Literature DB >> 33227385

Individual differences and moderating participant characteristics in the effect of reducing portion size on meal energy intake: Pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials.

Eric Robinson1, Ashleigh Haynes2.   

Abstract

Portion size impacts on the amount of energy consumed during a meal. However, research findings on participant characteristics that moderate the effect of portion size on energy intake are mixed. Using data pooled across three randomized control trials, we examined the impact of reducing meal portion size on meal energy intake in 111 adult participants varying in sex (55 M, 56 F), body weight (BMI range = 19-42) and a broad range of participant characteristics, including usual portion size, restrained, emotional and external eating, satiety responsiveness, plate clearing tendencies, concerns about wasting food and self-control. In each trial, a repeated-measures design was used and participants consumed three ad-libitum lunchtime meals differing in portion size; large-normal portion size condition (100%) vs. small-normal portion size condition (~ 75%) vs. smaller than normal portion size condition (~ 50%). In mixed ANOVAs, we did not find convincing evidence that any participant characteristic reliably moderated the impact that reducing portion size had on energy intake. For the majority of participants energy intake decreased when portion size was reduced and it was more common for participants to consistently reduce their energy intake than consume a similar amount when portion size was reduced. We also found little evidence that a sub-group of participants existed whose energy intake was consistently resistant to portion size reductions. Portion size may be a universal driver of energy intake, as reducing meal portion size appears to decrease meal energy intake among most people. Food portion downsizing may therefore be an equitable intervention approach to reducing population level energy intake.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eating behaviour; Energy intake; Individual differences; Portion size

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33227385      PMCID: PMC7816161          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  32 in total

1.  High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.

Authors:  June P Tangney; Roy F Baumeister; Angie Luzio Boone
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2004-04

2.  Portion size and intended consumption. Evidence for a pre-consumption portion size effect in males?

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Wesselien te Raa; Charlotte A Hardman
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  The effect of food type on the portion size effect in children aged 2-12 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Reale; J Hamilton; R Akparibo; M M Hetherington; J E Cecil; S J Caton
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Mechanisms behind the portion size effect: visibility and bite size.

Authors:  Kyle S Burger; Jennifer O Fisher; Susan L Johnson
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 5.  Control of food intake in the obese.

Authors:  J E Blundell; A Gillett
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-11

6.  The effect of large portion sizes on energy intake is sustained for 11 days.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls; Liane S Roe; Jennifer S Meengs
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Portion size and later food intake: evidence on the "normalizing" effect of reducing food portion sizes.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Inge Kersbergen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Emotional Eating Is Not What You Think It Is and Emotional Eating Scales Do Not Measure What You Think They Measure.

Authors:  Peggy Bongers; Anita Jansen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-08

9.  Socioeconomic position and the impact of increasing availability of lower energy meals vs. menu energy labelling on food choice: two randomized controlled trials in a virtual fast-food restaurant.

Authors:  Lucile Marty; Andrew Jones; Eric Robinson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Portion size effects on weight gain in a free living setting.

Authors:  Simone A French; Nathan R Mitchell; Julian Wolfson; Lisa J Harnack; Robert W Jeffery; Anne F Gerlach; John E Blundell; Paul R Pentel
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Front-of-pack (FOP) labelling systems to improve the quality of nutrition information to prevent obesity: NutrInform Battery vs Nutri-Score.

Authors:  Michele O Carruba; Antonio Caretto; Antonino De Lorenzo; Giuseppe Fatati; Andrea Ghiselli; Lucio Lucchin; Claudio Maffeis; Alexis Malavazos; Giuseppe Malfi; Enrica Riva; Chiara Ruocco; Ferruccio Santini; Marco Silano; Alessandra Valerio; Andrea Vania; Enzo Nisoli
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.008

Review 2.  Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  M Angeles Vargas-Alvarez; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Luigi Palla; J Alfredo Martínez; Eva Almiron-Roig
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.