Literature DB >> 33229670

Variations in the central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle in Indian women.

Deepak Mishra1, Prashant Bhushan1, Shikha Sachan2, M K Singh1, Chaitra Jayadev3, Pallak Kusumgar4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the changes in central corneal thickness (CCT) during the menstrual cycle in Indian women.
METHODS: A prospective observational clinical study at a tertiary care center between December 2015 and December 2018. One hundred and twenty sixty women between 18 and 45 years were included. The CCT was measured using an ultrasound pachymeter at three specific timelines of the menstrual cycle: at the beginning (1st to 3rd day), during ovulation time (14th to 16th day), and at the end of the cycle (28th to 33rd day). Phases of the cycle were confirmed by the urine luteinizing hormone level.
RESULTS: The mean CCT of both eyes was 541.76 ± 4.21 μm, 559.21 ± 4.50 μm, and 544.52 ± 8.06 μm at the beginning, mid, and end of cycle, respectively. The mean CCT of the right eye was 541.68 ± 4.15 μm, 559.08 ± 4.50 μm, and 544.44 ± 8.06 μm and of the left eye was 541.84 ± 4.27 μm, 559.35 ± 4.50 μm, and 544.61 ± 8.06 μm at the beginning, mid, and end of cycle, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The CCT value was significantly (P < 0.001) higher during ovulation compared to the beginning and end of the menstrual cycle. Our study recommends adding menstrual history in the workup of women undergoing refractive surgery as physiological variations in the CCT may result in unexpected surgical outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central corneal thickness; LH surge; menstrual cycle; refractive surgery; ultrasound pachymeter

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33229670      PMCID: PMC7856978          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1207_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


Refractive procedures have evolved over the years, from radial keratotomy to the modern-day laser-assisted surgeries. The corneal thickness is an important consideration for these surgeries.[1] In women, fluctuating hormone levels due to menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause can influence the corneal thickness.[2] The menstrual cycle and its effects have been a subject of discussion for many researchers. Varying women hormone levels cause various cyclical changes in the reproductive system, the most significant of which are ovulation and endometrial changes. With time and research, it has been elucidated that these hormones have receptors beyond the reproductive system, influencing different tissues, organs, and biochemical processes.[3] Gonadal hormone receptors have been observed in human ocular tissues such as the cornea, iris, ciliary body, lens, conjunctiva, and lacrimal and meibomian glands.[4] Physiological changes in the hormone milieu, oral contraceptive use, or hormonal replacement therapy[5] can influence the management of glaucoma[6] and dry eyes[7] and are important in contact lens users as well.[8] Noninvasive methods to monitor these physiological events such as identifying the time of ovulation include basal body temperature monitoring[9] and urinary luteinizing hormone (LH) levels.[10] In a multicentric trial, Leiva et al. found that the urinary LH values of 25–30 IU/L was the best predictive values for ovulation within 24 h.[11] Previous studies have shown that these hormones can increase the central corneal thickness (CCT) by 5.6% on days 15 and 16,[12] increase in the intraocular pressure (IOP) during the menstrual phase,[13] and influence tear film production and stability during the menstrual cycle.[14] Along with corneal topography and tomography, the CCT or pachymetry is an important consideration for planning the ablation zone in refractive surgery. A literature review on PubMed did not reveal any studies in the Indian population on the variations in CCT during the menstrual cycle, which, therefore, is the aim of our study.

Methods

This is a prospective, observational study done at a tertiary care center in north India between December 2015 and December 2018. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee and complied with the Tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Of the 735 women who were screened, 163 subjects fulfilled the study criteria, but 37 of them refused to participate. A total of 126 patients were included in the study after taking an informed consent. Inclusion criteria were women between 18 and 45 years of age with normal menstrual cycles. For the purpose of this study, a normal menstrual cycle was defined as that lasting between 21 and 35 days, with 2–6 days of flow. There were both ocular and gynecological exclusion criteria. Those with a previous history of eye surgery, conditions that can affect the CCT such as keratoconus, prolonged topical medications, scarred corneas, infectious corneal diseases, dry eye, and contact lens users were excluded. In addition, women with a history of infertility, polycystic ovarian diseases, pelvic inflammatory diseases, current use of contraceptives, breastfeeding mothers, and diabetic patients were excluded. Self-reported dates of the menstrual cycle by the participants were noted, but the ovulation time was confirmed by the urine LH level. A complete ocular examination, including slit-lamp examination and fundus examination, was done to rule out any ocular abnormality. The CCT was measured by an ultrasound pachymeter (Tomey SP-300 Pachymeter) by a single experienced investigator under topical anesthesia. An average of three readings was taken at the beginning (1st to 3rd day), during ovulation time (14th to 16th day), and at the end of the cycle (last three days). All measurements were taken between 8 am and 10 am to avoid the possibility of diurnal fluctuation. The paired t-test was used to compare the CCT between the different phases of the cycle. The independent-samples t-test was utilized to compare parameters between the right and left eye of each patient. Intergroup variation was studied by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The data was analyzed by SPSS Version 20.0 (IBM Corp, Chicago, USA).

Results

Out of the 126 subjects, in 19 subjects, the CCT measurements for all three-time points in the cycle were unavailable. Hence, readings of 105 women were taken for the analysis. The mean age of the participants was 26.6 + 2.6 years (range: 18–45 years). The mean duration of the cycle was 27.9 + 2.9 days (range: 24–34 days). The mean CCT of both eyes was 541.76 ± 4.21 μm, 559.21 ± 4.50 μm, and 544.52 ± 8.06 μm at the beginning, during ovulation, and end of cycle, respectively. The CCT values were significantly (P < 0.001) higher during ovulation compared to the beginning and end of the menstrual cycle. The CCT at the end of the cycle was significantly higher compared to the beginning of cycle (P < 0.002). Results of the paired t-test applied on the change in mean CCT during different phases are described in Table 1.
Table 1

Comparison of the mean central corneal thickness (CCT) of the right and left eye (in μm) during the different phases

EyeComparison of different phases of measurements of CCTMeans of paired differences of CCTPaired t-testDegree of freedom (df)P
LeftBetween beginning and middle−17.4028.3097<0.001
Between middle and end14.6415.4497<0.001
Between beginning and end−2.763.2197<0.002
RightBetween beginning and middle−17.5128.3697<0.001
Between middle and end14.6915.5397<0.001
Between beginning and end−2.813.2097<0.002
OverallBetween beginning and middle−17.4540.17194<0.001
Between middle and end14.6721.96194<0.001
Between beginning and end−2.784.54194<0.002
Comparison of the mean central corneal thickness (CCT) of the right and left eye (in μm) during the different phases The mean CCT of the right eye was 541.68 ± 4.15 μm, 559.08 ± 4.50 μm, and 544.44 ± 8.06 μm and of the left eye was 541.84 ± 4.27 μm, 559.35 ± 4.50 μm, and 544.61 ± 8.06 μm at the beginning, mid, and end of cycle, respectively. The unpaired t-test showed no difference between the mean CCT values in any phase of the menstrual cycle [Table 2]. The mean CCT in all phases was 548.40 ± 9.61 and 548.61 ± 9.66 μm in the right and left eyes, respectively. In 97 women (92%), CCT changes were seen, while in seven, there was no difference between any phases of the cycle.
Table 2

Mean central corneal thickness of the right and left eye (in μm) during the different phases and the entire menstrual cycle

Phases of the menstrual cycleEyetP

Right (n=97)Left (n=97)
Beginning541.68±4.15541.84±4.270.260.796
Middle559.08±4.50559.35±4.500.400.688
End544.44±8.06544.65±8.060.180.857
Entire cycle548.40±9.61548.61±9.660.260.794
Mean central corneal thickness of the right and left eye (in μm) during the different phases and the entire menstrual cycle

Discussion

The effect of the menstrual cycle and fluctuating levels of hormones on the eye are multifold. They can affect the corneal hydration and tear film and thence, the corneal thickness.[15] It is also associated with variations in the corneal biomechanics.[16] In addition, the pituitary gland is hyperactive during ovulation leading to a higher secretion of antidiuretic hormone. This can increase the IOP and cause hydration of the cornea, thereby increasing the CCT.[17] Such variations may be important in potential candidates for refractive surgery, and also influence the IOP measurements and contact lens compliance. In our study, the cornea was thickest at mid cycle followed by the end and beginning of the cycle. Feldman et al. and Soni reported the lowest CCT just before ovulation and maximum at the beginning of the cycle.[1618] Giuffre et al. reported that the cornea was thickest at the end of the cycle and thinnest at the beginning.[19] Kiely et al. studied a group of six women and reported that the cornea was thickest at the time of ovulation.[20] Ghahfarokhi et al. found that the cornea was thickest during ovulation time and the thinnest at the end of the cycle.[21] In another study, the CCT and biomechanical parameters significantly varied throughout the menstrual cycle.[22] Studies on the variation of the CCT during the menstrual cycle are fraught with inconsistent results and findings. Reasons include the number of participants, use of different types of pachymeters, and subjective methods to determine the time of ovulation. We used an ultrasonic pachymeter for CCT measurement and urine LH levels for the confirmation of ovulation time. This allowed for a more accurate comparison between different subjects and correlation with the menstrual cycle.

Conclusion

Based on our findings of the CCT being significantly higher during ovulation, menstrual history seems to be an important consideration during refractive surgery workup, for contact lens fitting and glaucoma evaluation in women. One limitation of our study is that the stages of the menstrual cycle and follicular maturation were not verified by an abdominal ultrasound since we relied on the history and urine LH levels. Since the LH levels during all the phases of the menstrual cycle were not measured, a correlation between CCT and LH levels was not possible. Studies with a larger number of subjects taking into consideration the above factors may further confirm our findings.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  21 in total

1.  The effects of long-term contact lens wear on corneal thickness, curvature, and surface regularity.

Authors:  Z Liu; S C Pflugfelder
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Variations in central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle in women.

Authors:  Giuseppe Giuffrè; Luigi Di Rosa; Fabio Fiorino; Daniele Morreale Bubella; Gaetano Lodato
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Physiological changes associated with the menstrual cycle: a review.

Authors:  Miranda A Farage; Sallie Neill; Allan B MacLean
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.347

4.  Development of the first urinary reproductive hormone ranges referenced to independently determined ovulation day.

Authors:  Sarah Johnson; Sarah Weddell; Sonya Godbert; Guenter Freundl; Judith Roos; Christian Gnoth
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Variation in intraocular pressure during the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  V Misra; P Awasthi; B Sarkar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Corneal hydration changes during the normal menstrual cycle--a preliminary study.

Authors:  N E Leach; N E Wallis; L L Lothringer; J A Olson
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Variations of lacrimal fluid peroxidase activity in female and male rats.

Authors:  F Madia; V Liberati; G de Feo; G Marcozzi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Oestrogen-induced changes in biomechanics in the cornea as a possible reason for keratectasia.

Authors:  Eberhard Spoerl; Viktoria Zubaty; Frederik Raiskup-Wolf; Lutz E Pillunat
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Ocular surface changes over the menstrual cycle in women with and without dry eye.

Authors:  Piera Versura; Michela Fresina; Emilio C Campos
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Evaluation of corneal thickness alterations during menstrual cycle in productive age women.

Authors:  Negar Amiri Ghahfarokhi; Ali Vaseghi; Negin Amiri Ghahfarokhi; Mohammad Ghoreishi; Alireza Peyman; Alireza Dehghani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Sex Hormones, Growth Hormone, and the Cornea.

Authors:  Tina B McKay; Shrestha Priyadarsini; Dimitrios Karamichos
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.600

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.