Literature DB >> 19117789

Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation--a finite element study.

Yang-Hwei Tsuang1, Yueh-Feng Chiang, Chih-Yi Hung, Hung-Wen Wei, Chang-Hung Huang, Cheng-Kung Cheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages have achieved satisfactory fusion results, but cases of cage migration or mechanical failure were repeatedly reported. Therefore, we conducted a finite element study to determine the impact of cage applications including number, positioning, and adding posterior instrumentation (PI).
METHODS: A finite element model of the lumbar spine was generated from Computer Tomography scans and was validated. Partial laminectomy, diskectomy with partial facetectomy, and single or double-cage insertion were simulated onto the model, with or without posterior pedicle screws instrumentation. The maximal von Mises stresses between different loading conditions were compared between modalities to evaluate the risks of migration or mechanical failure.
RESULTS: Posterior instrumentation decreases at least half the distortion stress of cage-endplate interface and facet joints, and diminishes the differences between the stresses of inserting one or two cages. Based on one cage insertion, adding posterior instrumentation provides more efficient stability than an additional cage. Furthermore, an obliquely inserted cage with posterior instrumentation produced lower stress than a cage inserted on one side due to better structural symmetry. Conclusively, one oblique anterior cage and bilateral posterior pedicle screws reconstructed the tripod system as the intact disc and facet joints, and provided similar stability as two cages did.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19117789     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  9 in total

1.  Lumbar interbody fusion: a parametric investigation of a novel cage design with and without posterior instrumentation.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Hendrik Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A morphometric analysis of contralateral neural foramen in TLIF.

Authors:  Pyung Goo Cho; Sang Hyuk Park; Keung Nyun Kim; Yoon Ha; Do Heum Yoon; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Prediction of complications and fusion outcomes of fused lumbar spine with or without fixation system under whole-body vibration.

Authors:  Qing-Dong Wang; Li-Xin Guo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Long-term effects of placing one or two cages in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mingzheng Zhang; Fang Pu; Liqiang Xu; Linlin Zhang; Jie Yao; Deyu Li; Yu Wang; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Importance of the epiphyseal ring in OLIF stand-alone surgery: a biomechanical study on cadaveric spines.

Authors:  Xuyang Zhang; Hao Wu; Yilei Chen; Junhui Liu; Jian Chen; Teng Zhang; ZhaoFeng Zhou; Shunwu Fan; Patricia Dolan; Michael Anthony Adams; Fengdong Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Biomechanics of extreme lateral interbody fusion with different internal fixation methods: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Li; Li-Jun She; Wei Zhang; Xiao-Dong Cheng; Jin-Peng Fan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Cervical non-fusion using biomimetic artificial disc and vertebra complex: technical innovation and biomechanics analysis.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Pengrong OuYang; Xijing He; Xinyu Wei; Zhongwei Sun; Hui Dong; Zhijing Wen; Yibin Wang; Pengzhen Gu; Teng Lu; Ning Liu; Haopeng Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Weibo Huang; Ye Tian; Hongli Wang; Jianyuan Jiang; Ruoyu Li; Fei Zou; Xiaosheng Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.562

9.  Biomechanical comparison of three stand-alone lumbar cages--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Ming-Chieh Chiang; Jin-Fu Lin; Shang-Chih Lin; Ching-Hua Hung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.