Literature DB >> 26783095

Macular Morphology and Visual Acuity in the Second Year of the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials.

Sumit Sharma1, Cynthia A Toth1, Ebenezer Daniel2, Juan E Grunwald2, Maureen G Maguire2, Gui-Shuang Ying2, Jiayan Huang2, Daniel F Martin3, Glenn J Jaffe4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the association between morphologic features on fundus photography (FP), fluorescein angiography (FA), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity (VA) in the second year of the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study within a randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Participants in the CATT.
METHODS: Study eye eligibility required angiographic and OCT evidence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and VA between 20/25 and 20/320. Treatment was assigned randomly to ranibizumab or bevacizumab with 3 different dosing regimens over a 2-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fluid type, location, and thickness; retina and subretinal tissue complex thickness on OCT; size and lesion composition on FP and FA; and VA.
RESULTS: Among 1185 CATT participants, 993 (84%) had fluid on OCT at baseline and completed 2 years of follow-up. At 2 years, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), sub-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) fluid, and subretinal tissue complex thickness decreased in all treatment groups. Ranibizumab monthly was best able to resolve each type of fluid. Eyes with SRF in the foveal center on OCT had better mean VA than eyes with no SRF (72.8 vs. 66.6 letters; P = 0.006). Eyes with IRF in the foveal center had worse mean VA than eyes without IRF (59.9 vs. 70.9 letters; P < 0.0001). Eyes with retinal thickness <120 μm had worse VA compared with eyes with retinal thickness 120 to 212 and >212 μm (59.4 vs. 71.3 vs. 70.3 letters; P < 0.0001). At 2 years, the mean VA (letters) of eyes varied substantially by the type of subfoveal pathology on FP and FA: 70.6 for no pathology; 74.1 for fluid only; 73.3 for CNV or pigment epithelial (RPE) detachment; 68.4 for nongeographic atrophy; and 62.9 for geographic atrophy, hemorrhage, RPE tear, or scar (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The associations between VA and morphologic features identified through year 1 were maintained or strengthened during year 2. Eyes with foveal IRF, abnormally thin retina, greater thickness of the subretinal tissue complex on OCT, and subfoveal geographic atrophy or scar on FP/FA had the worst VA. Subretinal fluid was associated with better VA.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26783095      PMCID: PMC4998967          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  10 in total

1.  REFRACTORY INTRARETINAL OR SUBRETINAL FLUID IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION TREATED WITH INTRAVITREAL RANIZUBIMAB: Functional and Structural Outcome.

Authors:  Christina Gianniou; Ali Dirani; Liuna Jang; Irmela Mantel
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Retention of good visual acuity in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and chronic refractory subfoveal subretinal fluid.

Authors:  Kavita V Bhavsar; K Bailey Freund
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-12

3.  Optical coherence tomography grading reproducibility during the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials.

Authors:  Francis Char DeCroos; Cynthia A Toth; Sandra S Stinnett; Cynthia S Heydary; Russell Burns; Glenn J Jaffe
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results.

Authors:  Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire; Stuart L Fine; Gui-shuang Ying; Glenn J Jaffe; Juan E Grunwald; Cynthia Toth; Maryann Redford; Frederick L Ferris
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Photographic assessment of baseline fundus morphologic features in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials.

Authors:  Juan E Grunwald; Ebenezer Daniel; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maxwell Pistilli; Maureen G Maguire; Judith Alexander; Revell Whittock-Martin; Candace R Parker; Krista Sepielli; Barbara A Blodi; Daniel F Martin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Pigment epithelial detachment followed by retinal cystoid degeneration leads to vision loss in treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Sebastian M Waldstein; Gabor-Gyoergy Deak; Michael Kundi; Christian Simader
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire; Gui-shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Stuart L Fine; Glenn J Jaffe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Normal macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using Stratus optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Annie Chan; Jay S Duker; Tony H Ko; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-02

9.  Macular morphology and visual acuity in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials.

Authors:  Glenn J Jaffe; Daniel F Martin; Cynthia A Toth; Ebenezer Daniel; Maureen G Maguire; Gui-Shuang Ying; Juan E Grunwald; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: one-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial.

Authors:  Usha Chakravarthy; Simon P Harding; Chris A Rogers; Susan M Downes; Andrew J Lotery; Sarah Wordsworth; Barnaby C Reeves
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 12.079

  10 in total
  59 in total

1.  Durability of every-8-week aflibercept maintenance therapy in treatment-experienced neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Kunny C Dans; Sarah R Freeman; Tiezhu Lin; Amit Meshi; Sergio Olivas; Lingyun Cheng; Manuel J Amador-Patarroyo; William R Freeman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Robust total retina thickness segmentation in optical coherence tomography images using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Freerk G Venhuizen; Bram van Ginneken; Bart Liefers; Mark J J P van Grinsven; Sascha Fauser; Carel Hoyng; Thomas Theelen; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Development and Course of Scars in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials.

Authors:  Ebenezer Daniel; Wei Pan; Gui-Shuang Ying; Benjamin J Kim; Juan E Grunwald; Frederick L Ferris; Glenn J Jaffe; Cynthia A Toth; Daniel F Martin; Stuart L Fine; Maureen G Maguire
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  Aldosterone as a mediator of severity in retinal vascular disease: Evidence and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Michael J Allingham; Priyatham S Mettu; Scott W Cousins
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 5.  A view of the current and future role of optical coherence tomography in the management of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  U Schmidt-Erfurth; S Klimscha; S M Waldstein; H Bogunović
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  LONG-TERM REMISSION OF NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION WITH AS-NEEDED ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY.

Authors:  Ilkay Kilic Muftuoglu; Mostafa Alam; Qi Sheng You; Raouf Gaber; Hema L Ramkumar; Nadia Mendoza; Amit Meshi; William R Freeman
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  [Visual acuity in anti-VEGF therapy for AMD : Can specific characteristics in the SD-OCT help?]

Authors:  B Book; M Ziegler; B Heimes; M Gutfleisch; G Spital; D Pauleikhoff; A Lommatzsch
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Incidence and Progression of Nongeographic Atrophy in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT) Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ebenezer Daniel; Maureen G Maguire; Juan E Grunwald; Cynthia A Toth; Glenn J Jaffe; Daniel F Martin; Gui-Shuang Ying
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  Evolution of Intravitreal Therapy for Retinal Diseases-From CMV to CNV: The LXXIV Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  Daniel F Martin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Macular Morphology and Visual Acuity in Year Five of the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials.

Authors:  Glenn J Jaffe; Gui-Shuang Ying; Cynthia A Toth; Ebenezer Daniel; Juan E Grunwald; Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.