| Literature DB >> 33218339 |
Lorraine A Draper1,2, Feargal J Ryan1,2,3, Marion Dalmasso1,2,4, Pat G Casey2, Angela McCann1,2, Vimalkumar Velayudhan1,2, R Paul Ross1, Colin Hill5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has become increasingly accepted that establishing and maintaining a complex and diverse gut microbiota is fundamental to human health. There are growing efforts to identify means of modulating and influencing the microbiota, especially in individuals who have experienced a disruption in their native microbiota. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is one method that restores diversity to the microbiota of an individual by introducing microbes from a healthy donor. FMT introduces the total microbial load into the recipient, including the bacteria, archaea, yeasts, protists and viruses. In this study, we investigated whether an autochthonous faecal viral transfer (FVT), in the form of a sterile faecal filtrate, could impact the recovery of a bacteriome disrupted by antibiotic treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic; Bacteriome; Bacteriophage; Microbiome; Murine; Transfer; Virome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33218339 PMCID: PMC7679995 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-020-00906-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Fig. 1PCoA plots of unweighted UniFrac distances for all timepoints and groups in Study 1. Ellipses represent 70% confidence intervals (a). Subsequently, a UniFrac PERMANOVA test was performed with the Adonis function to determine the statistical differences between FVT and Control mice (model formula = antibiotic treatment timepoint + phage/control status), the relevant PCoA plots and P values are displayed (b)
Fig. 2Volcano plots showing the results of DESeq2 which detects differentially abundant OTUs between the FVT and Control mice at each timepoint in Study 1 (a) and Study 2 (b). OTUs with an adjusted P value < 0.05 are positioned above the horizontal line. Normalised abundance is also represented. Families belonging to the phylum Firmicutes are indicated via varying shades of red, while families derived from Bacteroides are visualised in blue, and additional colours are used to represent other families and phyla
Fig. 3PCoA plots of unweighted UniFrac distances for all timepoints and groups in Study 2. Ellipses represent 70% confidence intervals (a). Subsequently, a UniFrac PERMANOVA test was performed with the Adonis function to determine the statistical differences between FVT and Control mice (model formula = antibiotic treatment timepoint + phage/control status), the relavant PCoA plots and P values are displayed (b)
Fig. 4Bacteroidetes Firmicutes ratio reveals that the ratio is statistically higher in FVT mice as determined via Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test; CT00 vs CT4/PT4: P value < 0.05; CT00 vs CT6: P value < 0.01; CT00 vs PT6: P value > 0.05)
Fig. 5Metagenomic analysis on DNA isolated from viruses extracted from murine faecal samples in Study 1 (a) and Study 2 (b). Results reflect the viromes of groups of mice, where faecal samples were combined and represent the viral pool in pre-treatment (n = 16), antibiotic-treated (n = 16), Control (n = 8) and FVT mice (n = 8) at each timepoint. Following sequencing contigs were assembled into putative viruses and the relative abundances are represented within this bar plot. Certain contigs of interest have been highlighted; those in black text are found in abundance in pre-antibiotic treatment mice and in greater abundance in FVT mice than in Control mice. Those highlighted in red text are in greater abundance in post-antibiotic treated mice and in greater abundance in Control mice than FVT mice