Literature DB >> 22823091

Impact of a randomized campus/community trial to prevent high-risk drinking among college students.

Mark Wolfson1, Heather Champion, Thomas P McCoy, Scott D Rhodes, Edward H Ip, Jill N Blocker, Barbara Alvarez Martin, Kimberly G Wagoner, Mary Claire O'Brien, Erin L Sutfin, Ananda Mitra, Robert H Durant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-risk drinking by college students continues to pose a significant threat to public health. Despite increasing evidence of the contribution of community-level and campus-level environmental factors to high-risk drinking, there have been few rigorous tests of interventions that focus on changing these interlinked environments. The Study to Prevent Alcohol Related Consequences (SPARC) assessed the efficacy of a comprehensive intervention using a community organizing approach to implement environmental strategies in and around college campuses. The goal of SPARC was to reduce high-risk drinking and alcohol-related consequences among college students.
METHODS: Ten universities in North Carolina were randomized to an Intervention or Comparison condition. Each Intervention school was assigned a campus/community organizer. The organizer worked to form a campus-community coalition, which developed and implemented a strategic plan to use environmental strategies to reduce high-risk drinking and its consequences. The intervention was implemented over a period of 3 years. Primary outcome measures were assessed using a web-based survey of students. Measures of high-risk drinking included number of days alcohol was consumed, number of days of binge drinking, and greatest number of drinks consumed (all in the past 30 days); and number of days one gets drunk in a typical week. Measures of alcohol-related consequences included indices of moderate consequences due to one's own drinking, severe consequences due to one's own drinking, interpersonal consequences due to others' drinking, and community consequences due to others' drinking (all using a past 30-day time frame). Measure of alcohol-related injuries included (i) experiencing alcohol-related injuries and (ii) alcohol-related injuries caused to others.
RESULTS: We found significant decreases in the Intervention group compared with the Comparison group in severe consequences due to students' own drinking and alcohol-related injuries caused to others. In secondary analyses, higher levels of implementation of the intervention were associated with reductions in interpersonal consequences due to others' drinking and alcohol-related injuries caused to others.
CONCLUSIONS: A community organizing approach promoting implementation of environmental interventions can significantly affect high-risk drinking and its consequences among college students.
Copyright © 2012 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22823091      PMCID: PMC3752385          DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01786.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  45 in total

1.  Statistical models appropriate for designs often used in group-randomized trials.

Authors:  D M Murray
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001 May 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  A typology for campus-based alcohol prevention: moving toward environmental management strategies.

Authors:  William DeJong; Linda M Langford
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl       Date:  2002-03

Review 3.  Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: options and research findings.

Authors:  Traci L Toomey; Alexander C Wagenaar
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl       Date:  2002-03

4.  An integrated population-averaged approach to the design, analysis and sample size determination of cluster-unit trials.

Authors:  John S Preisser; Mary L Young; Daniel J Zaccaro; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Fighting back against substance abuse: are community coalitions winning?

Authors:  Denise Hallfors; Hyunsan Cho; David Livert; Charles Kadushin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts. Findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study surveys: 1993-2001.

Authors:  Henry Wechsler; Jae Eun Lee; Meichun Kuo; Mark Seibring; Toben F Nelson; Hang Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2002-03

7.  The relationship of alcohol outlet density to heavy and frequent drinking and drinking-related problems among college students at eight universities.

Authors:  Elissa R Weitzman; Alison Folkman; M P H Kerry Lemieux Folkman; Henry Wechsler
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.078

8.  Reducing drinking and related harms in college: evaluation of the "A Matter of Degree" program.

Authors:  Elissa R Weitzman; Toben F Nelson; Hang Lee; Henry Wechsler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Binge drinking among youths and young adults in the United States: 1979-2006.

Authors:  Richard A Grucza; Karen E Norberg; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.829

10.  Taking up binge drinking in college: the influences of person, social group, and environment.

Authors:  Elissa R Weitzman; Toben F Nelson; Henry Wechsler
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.012

View more
  24 in total

1.  Party Characteristics, Drinking Settings, and College Students' Risk of Intoxication: A Multi-Campus Study.

Authors:  Miesha Marzell; Niloofar Bavarian; Mallie J Paschall; Christina Mair; Robert F Saltz
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2015-08

2.  Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol (CMCA): secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial showing effects of community organizing on alcohol acquisition by youth in the Cherokee nation.

Authors:  Alexander C Wagenaar; Melvin D Livingston; Dallas W Pettigrew; Terrence K Kominsky; Kelli A Komro
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 3.  New research findings since the 2007 Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking: a review.

Authors:  Ralph Hingson; Aaron White
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Caffeinated Alcohol, Sensation Seeking, and Injury Risk.

Authors:  Mary Claire O'Brien; Thomas P McCoy; Kathleen L Egan; Shoshanna Goldin; Scott D Rhodes; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  J Caffeine Res       Date:  2013-06

5.  University-Affiliated Alcohol Marketing Enhances the Incentive Salience of Alcohol Cues.

Authors:  Bruce D Bartholow; Chris Loersch; Tiffany A Ito; Meredith P Levsen; Hannah I Volpert-Esmond; Kimberly A Fleming; Paul Bolls; Brooke K Carter
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-11-21

6.  Simultaneous use of non-medical ADHD prescription stimulants and alcohol among undergraduate students.

Authors:  Kathleen L Egan; Beth A Reboussin; Jill N Blocker; Mark Wolfson; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Magnitude and Trends in Heavy Episodic Drinking, Alcohol-Impaired Driving, and Alcohol-Related Mortality and Overdose Hospitalizations Among Emerging Adults of College Ages 18-24 in the United States, 1998-2014.

Authors:  Ralph Hingson; Wenxing Zha; Daniel Smyth
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.582

8.  What are young adults smoking in their hookahs? A latent class analysis of substances smoked.

Authors:  Erin L Sutfin; Eunyoung Y Song; Beth A Reboussin; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  First-year college students' interest in trying dissolvable tobacco products.

Authors:  Mark Wolfson; Jessica R Pockey; Beth A Reboussin; Erin L Sutfin; Kathleen L Egan; Kimberly G Wagoner; John G Spangler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Trends in point-of-sale tobacco marketing around college campuses: Opportunities for enhanced tobacco control efforts.

Authors:  Kimberly G Wagoner; Erin L Sutfin; Eunyoung Y Song; Jessica L King; Kathleen L Egan; Beth Reboussin; Beata Debinski; John Spangler; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2018-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.