Literature DB >> 20948520

Mechanisms behind the portion size effect: visibility and bite size.

Kyle S Burger1, Jennifer O Fisher, Susan L Johnson.   

Abstract

Increases in portion size lead to increases in energy intake, yet the mechanisms behind this "portion size effect" are unclear. This study tested possible mechanisms of the portion size effect, i.e., bite size and visual cues. A 2 × 2 repeated measures, within-subject design was used to test the effects of portion size (410 g vs. 820 g of a pasta dish) and visual cues (blindfolded vs. visible) on energy intake in 30 individuals (15 men, 15 women). At each meal participants were exposed to one of four experimental conditions (small portion/visible; small portion/blindfold; large portion/visible; large portion/blindfold). Participant characteristics, food intake, number of bites, meal duration, palatability measures and hunger and fullness were assessed. In response to a doubling of the portion presented, entrée energy intake increased 26% (220 kcal; P < 0.001) and mean bite size increased 2.4 g/bite (P < 0.05). Overweight (OW) individuals consumed 40% (334 kcal) more of the entrée in response to the large portion condition (P < 0.05), while lean individuals' intakes did not differ (P < 0.56). A 12% (122 kcal) decrease in entrée intake was observed in the blindfolded condition (P < 0.01), but no portion by visual cue interaction was found; indicating that blindfolding did not significantly attenuate the portion size effect. These data suggest that the portion size effect is not impacted by removing the visual cue of food and that this effect occurs via changes in bite size in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20948520     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2010.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  23 in total

1.  Effects of food diameter on bite size per mouthful and chewing behavior.

Authors:  Kouichi Shiozawa; Yoshiki Ohnuki; Yasumasa Mototani; Daisuke Umeki; Aiko Ito; Yasutake Saeki; Nobuhiro Hanada; Satoshi Okumura
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Perceived 'healthiness' of foods can influence consumers' estimations of energy density and appropriate portion size.

Authors:  G P Faulkner; L K Pourshahidi; J M W Wallace; M A Kerr; T A McCaffrey; M B E Livingstone
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 3.  Potential moderators of the portion size effect.

Authors:  Faris M Zuraikat; Alissa D Smethers; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  Food portion size and energy density evoke different patterns of brain activation in children.

Authors:  Laural K English; S Nicole Fearnbach; Stephen J Wilson; Jennifer O Fisher; Jennifer S Savage; Barbara J Rolls; Kathleen L Keller
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Increasing the size of portion options affects intake but not portion selection at a meal.

Authors:  Faris M Zuraikat; Liane S Roe; Gregory J Privitera; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Brain regions implicated in inhibitory control and appetite regulation are activated in response to food portion size and energy density in children.

Authors:  L K English; S N Fearnbach; M Lasschuijt; A Schlegel; K Anderson; S Harris; S J Wilson; J O Fisher; J S Savage; B J Rolls; K L Keller
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  A comparison of bite size and BMI in a cafeteria setting.

Authors:  Ryan S Mattfeld; Eric R Muth; Adam Hoover
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-09-08

8.  Portion sizes for children are predicted by parental characteristics and the amounts parents serve themselves.

Authors:  Susan L Johnson; Sheryl O Hughes; Xiangqin Cui; Xuelin Li; David B Allison; Yan Liu; L Suzanne Goodell; Theresa Nicklas; Thomas G Power; Kirstin Vollrath
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Consumption with large sip sizes increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed.

Authors:  Dieuwerke P Bolhuis; Catriona M M Lakemond; Rene A de Wijk; Pieternel A Luning; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.