Literature DB >> 26429257

Characterization of the onboard imaging unit for the first clinical magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system.

Yanle Hu1, Leith Rankine2, Olga L Green2, Rojano Kashani2, H Harold Li2, Hua Li2, Roger Nana3, Vivian Rodriguez2, Lakshmi Santanam2, Shmaryu Shvartsman3, James Victoria3, H Omar Wooten2, James F Dempsey3, Sasa Mutic2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the performance of the onboard imaging unit for the first clinical magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT) system.
METHODS: The imaging performance characterization included four components: ACR (the American College of Radiology) phantom test, spatial integrity, coil signal to noise ratio (SNR) and uniformity, and magnetic field homogeneity. The ACR phantom test was performed in accordance with the ACR phantom test guidance. The spatial integrity test was evaluated using a 40.8 × 40.8 × 40.8 cm(3) spatial integrity phantom. MR and computed tomography (CT) images of the phantom were acquired and coregistered. Objects were identified around the surfaces of 20 and 35 cm diameters of spherical volume (DSVs) on both the MR and CT images. Geometric distortion was quantified using deviation in object location between the MR and CT images. The coil SNR test was performed according to the national electrical manufacturers association (NEMA) standards MS-1 and MS-9. The magnetic field homogeneity test was measured using field camera and spectral peak methods.
RESULTS: For the ACR tests, the slice position error was less than 0.10 cm, the slice thickness error was less than 0.05 cm, the resolved high-contrast spatial resolution was 0.09 cm, the resolved low-contrast spokes were more than 25, the image intensity uniformity was above 93%, and the percentage ghosting was less than 0.22%. All were within the ACR recommended specifications. The maximum geometric distortions within the 20 and 35 cm DSVs were 0.10 and 0.18 cm for high spatial resolution three-dimensional images and 0.08 and 0.20 cm for high temporal resolution two dimensional cine images based on the distance-to-phantom-center method. The average SNR was 12.0 for the body coil, 42.9 for the combined torso coil, and 44.0 for the combined head and neck coil. Magnetic field homogeneities at gantry angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° were 23.55, 20.43, 18.76, 19.11, and 22.22 ppm, respectively, using the field camera method over the 45 cm DSV.
CONCLUSIONS: The onboard imaging unit of the first commercial MR-IGRT system meets ACR, NEMA, and vendor specifications.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26429257     DOI: 10.1118/1.4930249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  MRI-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  A M Chen; S Hsu; J Lamb; Y Yang; N Agazaryan; M L Steinberg; D A Low; M Cao
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  The future of image-guided radiotherapy will be MR guided.

Authors:  Julianne M Pollard; Zhifei Wen; Ramaswamy Sadagopan; Jihong Wang; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Characterization of spatial distortion in a 0.35 T MRI-guided radiotherapy system.

Authors:  John S Ginn; Nzhde Agazaryan; Minsong Cao; Umar Baharom; Daniel A Low; Yingli Yang; Yu Gao; Peng Hu; Percy Lee; James M Lamb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy (MRIgRT): A 4.5-Year Clinical Experience.

Authors:  L E Henke; J A Contreras; O L Green; B Cai; H Kim; M C Roach; J R Olsen; B Fischer-Valuck; D F Mullen; R Kashani; M A Thomas; J Huang; I Zoberi; D Yang; V Rodriguez; J D Bradley; C G Robinson; P Parikh; S Mutic; J Michalski
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Computerized triplet beam orientation optimization for MRI-guided Co-60 radiotherapy.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; David Thomas; Minsong Cao; Daniel O'Connor; James Lamb; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Association Between Internal Organ/Liver Tumor and External Surface Motion From Cine MR Images on an MRI-Linac.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Joshua Kim; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging guided reirradiation of recurrent and second primary head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Allen M Chen; Minsong Cao; Sophia Hsu; James Lamb; Argin Mikaeilian; Yingli Yang; Nzhde Agazaryan; Daniel A Low; Michael L Steinberg
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-02-21

8.  Practical Implications of Ferromagnetic Artifacts in Low-field MRI-guided Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Olga Green; Lauren E Henke; Parag Parikh; Michael C Roach; Jeff M Michalski; H Michael Gach
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-22

Review 9.  Realizing the potential of magnetic resonance image guided radiotherapy in gynaecological and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid M White; Erica Scurr; Andreas Wetscherek; Gina Brown; Aslam Sohaib; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke; David Dearnaley; Susan Lalondrelle; Shreerang Bhide
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Delivery of online adaptive magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy based on isodose boundaries.

Authors:  Claudio Votta; Davide Cusumano; Luca Boldrini; Nicola Dinapoli; Lorenzo Placidi; Gabriele Turco; Marco Valerio Antonelli; Veronica Pollutri; Angela Romano; Luca Indovina; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.