S Rugo; I Deleu; H A Burris; L Provencher; P Neven; M Gnant; M Shtivelband; C Wu; J Fan; W Feng; T Taran; J Baselga Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Richard S Finn; Miguel Martin; Hope S Rugo; Stephen Jones; Seock-Ah Im; Karen Gelmon; Nadia Harbeck; Oleg N Lipatov; Janice M Walshe; Stacy Moulder; Eric Gauthier; Dongrui R Lu; Sophia Randolph; Véronique Diéras; Dennis J Slamon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew P Goetz; Masakazu Toi; Mario Campone; Joohyuk Sohn; Shani Paluch-Shimon; Jens Huober; In Hae Park; Olivier Trédan; Shin-Cheh Chen; Luis Manso; Orit C Freedman; Georgina Garnica Jaliffe; Tammy Forrester; Martin Frenzel; Susana Barriga; Ian C Smith; Nawel Bourayou; Angelo Di Leo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Salomon M Stemmer; Howard A Burris; Yoon-Sim Yap; Gabe S Sonke; Shani Paluch-Shimon; Mario Campone; Kimberly L Blackwell; Fabrice André; Eric P Winer; Wolfgang Janni; Sunil Verma; Pierfranco Conte; Carlos L Arteaga; David A Cameron; Katarina Petrakova; Lowell L Hart; Cristian Villanueva; Arlene Chan; Erik Jakobsen; Arnd Nusch; Olga Burdaeva; Eva-Maria Grischke; Emilio Alba; Erik Wist; Norbert Marschner; Anne M Favret; Denise Yardley; Thomas Bachelot; Ling-Ming Tseng; Sibel Blau; Fengjuan Xuan; Farida Souami; Michelle Miller; Caroline Germa; Samit Hirawat; Joyce O'Shaughnessy Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Grace M Choong; Savannah Liddell; Roberto A Leon Ferre; Ciara C O'Sullivan; Kathryn J Ruddy; Tufia C Haddad; Timothy J Hobday; Prema P Peethambaram; Minetta C Liu; Matthew P Goetz; Karthik V Giridhar Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 4.624
Authors: Hyehyun Jeong; Jae Ho Jeong; Jeong Eun Kim; Jin-Hee Ahn; Kyung Hae Jung; Sung-Bae Kim Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 5.036