Literature DB >> 33226709

Evaluation of cine imaging during multileaf collimator and gantry motion for real-time magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy.

Jerrold E Kielbasa1, Sanford L Meeks1, Patrick Kelly1, Twyla R Willoughby1, Omar Zeidan1, Amish P Shah1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Real-time magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) uses 2D cine imaging for target tracking. This work evaluates the percent image uniformity (PIU) and spatial integrity of cine images in the presence of multileaf collimator (MLC) and gantry motion in order to simulate sliding window and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) conditions.
METHODS: Percent image uniformity and spatial integrity of cine images were measured (1) during MLC motion, (2) as a function of static gantry position, and (3) during gantry rotation. PIU was calculated according to the ACR MRI Quality Control Manual. Spatial integrity was evaluated by measuring the geometric distortion of 16 measured marker positions (10 cm or 15.225 cm from isocenter).
RESULTS: The PIU of cine images did not vary by more than 1% from static linac conditions during MLC motion and did not vary by more than 3% during gantry rotation. Banding artifacts were present during gantry rotation. The geometric distortion in the cine images was less than 0.88 mm for all points measured throughout MLC motion. For all static gantry positions, the geometric distortion was less than 0.88 mm at 10 cm from isocenter and less than 1.4 mm at 15.225 cm from isocenter. During gantry rotation, the geometric distortion remained less than 0.92 mm at 10 cm from isocenter and less than 1.60 mm at 15.225 cm from isocenter.
CONCLUSION: During MLC motion, cine images maintained adequate PIU, and the geometric distortion of points within 15.225 cm from isocenter was less than the 1 mm threshold necessary for real-time target tracking and gating. During gantry rotation, PIU was negatively affected by banding artifacts, and spatial integrity was only maintained within 10 cm from isocenter. Future work should investigate the effects imaging artifacts have on real-time target tracking during MRgRT.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRgRT; cine MRI; percent image uniformity; spatial distortion

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33226709      PMCID: PMC7769407          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  17 in total

1.  Volumetric tracking tool using four-dimensional CT for image guided-radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rie Tanaka; Shinichiro Mori; Masahiro Endo; Shigeru Sanada
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-11-13

2.  Characterization of the onboard imaging unit for the first clinical magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system.

Authors:  Yanle Hu; Leith Rankine; Olga L Green; Rojano Kashani; H Harold Li; Hua Li; Roger Nana; Vivian Rodriguez; Lakshmi Santanam; Shmaryu Shvartsman; James Victoria; H Omar Wooten; James F Dempsey; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Artificial neural network for suppression of banding artifacts in balanced steady-state free precession MRI.

Authors:  Ki Hwan Kim; Sung-Hong Park
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  First clinical implementation of real-time, real anatomy tracking and radiation beam control.

Authors:  Olga L Green; Leith J Rankine; Bin Cai; Austen Curcuru; Rojano Kashani; Vivian Rodriguez; H Harold Li; Parag J Parikh; Clifford G Robinson; Jeffrey R Olsen; Sasa Mutic; S M Goddu; Lakshmi Santanam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  MRI-Linear Accelerator Radiotherapy Systems.

Authors:  G P Liney; B Whelan; B Oborn; M Barton; P Keall
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.126

Review 6.  Motion artifacts in MRI: A complex problem with many partial solutions.

Authors:  Maxim Zaitsev; Julian Maclaren; Michael Herbst
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniques.

Authors:  A Brahme
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 8.  The clinical introduction of MR-guided radiation therapy from a RTT perspective.

Authors:  R Botman; S U Tetar; M A Palacios; B J Slotman; F J Lagerwaard; A M E Bruynzeel
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-04-26

9.  RapidArc, SmartArc and TomoHD compared with classical step and shoot and sliding window intensity modulated radiotherapy in an oropharyngeal cancer treatment plan comparison.

Authors:  Dirk Van Gestel; Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij; Frank Van den Heuvel; Wouter Crijns; Ann Coelmont; Bie De Ost; Andrea Holt; Emmy Lamers; Yasmyne Geussens; Sandra Nuyts; Danielle Van den Weyngaert; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Jan B Vermorken; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Comprehensive dosimetric planning comparison for early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer with SABR: fixed-beam IMRT versus VMAT versus TomoTherapy.

Authors:  Ilma Xhaferllari; Omar El-Sherif; Stewart Gaede
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.