Literature DB >> 22925989

Comparison of Expandable and Fixed Interbody Cages in a Human Cadaver Corpectomy Model: Fatigue Characteristics.

Murat Pekmezci1, Jessica A Tang, Liu Cheng, Ashin Modak, Robert T McClellan, Jenni M Buckley, Christopher P Ames.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: In vitro cadaver biomechanics study.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to compare the in situ fatigue life of expandable versus fixed interbody cage designs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Expandable cages are becoming more popular, in large part, due to their versatility; however, subsidence and catastrophic failure remain a concern. This in vitro analysis investigates the fatigue life of expandable and fixed interbody cages in a single level human cadaver corpectomy model by evaluating modes of subsidence of expandable and fixed cages as well as change in stiffness of the constructs with cyclic loading.
METHODS: Nineteen specimens from 10 human thoracolumbar spines (T10-L2, L3-L5) were biomechanically evaluated after a single level corpectomy that was reconstructed with an expandable or fixed cage and anterior dual rod instrumentation. All specimens underwent 98 K cycles to simulate 3 months of postoperative weight bearing. In addition, a third group with hyperlordotic cages was used to simulate catastrophic failure that is observed in clinical practice.
RESULTS: Three fixed and 2 expandable cages withstood the cyclic loading despite perfect sagittal and coronal plane fitting of the endcaps. The majority of the constructs settled in after initial subsidence. The catastrophic failures that were observed in clinical practice could not be reproduced with hyperlordotic cages. However, all cages in this group subsided, and 60% resulted in endplate fractures during deployment of the cage.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite greater surface contact area, expandable cages have a trend for higher subsidence rates when compared with fixed cages. When there is edge loading as in the hyperlordotic cage scenario, there is a higher risk of subsidence and intraoperative fracture during deployment of expandable cages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 22925989     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eb0f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  3 in total

1.  Two-piece ALIF cage optimizes the bone-implant interface in a 360° setting.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; David Volkheimer; Bruce Robie; Finn B Christensen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Importance of the epiphyseal ring in OLIF stand-alone surgery: a biomechanical study on cadaveric spines.

Authors:  Xuyang Zhang; Hao Wu; Yilei Chen; Junhui Liu; Jian Chen; Teng Zhang; ZhaoFeng Zhou; Shunwu Fan; Patricia Dolan; Michael Anthony Adams; Fengdong Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Technical nuances and approach-related morbidity of anterolateral and posterolateral lumbar corpectomy approaches-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Christoph Wipplinger; Sara Lener; Christoph Orban; Tamara M Wipplinger; Anto Abramovic; Anna Lang; Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.816

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.