Literature DB >> 28968163

MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer.

Matthew P Goetz1, Masakazu Toi1, Mario Campone1, Joohyuk Sohn1, Shani Paluch-Shimon1, Jens Huober1, In Hae Park1, Olivier Trédan1, Shin-Cheh Chen1, Luis Manso1, Orit C Freedman1, Georgina Garnica Jaliffe1, Tammy Forrester1, Martin Frenzel1, Susana Barriga1, Ian C Smith1, Nawel Bourayou1, Angelo Di Leo1.   

Abstract

Purpose Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant in women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy. Methods MONARCH 3 is a double-blind, randomized phase III study of abemaciclib or placebo plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in 493 postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. Patients received abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily continuous schedule) plus either 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole, daily. The primary objective was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary objectives included response evaluation and safety. A planned interim analysis occurred after 189 events. Results Median progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the abemaciclib arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.72; P = .000021; median: not reached in the abemaciclib arm, 14.7 months in the placebo arm). In patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 59% in the abemaciclib arm and 44% in the placebo arm ( P = .004). In the abemaciclib arm, diarrhea was the most frequent adverse effect (81.3%) but was mainly grade 1 (44.6%). Comparing abemaciclib and placebo, the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (21.1% v 1.2%), diarrhea (9.5% v 1.2%), and leukopenia (7.6% v 0.6%). Conclusion Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor was effective as initial therapy, significantly improving progression-free survival and objective response rate and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28968163     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  336 in total

1.  An oncoinformatics study to predict the inhibitory potential of recent FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs against human Polo-like kinase 1 enzyme: a step towards dual-target cancer medication.

Authors:  Syed Mohd Danish Rizvi; Abdulaziz Arif A Alshammari; Waleed Abdullah Almawkaa; Abo Bakr F Ahmed; Ahmed Katamesh; Ahmed Alafnan; Tariq J Almutairi; Rakan F Alshammari
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Targeting forkhead box M1 transcription factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ruth M O'Regan; Rita Nahta
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 3.  The Role of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Conleth G Murphy
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-18

4.  Cyclin E mRNA: Assessing Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) Activation State to Elucidate Breast Cancer Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Sarat Chandarlapaty; Pedram Razavi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Endocrine therapy for breast cancer in the primary care setting.

Authors:  A Awan; K Esfahani
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Strategies for Early Prediction and Timely Recognition of Drug-Induced Liver Injury: The Case of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Fabrizio De Ponti
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  Mechanisms of resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors.

Authors:  Georgia Gomatou; Ioannis Trontzas; Stephanie Ioannou; Maria Drizou; Nikolaos Syrigos; Elias Kotteas
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Comparative Efficacy of CDK4/6 Inhibitors Plus Aromatase Inhibitors Versus Fulvestrant for the First-Line Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qianqian Guo; Xiaojie Lin; Lingling Ye; Rui Xu; Yan Dai; Yuzhu Zhang; Qianjun Chen
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 9.  Maintenance Therapy in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A New Approach for an Old Concept.

Authors:  Eva Ciruelos; José Manuel Pérez-García; Joaquín Gavilá; Analía Rodríguez; Juan de la Haba-Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 10.  An Update on the Clinical Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Marie Robert; Jean-Sébastien Frenel; Emmanuelle Bourbouloux; Dominique Berton Rigaud; Anne Patsouris; Paule Augereau; Carole Gourmelon; Mario Campone
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.